集体行动的村庄有组织建设模式探讨——以花都区毕村为例

农用地被征收,村庄建设用地开发权被压制,征用制度的缺陷以及村庄引导政策的缺失,往往容易导致城市边缘的村庄无序及低效开发,从而形成环境恶劣、效益低下的城边村或城中村,导致集体土地与土地开发权的矛盾日益明显。本文以广州东风日产边上的毕村为例,在保留村民宅基地的前提下,通过宅基地置换、多余用地集中建设以及增益公共还原等政策,探讨村庄的有组织建设模式并以此推动村集体行动,形成良好的村庄形态,以及高效的集体资产建设。     

An Integrated Risk Assessment Model of Township‐Scaled Land Subsidence Based on an Evidential Reasoning Algorithm and Fuzzy Set Theory

Land subsidence risk assessment (LSRA) is a multi‐attribute decision analysis (MADA) problem and is often characterized by both quantitative and qualitative attributes with various types of uncertainty. Therefore, the problem needs to be modeled and analyzed using methods that can handle uncertainty. In this article, we propose an integrated assessment model based on the evidential reasoning (ER) algorithm and fuzzy set theory. The assessment model is structured as a hierarchical framework that regards land subsidence risk as a composite of two key factors: hazard and vulnerability. These factors can be described by a set of basic indicators defined by assessment grades with attributes for transforming both numerical data and subjective judgments into a belief structure. The factor‐level attributes of hazard and vulnerability are combined using the ER algorithm, which is based on the information from a belief structure calculated by the Dempster‐Shafer (D‐S) theory, and a distributed fuzzy belief structure calculated by fuzzy set theory. The results from the combined algorithms yield distributed assessment grade matrices. The application of the model to the Xixi‐Chengnan area, China, illustrates its usefulness and validity for LSRA. The model utilizes a combination of all types of evidence, including all assessment information—quantitative or qualitative, complete or incomplete, and precise or imprecise—to provide assessment grades that define risk assessment on the basis of hazard and vulnerability. The results will enable risk managers to apply different risk prevention measures and mitigation planning based on the calculated risk states.     

薪酬参照体的效应研究:基于多表征的路径模型与相对重要性

参照体选择在分配公平、薪酬满意研究中扮演重要角色,而以往研究多是关注焦点对象与参照体在薪酬上的数量差异。本文认为,参照体"数量差异"并不能完整表征参照体的效应,为此提出了"信息知晓度"、"判断关联性"、"比较频率"、"数量差异"等四类表征,在理论基础上构造路径模型与研究假设。实证研究表明,信息知晓度、判断关联性正向影响特定参照体的比较频率;数量差异正向影响分配公平、薪酬水平满意,比较频率负向影响分配公平、薪酬水平满意。通过三种研究路径的比较研究证实,自我生活成本等七类参照体相对重要。未来亟需就参照体选择的相关机制在纵贯上、在不同的组织情境下及考虑个体差异等方面予以深入考察。     

Jie Du Shi Categories and Their Transition in Song Tai Zu's Period

宋太祖一朝,节度使作为以往的旧制得以延续,不过在厉行中央集权方针政策的不断推动下,节度使群体逐渐分化为多种类别,与中央的关系亲疏不同,彼此的利益也存在差异.其中开国功臣背景者受到礼遇,积极效忠的宿将一度得到笼络,新兴战功出身与潜邸、外戚出身者得到重用,其余的老藩镇则被视为异己力量而受到打压、撤销,此外的降臣等类别者仅属于形式上的点缀.随着各种削藩制度的推行,当时的节度使在分化中进而由实职向虚职过渡、转型,逐渐脱离了与地方的关系,“藩镇割据”的现象遂开始淡出历史的舞台.     

新时期农地私有的缺陷分析

在回顾中国农业制度演化的基础上,构建了农地私有影响农户收益与农地相关公共品的数理模型,分析了新时期农地私有的两大缺陷:农地产权私有化对农户收益提升存在不确定性;农地产权私有化将导致农地相关公共品供给激励的缺失。由此得出:任何建立在土地私有化基础上的制度革新对中国农业的发展都不是一个最优解。     

《鹿特丹规则》中“门到门”运输及其影响

《鹿特丹规则》的立法宗旨在于实现海上货物运输法律的统一。它对海上货物运输中相关主体的权利义务进行了重新分配,尤其是其中的"门到门"运输,加重了承运人的义务,这种权利义务的再分配,对海上保险法律制度必然会造成一定的影响。文章从《鹿特丹规则》"门到门"运输的基本内涵的研究出发,探讨了"门到门"运输下承运人义务的变化,分析了该规则的主要影响尤其是对海上保险可能造成的影响,以及海上保险法律制度的完善路径。     

犍陀罗本生雕刻的印度文化母题

犍陀罗本生雕刻作为印度文化母题的视觉化形式,以叙事性图像生动地阐释印度民间广泛推崇的价值观。犍陀罗本生雕刻的文化母题包括具有普世意义的乐善好施的传统;以轮回报应为理论基础,以孝敬忠贞为核心的伦理道德观念;奉行虔诚于神和克制苦行的修身理念。这些文化母题真实地再现了古代印度人民的社会理想、家庭关系和人生追求,是今人理解古印度文化的可靠资料。     

类文明:全球化时代中国式民主的应然走向

中国式民主是人类民主类型中的一支新秀。如同任何类型的民主一样,中国式民主包含着内在精神和外在形式两个主要方面。就其内在精神来看,中国式民主以其创新的理论体系演绎着民主的普遍精神;就其外在形式来看,中国式民主又以其独特的实现形式丰富了人类民主的具体形式。因此,中国式民主是中国的,但又是人类的。在全球化时代,发展中国式民主必须具有开放的胸襟和广纳的气魄——即具有类文明的自觉。只有准确地把握中国式民主的精神实质和具体实现形式,在坚持中国特色的同时,不断增强"类文明"的成分,才能发展好中国式民主,建设社会主义政治文明。从一定意义上讲,不断走向"类文明",正是中国式民主的基本走向和最终归宿。     

中国国民财富总量、结构及其演进模式研究——基于“自上而下-自下而上”测度范式

“财富-福利等式”表明国民财富与社会福利具有理论等价关系,是评估发展可持续性的最优指示器。我国国民财富研究相对滞后,总量测度与结构分析都亟待深化。本文基于“自上而下-自下而上”范式,依据国情优化关键参数的设定,改进了我国国民财富与分类资本估算,并剖析了省际国民财富结构以识别其演进模式。研究发现:由于资源禀赋与发展阶段有别,省际国民财富结构差异显著;随着经济发展水平提升,国民财富结构先由自然资本主导转向物质资本与人力资本共同主导,进而转变为人力资本主导,最终迈入社会资本主导。各地区应结合自身禀赋与发展阶段做好“投资组合管理”,以此来提升国民财富并优化其结构从而改善经济发展的持续性。     

Changes in Family Relationships among Substance Abusing Runaway Adolescents: A Comparison between Family and Individual Therapies

Eligible adolescents (12–17 years old) were recruited from a short‐term crisis shelter for runaway adolescents in a large Midwestern city. Adolescents (N = 179) were randomly assigned to Ecologically‐Based Family Therapy (EBFT, n = 61), the Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA, n = 57), or brief Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET, n = 61) with the primary focus on substance abuse. A significant increase in perceived family cohesion and a significant reduction in perceived family conflict were found among all treatment conditions from baseline to the 24‐month follow‐up. Adolescents who received EBFT demonstrated more improvement in family cohesion after treatment than those who received CRA or MET, and more reduction in family conflict during treatment than those who received MET.