四川盆地中三叠世盐盆分布与演化特征研究

四川盆地卤水分布广泛，资源丰富, 早为世人所瞩目，中三叠统雷口坡组是四川盆地最早开采天然气和盐卤的层系之一。根据盆地雷口坡组大量钻井资料研究表明，盆地雷口坡组主要成盐期分别为雷三2 期和雷四2 期，在盆地东部和南部由于受到古隆起的影响，盐岩地层已被剥蚀难以保存，现今盐岩主要分布在开江古隆起和泸州古隆起的西部以及天井山古隆起的南部（华蓥山以西—龙门山以东的川西—川中地区）。印支运动对盆地雷口坡组盐岩在平面的迁移起着十分重要的作用，根据不同时期盐岩统计数据看，两期盐盆在平面上具有向西迁移、叠加的特征，其中川中的GS1 井就钻遇了这两期的盐岩。     

Sexual agreements and intimate-partner violence among male couples

Objectives: In the United States, HIV continues to disproportionately affect men who have sex with men. One promising area of research that may inform the development of behavioral interventions among male–male couples is within the realm of sexual agreements. Methods: The purpose of our analysis was to determine whether respondents who report having an open agreement or an agreement breakage also report a higher incidence of recent (within the previous 12 months) intimate-partner violence (IPV) compared to respondents who report having a monogamous agreement or no agreement breakage after controlling for demographic variables. Results: Results showed that men who have an open agreement are less likely to report recent physical IPV. Conclusions: The results highlight the need to develop dyadic behavior interventions that address sexual agreements and stress management.     

指数函数和对数函数的高精度快速算法

指数、对数函数的数值计算是一种最基本的算术操作,研究其快速算法,对于科学计算、数据处理,尤其是要求运算精度很高的实时控制系统,有着非常重要的意义.通过数值分析,考虑到精度要求较高,计算量和数表的存储空间这三个因素,结合计算和查表的方法给出了一些基本函数的快速算法.另外,还介绍了改进的高精度快速算法并演示了详细的计算过程.得出精度越高,内存越大,相应的操作速度却没有下降。     

大豆生产者补贴政策改革促进农户种植结构调整了吗?——基于全国446个县的准自然实验

以大豆生产者补贴政策改革作为切入点,将政策实施地区和非实施地区视为一次部分省份优化大豆、玉米种植结构的准自然实验,通过构建PSM-DID模型,考察大豆生产者补贴政策改革对农户种植结构调整的影响及其作用机制.结果表明:(1)大豆生产者补贴政策改革对农户种植结构调整具有显著的时间异质性,政策改革初年(2017年)大豆与玉米的面积之比显著提高6.5％,虽然2018年大豆与玉米的相对补贴额度出现大幅度增长,但大豆与玉米的面积之比仅显著提高3.4％;(2)预期相对收益的提升是2017年农户调整种植结构的重要原因,然而,经过对新制度一年的适应后,农户对种植玉米的路径依赖、补贴错位、地租的不合理增长以及大豆、玉米相对价格不理想等问题逐渐凸显,2018年农户重新调整种植决策,补贴的激励作用被迫减弱.基于此,研究结论为统筹大豆、玉米补贴机制可以促进农户种植结构调整提供经验性证据,也为在农业供给侧结构性改革和大豆振兴压力下如何持续改善种植结构提供政策启示.     

What is educational entrepreneurship? Strategic action,temporality, and the expansion of US higher education

Theory and Society - The massive expansion of US higher education after World War II is a sociological puzzle: a spectacular feat of state capacity-building in a highly federated polity. Prior...     

Properties of the weighted log‐rank test in the design of confirmatory studies with delayed effects

Proportional hazards are a common assumption when designing confirmatory clinical trials in oncology. This assumption not only affects the analysis part but also the sample size calculation. The presence of delayed effects causes a change in the hazard ratio while the trial is ongoing since at the beginning we do not observe any difference between treatment arms, and after some unknown time point, the differences between treatment arms will start to appear. Hence, the proportional hazards assumption no longer holds, and both sample size calculation and analysis methods to be used should be reconsidered. The weighted log‐rank test allows a weighting for early, middle, and late differences through the Fleming and Harrington class of weights and is proven to be more efficient when the proportional hazards assumption does not hold. The Fleming and Harrington class of weights, along with the estimated delay, can be incorporated into the sample size calculation in order to maintain the desired power once the treatment arm differences start to appear. In this article, we explore the impact of delayed effects in group sequential and adaptive group sequential designs and make an empirical evaluation in terms of power and type‐I error rate of the of the weighted log‐rank test in a simulated scenario with fixed values of the Fleming and Harrington class of weights. We also give some practical recommendations regarding which methodology should be used in the presence of delayed effects depending on certain characteristics of the trial.     

Global Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Public Organization Review -     

税务行政裁量权的理论阐释、行为纠偏与路径选择

税法中不确定概念下的理论空间以及税务行政的实践需求共同营造了税务行政裁量的制度空间，而不规范的税务行政裁量则为不规范的税收执法提供了操作机会。通过对税法文本中不确定概念理论缘由的寻求，以及税收征管中实践动因的梳理，税务行政裁量权的规范化确有必要性。为达成税法运行各司其职中的彼此制衡，有必要强化比例性原则在税务行政裁量中的运用，以此限制税权介入纳税人私域的范围与限度，并提供明确化的宏观指引；利用行政裁量基准“行政自制”与“规则之治”的双重品质，借助标准化的文本修正，为规范化的税收执法预设行为轨迹、构建外在制约并压缩裁量空间；以纳税人的同意权为基础，设计符合税法特殊性的程序规则，形成立体化的纳税人救济路径。最终形成税务行政裁量权积极运作与规范运行的制度环境。     

Can Children Recognize Bodily Expressions of Emotion?

Journal of Nonverbal Behavior - Past research has demonstrated that children understand distinct emotion concepts and can accurately recognize facial expressions of distinct emotions by a young...     

Efficacy,Action, and Support for Reducing Climate Change Risks

A growing body of research demonstrates that believing action to reduce the risks of climate change is both possible (self‐efficacy) and effective (response efficacy) is essential to motivate and sustain risk mitigation efforts. Despite this potentially critical role of efficacy beliefs, measures and their use vary wildly in climate change risk perception and communication research, making it hard to compare and learn from efficacy studies. To address this problem and advance our understanding of efficacy beliefs, this article makes three contributions. First, we present a theoretically motivated approach to measuring climate change mitigation efficacy, in light of diverse proposed, perceived, and previously researched strategies. Second, we test this in two national survey samples (Amazon's Mechanical Turk N = 405, GfK Knowledge Panel N = 1,820), demonstrating largely coherent beliefs by level of action and discrimination between types of efficacy. Four additive efficacy scales emerge: personal self‐efficacy, personal response efficacy, government and collective self‐efficacy, and government and collective response efficacy. Third, we employ the resulting efficacy scales in mediation models to test how well efficacy beliefs predict climate change policy support, controlling for specific knowledge, risk perceptions, and ideology, and allowing for mediation by concern. Concern fully mediates the relatively strong effects of perceived risk on policy support, but only partly mediates efficacy beliefs. Stronger government and collective response efficacy beliefs and personal self‐efficacy beliefs are both directly and indirectly associated with greater support for reducing the risks of climate change, even after controlling for ideology and causal beliefs about climate change.