暴力文化对青少年价值观的影响及其预防措施

人类创造着文化,文化也在创造着人类。人类在创造文化、享受文化的同时,也深受文化所制约、所引导。暴力与文化,它们之间到底存在着一个什么样的关系?暴力文化这种现象到底对当代青少年的价值观又有着什么样的影响?本文拟从以下几个方面分别阐述这两个问题。     

大学生网络论坛的心理分析

文章运用因素分析法研究剖析网络论坛所反映的大学生的心理状况。结果表明,大学生心理由10个因素构成：（1）对爱情的探讨及情感困惑;（2）对大学生活的感想及未来的思考;（3）相关信息的发布;（4）娱乐消遣;（5）抒发个人情怀;（6）关注国家发展及对时政的看法;（7）对社会现象及热点话题的评论;（8）对性的看法与渴望;（9）不满情绪的发泄;（10）对法制的个人理解与看法。不同年级、性别、专业及家庭经济状况的学生在校园网络论坛上所反映的心理状况存在差异。     

关于高斯函数的几个恒等式

对高斯函数的两个恒等式：，其中其中ｐ、ｑ是正奇数且（Ｐ，ｑ）＝１，以及Ｔｏｍ．Ｍ．Ａｐｏｓｔｏｌ的一个问题“若α＝１，２，３，４，５，６，７．证明存在一个（依赖于α的）整数ｂ，使得，作了进一步的推广，得到一般性的结论．     

水泥裂缝中开出的花朵--狂欢化解读伊恩·麦克尤恩《水泥花园》里孩子们的笑

素有"恐怖伊恩"之称的英国当代作家伊恩·麦克尤恩1978年所著小说《水泥花园》讲述了在失去正常社会秩序和规范的家庭荒原中,未成年孩子们经历的痛苦、无序、混沌的成长。运用巴赫金的狂欢化理论解读《水泥花园》,认为笑是孩子们从自我放逐走向成熟的重要线索。孩子们标志性的三次狂欢式的笑既是对权力交替的庆祝,又是对父母权威的嘲讽;既是对迎接新生的礼赞,又是对过去身份的告别。以笑为依托获得成长的孩子们,并非如评论界所言在伦理缺失的荒原上胡作非为,而是在用狂欢的庆典争取欢乐的自由,用笑声的养分培育出水泥缝中的生命之花。     

Human Capital,Social Support,and Economic Well-being among Rural,Low-income Mothers: A Latent Growth Curve Analysis

The purpose of this study was to better understand human capital and social support in the long-term economic well-being of rural, low-income mothers in the US. Three waves of data from a multi-state, longitudinal investigation tracking the well-being of rural families, known as “Rural Families Speak,” were used to test two latent growth curve models of economic well-being. Results indicated that human capital alone is not a good predictor of economic well-being over time for this sample. A model of economic well-being that includes both social support and human capital provides a better fit for these data. Findings suggest that social support is a key contributor to long-term economic success for this sample. Implications for public policy are presented.

The personality variable openness to experience as it relates to homophobia

The present study investigated personality and demographic variables of homophobic and non-homophobic individuals. Variables explored included the personality characteristics Neuroticism, Extroversion, and Openness to Experience. The following demographic variables were also explored: gender role beliefs, gender, and personal contact. Participants included 123 students from a large Western university, enrolled in introductory courses in psychology or sociology. Participants completed a questionnaire packet containing a demographic inquiry and three psychological measures-the NEO Personality Inventory, the Assessment of Attitudes Towards Lesbians and Gay Men, and the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Results revealed the variable contact as the most critical predictor of homophobia, followed by gender, and the personality variable Openness to Experience. Furthermore, those who had not had previous contact with a homosexual individual and men were significantly more homophobic. No significant differences were found among gender roles in relation to self-reported indices of homophobia. The results provide attitudinal and behavioral differences that differentiate individuals who are intolerant of homosexuality from those that are more accepting of alternative lifestyles.