The War of the Words: How Linguistic Differences in Reporting Shape Perceptions of Terrorism

In four studies, we demonstrate that subtle linguistic differences in news reporting are sufficient to influence whether people interpret violent acts as patriotism or terrorism. In Study 1, a content analysis of newspaper articles describing violence in Iraq revealed that words implying destruction and devious intent were typically used in reference to violent actions associated with Iraq and opponents of the United States, while more benign words were used in reference to the United States and its allies. These observed differences in word usage establish schemas that guide perception of violence as terrorism or patriotism, thereby affecting people's attitudes toward (Study 2) and memory for (Studies 3 and 4) violent events. Implications for the media's impact on public policy are discussed.     

THE METHODOLOGICAL INCLINATIONS OF GENDER SCHOLARSHIP IN MAINSTREAM SOCIOLOGY JOURNALS

This article examines the types of research methods sociologists studying women and gender use in articles published in mainstream journals. The research is based on an analysis of 1,826 gender-content articles published between 1984 and 1993 in 15 major sociology journals. Specifically, we explore whether feminist-oriented articles use different types of data, data collection methods, and statistical techniques than other articles addressing women and gender. The relationship between the rank of an academic journal, author's sex, and type of research method is also examined. We find that a large majority of gender-content articles are based on secondary, quantitative data. When the first author is a man, articles are somewhat more likely to be based on secondary data and to use quantitative statistical techniques. In general, we find that feminist research in the discipline is based on a melange of methodological approaches, reflecting the contested nature of feminist epistemologies.     

Tests on the Equality of Two Multiple Correlation Coefficients

Asymptotic tests are suggested for testing the equality of two multiple correlation coefficients calculated from a single sample from a multivariate normal distribution. An F test is possible only when the two dependent variables coincide and one set of independent variables is a subset of the second set. Tests are compared by simulation for situations in which the F test is inapplicable. Special attention is paid to cases in which asymptotic normality of the test statistics does not hold.     

Maternal Differential Treatment and Child Adjustment: A Multi-informant Approach

The study aimed to replicate previous links with children's adjustment as well as using children's reports of maternal differential treatment (MDT) to test whether difference scores or favouritism scores demonstrate stronger links with child outcome. Finally, it tested for a unique prediction of children's adjustment from distinct aspects and informants of MDT. The sample consisted of 173 working- and middle-class English families with two children aged four to eight years. Mothers provided reports of the mother–child relationship, and both mothers and fathers provided reports of the children's problematic behaviour. The children also provided reports of parent–child relationships and perceived favouritism via a puppet interview. Results confirmed moderate links between MDT and children's adjustment and showed that difference scores provided a better prediction of adjustment than did the favouritism scores. Finally, the results showed that mothers' reports of differential positive feelings were the most salient aspect of MDT for older siblings whereas mothers' reports of negative feelings and positive discipline were the most salient aspects of MDT for younger siblings.     

A clinical evaluation of four alternative telemedicine systems.

A comparison was made of four alternative telecommunication systems used in delivering primary health care to remote populations. The media were color television, black and white television, still frame black and white television, and hands-free telephone. The patient population was that of a large organization in a Canadian province, a major component of a societal system. Over 1000 patients who came to a clinic seeking medical attention were examined remotely by one of the four systems. In addition, they were examined in the physical presence of a doctor at the clinic. The diagnoses, patient management programs, etc., of the clinic physician were used as the basis for comparison. We found no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy, proportion of supporting investigations requested, e.g., laboratory tests and X rays, time taken for the diagnostic consultations and the effectiveness of patient management across the four communication modes. On the contrary, in some instances it was found that behavior across the modes was significantly similar. Even patient attitudes showed only a slight preference for the more sensory rich modes of communication. It was concluded that there is little to distinguish the effectiveness of the four telecommunication modes when used for remote diagnostic consultations. Therefore, the cheapest mode is the most cost-effective. Phase four of the research program will compare the effects of the two least costly modes, still frame television and hands-free telephone, in an operational system in northern Ontario.