Deviant social positions in small groups: The relation between role and individual

This paper studies a deviant social position within a small group of Italian Fishermen. The role of “court-jester” emerges and, as the title suggests, the relation between this role and the inherent properties of the deviant are explored. It is argued that the emergence of roles among deviant social positions is dependent upon the personal attributes of the deviant and the characteristics of his relations to other members of the group.     

Inférence statistique dans les processus stochastiques: Aperçu historique

The study of statistical inference for stochastic processes has evolved along two paths. Some problems related to particular processes have been studied, and also some trials to extend general results obtained for independent identically distributed random variables have been made. We retrace the first main contributions, evaluate their influence, and give an idea of the evolution of the research in the field of statistical inference made with observations coming from a stochastic process.     

Sociological gains and losses: The case of the national health care use and expenditure surveys

This article reflects on the role of sociological concepts and of sociologists in a series of national surveys that have proved important to national health policy in financing and access to health care. The development of the early surveys in a university setting and their migration to the government is discussed, as is the relative influence of sociologists and economists. The changing focus of health policy from access to care through expanded government programs, to cost containment and utilization control, provides an important context for understanding these developments. Areas are identified where sociologists can make significant contributions to health policy in financing and access to care. She received her PhD in Sociology from the University of Chicago. She spent six years as a Senior Sociologist at NCHSR working on all aspects of the NMCES, and three years as an analyst in the Office of Research at the Health Care Financing Administration. He received his PhD in Sociology from New York University. He joined NCHSR to conduct analyses of the NMCES data and has had major responsibilities in the design of NMES.     

Combining New Institutionalisms: Explaining Institutional Change in American Property Insurance

This article combines institutionalisms to explain fundamental change in American property insurance. During the 1950s, the industry shifted from associations to price-competitive markets and vertically integrated firms. I advance two new arguments to explain this shift: First, institutions endogenously generate conditions for change. Second, fundamental change or institutional replacement depends on a dynamic convergence of conditions—market failures, legitimacy crises, new models of order—and the culmination of this dynamic in politics and policies that admit alternatives into fields. Together, these arguments reduce indeterminacies in existing theories of change and shed new light on punctuated equilibria and the politics of transformation.