Reframing sociologies of ethnicity and migration in encounters with Chinese London

In this paper I argue that the intersecting sociologies of ethnicity and migration work from a series of interconnected blind spots hindering effective analysis of the current UK situation. Both operate analytically within the limitations of an ‘immigrant problem’ framework; are overinvested in state agendas; privilege a nation state analysis; are narrowly focused on distributions of migrant bodies, and on receiving, at the expense of sending, contexts. Exploring these limitations with data derived from a modest small‐scale qualitative study of young Chinese migrants in London, I argue for a reframing along four dimensions. Firstly, in an era of elite migration, sociology could reach beyond its immigrant problem framework and open up to a broader range of UK migrant ethnicities and circumstances. Secondly, a stronger focus on cities as the scale on which lives are lived, and through which diverse streams of translocal activity are routed, would open new avenues of sociological exploration. Thirdly, including translocal activities connected with distributions of ethnic migrant bodies, such as capital transfers, would broaden its focus, taking migration and ethnicity more centrally into the analysis of globalization as one of its constituting practices. Finally, paying attention to sending, as well as arrival cities, reveals migrants’ thinking and shapes the ways in which they live, as my data shows. The Chinese are both one of the UK's neglected minorities, and one of its fastest growing populations. They are a good example of new UK migrants and they bring globalization's realignment with the rising significance of China to the UK.     

Choice: what,when and why? Exploring the importance of choice to disabled people

Extending choice and control over public services is central to current policies in England. Such policies have immense potential for independence and well‐being. However, it is still not clear how disabled people conceptualise choices, what choices are important, for which groups of people, in what areas of life and why. This paper presents findings from the first phase of a longitudinal qualitative study of choice and control over the life‐course. Semi‐structured interviews were carried out with 111 participants including disabled young people with progressive conditions; their parents; adults and older people with fluctuating support needs and those experiencing sudden deterioration in health. The findings suggest that while most people across all study groups wanted to be able to make choices in all areas of their lives, there are significant differences in the importance they attach to specific choices. The findings have implications for service reforms and identify some policy and practice issues that need to be addressed.     

Clinical correlates and repetition of self-harming behaviors among female adolescent victims of sexual abuse

This study investigated self-harming behaviors in 149 female adolescent victims of sexual abuse, first, by determining the rates of nine types of self-mutilating behavior at intake and nine months later and, second, by investigating comorbidity of clinical correlates associated with these behaviors. The adolescents were divided into three groups according to level of self-mutilating behavior and then compared on symptom self-reports; 62.1% of the adolescents engaged in at least one self-mutilating behavior. A graded relation was observed between level of self-mutilating behavior and rate, and total number of clinical disorders. At nine month follow-up, one in four teenagers still reported a moderate or high level of self-harm. The need for systematic assessment and intervention of self-mutilating behaviors is discussed.     

An application of multi-discipline group working

The paper describes the application of the concept of working in multi-discipline groups in a company manufacturing air-handling fans and customised air-handling equipment on a jobbing type basis. The reasons for organising along these lines is explained together with the method used for formulation of groups. Operating experiences with this form of organisation are described and the results of an attitude survey of operatives and supervisors are discussed.     

Toward a Better Understanding of the Use of Psychodynamically-Informed Treatment with Latinos: Findings from Clinician Experience

Latinos in the United States constitute a significant and sizable population that mental health professionals must serve appropriately. Therefore, the question of what types of mental health treatment approaches are useful in working with this population is of increasing concern. A strong sentiment against the use of psychodynamic treatment with Latinos persists in the literature in the absence of rigorous data that would support such a stance. Thus, it is important to examine systematically the use of psychodynamically-informed treatment with Latinos in order to address the question of its potential relevance and utility with this population. This article presents the results of a qualitative study of Latino therapists who employ psychodynamic approaches with Latino clients. Findings suggest that the clinicians interviewed have expanded the psychodynamic framework to include a flexible focus on the relationship, consideration of each client as an individual, and an acknowledgment and understanding of external reality and its impact on the client. Modifications these clinicians have made in technique, such as increased self-disclosure, support and maximize this expansion of the frame. Simultaneously, such modifications enhance the cultural sensitivity of these clinicians' work and are congruent with contemporary psychodynamically-informed relational theories.