A Study of the Properties of the Item Count Technique

The item count technique is an indirect questioning techniquethat is used to estimate the proportion of people who have engagedin stigmatizing behavior. This technique is expected to yielda more appropriate estimate than the ordinary direct questioningtechnique because it requests respondents to indicate, basedon a list of several items, simply the number of items thatare applicable to them, including the target key item. An experimentalweb survey was conducted in an attempt to compare the directquestioning technique and the item count technique. Comparedwith the direct questioning technique, the item count techniqueyielded higher estimates of the proportion of shoplifters bynearly 10 percentage points, whereas the difference betweenthe estimates using these two techniques was mostly insignificantwith respect to innocuous blood donation. The survey resultssuggest that in the item count technique respondents tend toreport fewer total behaviors compared to the direct questioncase. This tendency is more pronounced in the case of longeritem lists. Three domain estimators for the item count techniquewere compared, and the cross-based method appeared to be themost appropriate method. Large differences in domain estimatesfor shoplifting between the item count and direct questioningtechniques were found among female respondents, middle-agedrespondents, respondents living in urban areas, and highly-educatedrespondents.     

Cross-Cultural Judgments of Spontaneous Facial Expressions of Emotion

We report data concerning cross-cultural judgments of emotion in spontaneously produced facial expressions. Americans, Japanese, British, and International Students in the US reliably attributed emotions to the expressions of Olympic judo athletes at the end of a match for a medal, and at two times during the subsequent medal ceremonies. There were some observer culture differences in absolute attribution agreement rates, but high cross-cultural agreement in differences in attribution rates across expressions (relative agreement rates). Moreover, we operationalized signal clarity and demonstrated that it was associated with agreement rates similarly in all cultures. Finally, we obtained judgments of won-lost match outcomes and medal finish, and demonstrated that the emotion judgments were associated with accuracy in judgments of outcomes. These findings demonstrated that members of different cultures reliably judge spontaneously expressed emotions, and that across observer cultures, lower absolute agreement rates are related to noise produced by non-emotional facial behaviors. Also, the findings suggested that observers of different cultures utilize the same facial cues when judging emotions, and that the signal value of facial expressions is similar across cultures.     

Spouses’ time allocation to pro-environmental activities: who is saving the environment at home?

Family members often perform pro-environmental activities in a cooperative manner. We assume there are two decision-makers in a household, and develop an economic model of pro-environmental activities based on the household production framework. Our theoretical analysis shows how the opportunity cost of time, family structure, and environmental concerns affect an individual’s participation in pro-environmental activities. Using data from the Japanese General Social Survey 2002, we conducted an empirical analysis and found that spouses with lower time costs tended to allocate more time to specific pro-environmental activities. It was further revealed that family structure determines participation in pro-environmental activities.     

A New Test to Measure Emotion Recognition Ability: Matsumoto and Ekman's Japanese and Caucasian Brief Affect Recognition Test (JACBART)

In this article, we report the development of a new test designed to measure individual differences in emotion recognition ability (ERA), five studies examining the reliability and validity of the scores produced using this test, and the first evidence for a correlation between ERA measured by a standardized test and personality. Utilizing Matsumoto and Ekman's (1988) Japanese and Caucasian Facial Expressions of Emotion (JACFEE) and Neutral Faces (JACNeuF), we call this measure the Japanese and Caucasian Brief Affect Recognition Test (JACBART). The JACBART improves on previous measures of ERA by (1) using expressions that have substantial validity and reliability data associated with them, (2) including posers of two visibly different races (3) balanced across seven universal emotions (4) with equal distribution of poser race and sex across emotions (5) in a format that eliminates afterimages associated with fast exposures. Scores derived using the JACBART are reliable, and three studies demonstrated a correlation between ERA and the personality constructs of Openness and Conscientiousness, while one study reports a correlation with Extraversion and Neuroticism.     

Acknowledgment of the Editorial Assistants,Book Review Editors,and Associate Editors

Since the extensive work by Burns and Mitchell, many economists have interpreted economic fluctuations in terms of business-cycle phases. Given this, we argue that, in addition to usual model-selection criteria currently used in the profession, the adequacy of a univariate macroeconomic time series model should be based on its ability to replicate two important business-cycle features of the U.S. data—duration and amplitude. We propose several checks for whether univariate statistical models generate business-cycle features observed in U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) and find that many popular nonlinear models for the log of real GDP are no better at replicating the duration and amplitude features of the data than a simple ARIMA(1, 1, 0).     

Correction to: contrasting effects of urbanization on arboreal and ground-dwelling land snails: role of trophic interactions and habitat fragmentation

Urban Ecosystems - The original version of the article unfortunately contained mistakes in the legends of Fig. 3. The legends (1) Blue square: Euhadra brandtii sapporo, ground is changed...     

Matsumoto and Ekman's Japanese and Caucasian Facial Expressions of Emotion (JACFEE): Reliability Data and Cross-National Differences

Substantial research has documented the universality of several emotional expressions. However, recent findings have demonstrated cultural differences in level of recognition and ratings of intensity. When testing cultural differences, stimulus sets must meet certain requirements. Matsumoto and Ekman's Japanese and Caucasian Facial Expressions of Emotion (JACFEE) is the only set that meets these requirements. The purpose of this study was to obtain judgment reliability data on the JACFEE, and to test for possible cross-national differences in judgments as well. Subjects from Hungary, Japan, Poland, Sumatra, United States, and Vietnam viewed the complete JACFEE photo set and judged which emotions were portrayed in the photos and rated the intensity of those expressions. Results revealed high agreement across countries in identifying the emotions portrayed in the photos, demonstrating the reliability of the JACFEE. Despite high agreement, cross-national differences were found in the exact level of agreement for photos of anger, contempt, disgust, fear, sadness, and surprise. Cross-national differences were also found in the level of intensity attributed to the photos. No systematic variation due to either preceding emotion or presentation order of the JACFEE was found. Also, we found that grouping the countries into a Western/Non-Western dichotomy was not justified according to the data. Instead, the cross-national differences are discussed in terms of possible sociopsychological variables that influence emotion judgments.     

Distortionary Taxation and Optimal Public Spending on Productive Activities

Using a general‐equilibrium model with endogenous factor supplies, this article investigates the provision of factor‐augmenting public inputs. Such inputs are intermediate goods that affect production functions in a collective manner and give rise to increasing returns. Unlike with collective consumption goods, deviation from the first‐best condition for a public input is inappropriate if taxes are set optimally. When taxes are not optimal, a second‐best rule must include a feedback effect on revenue as well as the deadweight cost of taxes. Implications for benefit‐cost analysis and for interpretation of estimates of the social returns to public capital are explored.     

Lower bounds on bayes factors for a linear regression model

This paper develops a Bayesian analysis of testing linear parameter restictions in a normal regression model. Instead of searching for a suitable "objective" prior for such a test, several interesting classes of informative priors are postulated, and the lower bounds on the Bayes factors are derived.