A scale-location adjustment for proportional hazards deviance residuals

We show that deviance residuals derived using the proportional hazards assumption (including Cox regression) are not asymptotically standard normal, but that a scale-location adjustment makes them nearly standard normal, even for moderate sample sizes. This adjustment should aid in outlier detection, as it allows a more exact assessment of when a deviance residual is unusually large.     

The mixed model for survey regression estimation

Estimation of the population mean under the regression model with random components is considered. Conditions under which the random components regression estimator is design consistent are given. It is shown that consistency holds when incorrect values are used for the variance components. The regression estimator constructed with model parameters that differ considerably from the true parameters performed well in a Monte Carlo study. Variance estimators for the regression predictor are suggested. A variance estimator appropriate for estimators constructed with a biased estimator for the between-group variance component performed well in the Monte Carlo study.     

A Method to Compare Two Samples of Recurrence Data

This paper presents a nonparametric comparison of two samples of units subject to recurrent events. The method is illustrated with applications to the repair of locomotive braking grids and to recurrent bladder tumors in patients. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Rationing Capacity Between Two Product Classes*

In this paper, we study the capacity allocation problem faced by make-to-order manufacturing firms encountering expected total demand in excess of available capacity. Specifically, we focus on firms' manufacturing short-life-cycle or seasonal products such as high fashion apparel. Using a decision-theory-based approach, we develop a capacity allocation policy that allows such firms to discriminate between two classes of products (one yielding a higher profit contribution per unit of capacity allocated to it than the other), resulting in selective rejection of orders for the class with the lower unit contribution. The effectiveness of capacity rationing is investigated under a wide array of conditions characterized by variations in factors such as the ratio of unit profit contributions of the two product classes, the ratio of total available capacity to expected total demand, the ratio of expected demands between the two classes, and the variability in demand for each product class. The results indicate that capacity rationing is very effective in increasing the total profit, and could therefore serve as a valuable decision tool for managers in such firms.