强调“不忘初心”，坚持“伟大斗争”

党中央反复强调“不忘初心、牢记使命”,这是破解百年老党世界性难题的需要,是实现中华民族强起来的需要,是实现发展观上正本清源的需要,是坚定党员的理想信仰信念的需要,是落实三个“一以贯之”的需要。党中央在现阶段强调“伟大斗争”,既与中国共产党的历史有关,又与中华民族复兴关键时刻的特点有关,还与斗争本身的复杂性、长期性有关。我们今天所强调的“伟大斗争”主要来自四个方面,即重大挑战、重大风险、重大阻力、重大矛盾,其每一个方面又都包含着来自国际和来自国内的两个方向。“不忘初心、牢记使命”与“伟大斗争”是辩证统一的关系。我们要在“不忘初心、牢记使命”的指引下不断推进新时代的“伟大斗争”。     

“互联网+”视域下将众筹模式融入高校学术讲座研究

为促使高校办学模式的创新性发展,将众筹理念引入传统学术讲座,以期通过众筹来推动解决高校办学面临的资金、师资、创新能力等方面的不足。高校众筹学术讲座主要包含资金众筹、师资众筹、互联网+的运用等三个维度,合理引入众筹模式有利于提升当前高校办学资金、人才培养、教学环境等各方面的条件,同时有效提高当代大学生学习的自主性和自觉性,对推动高校的创新性发展具有重要的意义。     

企业动态营销能力构成维度及其路径关系——基于扎根理论的探索性研究

运用扎根理论方法,在中国市场环境和营销实践背景下,通过开放编码、主轴编码和选择性编码和模型构建,对于动态营销能力的构成要素及其相互关系进行质性分析.研究结果表明,动态营销能力涵盖市场感知、市场知识吸收、渠道联盟、顾客联结、市场创新、品牌价值提升和响应顾客能力七个维度,构建了动态营销能力结构体系及其路径关系模型,并进一步揭示了各个能力的作用机理,动态营销能力的维度彼此相互关联,通过知识创造、资源联合与整合以及资源释放过程共同影响企业的绩效与可持续竞争优势.     

中华民族建设中的认同问题

把分散的多民族打造成一个整体的国家民族建设,是近代以来世界各国发展的一个普遍倾向,中国也不例外。中华民族建设实际上也就是"多元一体"建设,一方面要包容文化和族体的多样性,一方面又要认同国家的政治和文化,实现国家层面的一体化。铸牢中华民族共同体意识首先要从文化认同上表现出来。中华文化认同包括三个层面:各民族的自我认同、各民族之间的相互认同和中华民族的一体性认同。中华民族是一个文化共同体,同时也是一个基于政治、经济和地域等因素的利益共同体和命运共同体。因此铸牢中华民族共同体意识,除了讲文化认同之外,还要讲中华民族的政治认同,既包括国家认同,也包括利益认同与命运认同。自觉认识和发挥中国民族建设的优势,高扬中华民族的伟大旗帜,努力培育和铸牢中华民族共同体意识,是当前我国民族理论工作的一项重要责任。     

建立国家综合配套改革试验区的理论基础与基本条件探索

一、引言 继上海浦东新区、天津滨海新区被国务院批准为国家综合配套改革试验区之后,2007年6月7日,国家发改委下发《国家发展改革委关于批准重庆市和成都市设立全国统筹城乡综合配套改革试验区的通知》,正式批准重庆市和成都市建立全国统筹城乡综合配套改革试验区.     

服务经济发展对城市新区空间结构的影响研究——以天津滨海新区为例

正一、研究背景(一)城市新区随着城镇化的快速推进和对外开放的不断深化,城市新区的建设开发成为我国当前城市发展的一个重要突破口。城市新区位于大城市边缘,拥有自己的"母城",以城市整体为依托,承担中心城区的部分功能,与其互动协调发展,但是实行特殊的经济政策与管理体制,具有相对完整和独立的城市功能。超越传统的带有计划经济色彩的工业开发区和产业园区建设,追求产城融合的综合性新     

中美社会工作职业道德规范差异分析

2012年12月28日,民政部出台了《社会工作者职业道德指引》,这是我国第一部由政府制定的有关社会工作从业者的职业道德约束制度,为我国社会工作的专业化与标准化提供了重要参考,对推动社会工作在我国的健康发展也有重要意义.美国作为社会工作发展程度与标准化较高的国家,其职业道德规范也比较完善,是西方社会工作发展及社会工作标准化的典范.对比中美社会工作职业道德规范的差异,有助于我们更好地认识我国社会工作发展的现状及其独特性,也有助于找准我国社会工作的发展方向.     

公务员责任实现机制探析

行政责任的履行和实现是一个制度化的责任规范过程,是对客观责任进行设置并加以监控的过程,也是取得公务员个人主观责任意识与责任认同并在此基础上作出主动行为选择的过程。行政责任的实现是依赖于一套完整的动力系统实现的,这个动力系统既包括公务员个体主观道德意识、职业价值观所决定的内在动力,也包括对行政责任实施管理和监控的制度所形成的外部动力,只有内部动力与外部动力达成统一和协调,行政责任才能得以有效实现。     

欺诈发行证券罪的立法反思与教义学阐释——以《刑法修正案(十一)》为视角

《刑法修正案(十一)》对欺诈发行证券罪进行了较大幅度的修订,扩大了犯罪行为对象的范围,同时新增控股股东、实际控制人作为独立行为主体,实现了控股股东、实际控制人组织、指使行为的正犯化。立法层面的调整具有现实价值,同时也带来了法律适用中的困惑与争议。在行为对象方面,“发行文件”以及“国务院依法认定的其他证券”的表述均具有开放性,需要立足于前置法,对上述概念进行限缩解释。在行为主体方面,控股股东、实际控制人在共同犯罪中的行为定性存在争议。应贯彻追究“首恶”的基本立场,加大对控股股东、实际控制人等欺诈发行幕后行为主体的刑事打击力度,认定控股股东、实际控制人与直接责任人员成立共同正犯,以实现罪刑法定的基本原则。     

宗教事务依法管理的路径及基础——以四川藏区依法治理为视角

Under the situation that traditional beliefs have remained basically unchanged while the social economy has developed and population mobility has increased, with the trend of an in-creasing diversity in beliefs, and an increasing number of religious followers and temples, the management of religious affairs has become more difficult. In ethnic areas, the speed of moderniza-tion has accelerated, ethnic interactions are fre-quent, and the beneficial conflict or cultural con-flict among various ethnic groups has become nor-mal; the impact of modernity, ways of life, the value and ideals of the temples’ traditional culture and educational model brings new social pressure for the monks who are adapting to modernization, and making a leap in development while safeguard-ing traditional rituals, culture, religious education and development. The number of criminal cases involving monks has increased, which brings a strong negative influence to the religious followers in Tibetan areas. All these factors are directly in-fluencing the stability and harmonious development of the Tibetan areas. As the second-largest Tibetan area, the geo-graphical location of Sichuan’s Tibetan areas is u-nique. In ancient times, the policy of “keeping the Tibetan areas stable means keeping Kham sta-ble at first” had been an important measure for the central government to manage all of the Tibetan ar-eas. From the Qing dynasty to the present times, it still has a practical use, and even has special val-ue in the process of safeguarding the “long-term stability of Sichuan”, especially when the people have but a hazy understanding of the relationship between the freedom of faith and managing reli-gious affairs according to the law in Tibetan areas, and one needs to have a legal response to it. Hence, “keeping Kham stable” needs to depend on the law, and legal means should be taken to safeguard the harmony and stability of the Tibetan areas in Sichuan. Management of the religious affairs according to the law is an inevitable requirement for China to promote the goal of ruling the country by law, com-prehensively deepen reform, and promote the mod-ernization of the country’s governance system and capability. Based on an active response to the guidance principle of strengthening the manage-ment of religious affairs according to the law pro-posed by the Central Government, and the Sichuan Provincial Government, we should standardize reli-gious activities and affairs, insist on a combination of legal management and policy guidance, adopt various measures, search for a practicable path to realize the significant goal of managing the religious affairs according to the law in Tibetan areas of Si-chuan. This article proposes some methods of man-aging the religious affairs according to the law as follows:1 ) To insist on the CPC’s leadership in reli-gious work and management of religious affairs;2 ) to actively and reliably promote the systematic con-
struction of the legalization of religious affairs;3 ) to insist on the combination of legal management and policy guidance;4 ) to encourage the public to manage religious affairs according to law; 5 ) to standardize the scale and number of monks by u-sing new methods of management;6 ) to strengthen the role of the “four troops” ( Party and Govern-ment leading cadres,ethnic religious work cadres, ethnic minority cadres and talents, and religious believers ) , especially religious believers; 7 ) to make full use of the regulatory framework of the Buddhist community; 8 ) to create conditions for those monks who wish to return to secular life;9 ) to distinguish the boundary between normal and il-legal religious activities, between folk custom and extreme religious concepts; 10 ) to identify and distinguish between “monks and lay people”, and“ordinary cases and religious cases”. At present, there are four foundations for managing religious affairs according to the law:1 ) the idea that freedom of faith is not only one’s right, but also one’s duty has gradually enjoyed popular support;2 ) there is a good policy base for managing religious affairs according to the law;3 ) there is a relatively strong theoretical basis for managing religious affairs according to the law;4 ) there exists good legal support for managing reli-gious affairs according to the law.