《全宋词》孙吴会《摸鱼儿》词校议

《全宋词》第四册孙吴会《摸鱼儿·题甘露寺多景楼词曰:“八窗空、展宽秋影,长江流入尊俎。天围绀碧低群岫,余日去鸿堪数。沉别浦。但目断、烟芜莽苍连平楚。晨钟暮鼓。算触景多愁,关人底事,倚槛听鸣橹。英雄恨,赢得名存北府。寄奴今寄何所。西风依旧潮来去,山海颃吞吐。霜月古。直耐冷、相随燕我瑶芝圃。掀髯起舞。看伏苍苔,龙吟翟葆,天籁奏韶舞。”(第2951页)按:《全宋词》此篇,盖自南京图书馆藏抄本元俞希鲁《至顺镇江志》卷二○辑出。其可商者,下片末二韵两用“后边”字,疑有一讹。窃谓“天籁奏韶舞”句,动宾搭配未安,“奏”乐则是,“奏”“舞”则欠通矣。当作“天籁奏韶武”,“舞”乃“武”之音讹。     

叶小纨生平及作品小考

前人对叶小纨的生平及作品作过较为详尽的考证。但笔者在研究中发现,叶小纨的出嫁时间、《鸳鸯梦》杂剧的版本情况以及诗词作品情况均有待商榷。     

中韩两国离宫景观布局的比较探究——以避暑山庄和昌德宫比较为例

避暑山庄和昌德宫是中韩两国造园巅峰时期的皇家典型离宫园林。本文以皇家离宫园林布局为切入点,从离宫选址、山水骨架、建筑、园路、植物五个方面对比中韩两国之间的造园异同,探讨两国离宫景观布局发展源流,推动中韩园林文化艺术的共同发展以及世界园林艺术文化交融研究。     

以联席会议构建监、检互涉案件沟通机制

《监察法》等规范规定了沟通机制下的监、检互涉案件管辖原则。该原则其实是不明确的,故需要以联席会议为基础,实现协商沟通机制的具体化。监、检两机关之间的联席会议召集部门内资深、专业的人员参与、使与会人员平等自由地表达、在意见交换后独立地表决出多数意见。体现共识的协商结果应当具有弱约束作用,检委会作出与会议结果不同的决定时应当有说服力强的理由。"监察为主"管辖原则并不完善,有时需要"检察为主",此时沟通机制大有用武之地。     

唐代开元盛世的边疆格局及其西北民族关系——以敦煌遗书P.2555陷蕃组诗为中心

敦煌遗书P.2555是一卷重要文书,其中陷蕃组诗七十二首,反映出当时唐代开元盛世的边疆格局及其与西北各民族之间的复杂关系。P.2555陷蕃组诗集中体现的是唐代开元后期大唐与吐蕃、突骑施、大食、突厥等边疆关系,其创作时间可以推定为开元二十二年冬到开元二十四年秋,不是过去通常认为的敦煌沦陷时期或沦陷前夕。陷蕃组诗作者所称呼的"王都护姨夫"即安西都护王斛斯,唐开元后期镇守西域边关的重要统帅,而陷蕃组诗作者身份为大唐出使塞外戎乡的"富有宰相之望"的吏部尚书、皇室宗亲李暠,不是过去通常所提的毛押牙、马云奇。     

互联网医疗服务法律监管研究

随着互联网技术的进步以及医疗改革的深入,互联网医疗服务成为新生业态.然而,我国互联网医疗服务法律监管体系还不够完善,缺乏统一规范的监管体系,多头监管、个人隐私隐患大、纠纷处理解决机制不健全等现实困境尚未解决,不利于互联网医疗服务行业的发展和人民群众身心健康.为解决上述问题,通过梳理发达国家的成功经验,如美国的移动医疗应用程序监管和个人隐私保护、欧盟的互联医疗数据管理、英国的行业协会监管等,结合我国现有国情,建议从完善立法体系、建设隐私保护机制、构建行业监管、明晰医疗服务主体责任等方面健全互联网医疗法律监管制度,以期推动互联网医疗服务行业发展,保障医患双方的合法权益.     

以市场观念为背景看高校人力资源管理

伴随着市场经济不断发展,传统的高校人力资源管理不能够满足社会发展的需求,需要更加市场化、全面化。笔者以市场观念为背景探讨高校人力资源管理与传统高校人力人事管理的区别。在良好的外部环境下,一种高效且全方位的管理,必须利用市场机制来进行,这样才能使高校人力资源达到最优化及得到更高的工作效率。     

深圳特区产业结构变迁与经济增长

通过对深圳市1979—2009年的经济统计数据进行回归与图表分析,描述深圳市的产业结构状况及其形成过程,指出了深圳开Z30年来虽经济成就斐然,但产业结构相比20世纪90年代仍无实质改变。文章依据分析思路认为深圳尤应加速推进产业结构转换、升级,提升第三产业产值在GDP中的比重,形成更高效率经济增长方式并优化产业结构,从而实现经济体的现代化转型。     

西部民族地区旅游生态补偿政策实施的实践探索

The ethnic regions of Western Chi￣na are rich in ecological and cultural tourism re￣sources. At the same time, the regions are also ec￣ologically vulnerable areas with large populations of ethnic groups who have lived for a long time in poverty. Based on years’ investigation, it is obvi￣ous that tourism development, even though it can promote local economic development, has had a significant negative impact on the ecology, envi￣ronment and local communities. During the 18 th and 17 th National Congresses of the Communist Pary of China, a policy was announced to improve ecological compensation and accelerate the estab￣lishment of an ecological compensation mecha￣nism. So far, both government and academia have mainly focused on the effects and necessities of building a mechanism for ecological compensation. Of special concern, even if governments at all lev￣els sequentially enacted a series of policie with cer￣tain characteristics of ecological compensation, the public is still questioning the impartiality and legit￣imacy of the charges of such policy of ecological compensation. Thus, the task of implementing the ecological compensation policy faces many obsta￣cles. At present, the core research issue on eco￣logical compensation is no longer just the question of why it should be charged. This question was al￣ready clearly stated in official documents from cen￣tral government. Up to now, the core issues that need clarification are:in practice, how the charge be made; what amount of money should be charged;how will the revenue from the charge be used;how will the revenue derived from the charge be audited; and whether or not this charge can help to achieve government objectives in such a way.
Based on the unique background of the ethnic regions of Western China, this paper deeply analy￣ses issues of implementing policies such as ecologi￣cal compensation for tourism, including the illegi￣bility and legitimacy of who should pay, how much should be paid, and how to manage the funds im￣partially; and providing scientific and reasonable countermeasures to solve these practical problems. Compared with other industries, the tourism indus￣try became the pioneer for the practice of ecologi￣cal compensation as well as the research objective of ecological compensation studies. Some research￣ers defined ecological compensation for tourism as a system of regulating related ecological interests to protect the ecosystems of tourism destinations and promote sustainable development of the tourism in￣dustry ( Zhang Yiqun, Yang Guihua, 2012 ) . Al￣though such a definition is still fuzzy, at least it in￣dicates that the research of ecological compensation for tourism involves interdisciplinary fields inclu￣ding Economics, Sociology, Ecology and Tourism, etc. Currently, the research of ecological compen￣sation for tourism has insufficient first hand empiri￣cal research data. At the same time it has not yet had nationwide impact, either domestically or over￣seas. The research on implementing policies for the ecological compensation of tourism is at an early stage in China.
Obviously, it is hard to find sufficient re￣search results or research methods for reference, which brings certain limitations to this paper. To demonstrate the scope of this study, this paper de￣fined tourism ecological compensation as exploring the feasibility of spending fiscal revenue ( paid by tourism enterprises, tourists or other stakeholders) on protecting natural ecological environment. Based on this definition, this paper generated three actual issues with regard to implementing policies of ecological compensation for tourism, including the vagueness of the charge, the lack of unified, standard levies, and the non-tranparency of fund management. Combined with analyzing the current special background of implementing policies of ec￣ological compensation for tourism in the ethnic re￣gions of Western China, and by especially empha￣sizing the local communities of the ethnic groups who should be compensated, this paper tries to provide scientific and reasonable countermeasures consisting of implementing corresponding national policy, formulating correlated policy in accordance with local conditions and standardizing and institu￣tionalizing fund management. This paper not only attempts to support strongly implementing policies of ecological compensation for tourism at the insti￣tutional level, but also to coordinate the contradic￣tions between tourism development and ecological protection, and local community self - develop￣ment, hoping to achieve the win-win objectives of promoting an ecological compensation policy for tourism, tourism poverty alleviation and ecological civilization.