Work stress and alcohol effects: a test of stress-induced drinking

Drawing on both tension reduction and social learning theories, we hypothesized that work stressors lead to increased distress, which in turn promotes problematic alcohol use among vulnerable individuals. Vulnerable individuals are hypothesized to possess few personal and social resources for responding adaptively to work-related stressors and distress and to hold positive expectancies for alcohol's effects. We tested our model in a random sample of 574 employed adults, using a combination of path analytic and hierarchical moderated regression techniques. Results revealed no support for a simple tension reduction model of work stress-induced drinking and only limited support for a social learning model. We conclude that a much more circumscribed view of the etiologic role of work stress in problematic alcohol use is indicated.     

A Review of The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and The Institute of Social Research

Theory and Society -     

Time preferences for products and attributes and the adoption of technologydriven consumer durable innovations

In this paper, consumers' time preferences for technology-driven consumer durable innovations are examined. We calculate from survey data rates of time preference for products and product attributes. Several propositions related to these constructs are empirically tested. The results show that, over subjects, the product rate is different from the economic discount rate which captures time preferences for money, that product rates of time preference vary by individual, by product and over time, and that attribute level rates of time preference may vary by attribute.     

Children after Divorce: Whose Rights? Whose Responsibility?

Concern about the increasing welfare bill for supporting parents and the growing number of mothers and children living in poverty after divorce or separation has recently led Governments to seek new strategies to enforce maintenance payments. A major emphasis in these arguments has been that noncustodial parents (usually fathers) have a responsibility to provide economic support for their children, and that children, mothers and the community have a right to expect this support. At the same time, there has been an increased concern by fathers for their rights to custody and access to their children after divorce or separation. These two concerns, however, have tended to be treated as separate issues, and little attempt has been made to examine the possible interaction between the two, or to examine systematically the respective rights and responsibilities of mothers, fathers, children and the community. These issues are examined here in the context of an analysis of interpersonal rights and responsibilities for financial support and child care.