The Extensively Corrected Score for Measurement Error Models

In measurement error problems, two major and consistent estimation methods are the conditional score and the corrected score. They are functional methods that require no parametric assumptions on mismeasured covariates. The conditional score requires that a suitable sufficient statistic for the mismeasured covariate can be found, while the corrected score requires that the object score function can be estimated without bias. These assumptions limit their ranges of applications. The extensively corrected score proposed here is an extension of the corrected score. It yields consistent estimations in many cases when neither the conditional score nor the corrected score is feasible. We demonstrate its constructions in generalized linear models and the Cox proportional hazards model, assess its performances by simulation studies and illustrate its implementations by two real examples.     

Sensitivity Analyses of the Economic and Economic Statistical Designs of the Multivariate Synthetic T2 Chart

This article performs a sensitivity analyses of the synthetic T² chart using fractional factorial design, which integrates the interaction effects. We are interested in the effects of the input parameters on the optimal cost, chart's parameters, and average run lengths. We also look at the input parameters responsible for the increase in cost and improvement in statistical performance under statistical constraints, and investigate how the input parameters influence the binding effect of the statistical constraints. The sensitivity analyses of the synthetic T² chart are compared with that of the Hotelling's T² chart, and parameters responsible for the cost advantage of the synthetic T² chart are identified.     

Random Level-Shift Time Series Models,ARIMA Approximations,and Level-Shift Detection

The main purpose of this article is to assess the performance of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models when occasional level shifts occur in the time series under study. A random level-shift time series model that allows the level of the process to change occasionally is introduced. Between two consecutive changes, the process behaves like the usual autoregressive moving average (ARMA) process. In practice, a series generated from a random level-shift ARMA (RLARMA) model may be misspecified as an ARIMA process. The efficiency of this ARIMA approximation with respect to estimation of current level and forecasting is investigated. The results of examining a special case of an RLARMA model indicate that the ARIMA approximations are inadequate for estimating the current level, but they are robust for forecasting future observations except when there is a very low frequency of level shifts or when the series are highly negatively correlated. A level-shift detection procedure is presented to handle the low-frequency level-shift phenomena, and its usefulness in building models for forecasting is demonstrated.     

Rule-Based Expert Systems and Linear Models: An Empirical Comparison of Learning-By-Examples Methods*

Building models of expert decision-making behavior from examples of experts’ decisions continues to receive considerable research attention. In the 1960's and 70's, linear models derived by statistical methods were studied extensively. More recently, rule-based expert systems derived by induction algorithms have been the focus of attention. Few studies compare the two approaches. This paper reports on a study that compared linear models derived by logistic regression with rule-based systems produced by two induction algorithms—ID3 and the genetic algorithm. The techniques performed comparably in modeling the experts at one task, graduate admissions, but differed significantly at a second task, bidder selection.     

Notes and Communications REPLANNING FREQUENCIES FOR MASTER PRODUCTION SCHEDULES

Updating production plans typically is achieved by rolling the planning horizon forward one period at a time, each time including the latest information in order to determine the best course of action to pursue in the present period. Theoretical planning-horizon studies have identified the conditions by which the production decisions in the current and some specified number of future periods remain optimal given some set of future demands. Motivated by these findings, this study addresses the replanning frequency in a hierarchical production planning problem where no planning-horizon theorems are available. In this problem the aggregate production plan and the master production schedule are linked by a rolling-horizon practice. Empirical experimentation indicates that under certain cost and demand conditions the master production schedule need not be updated every period. If a schedule does not need to be updated for several periods, the schedule for these periods can be frozen to provide stability for planning components at lower levels in the bill of material of the products. The results of this study thus provide some reference for the determination of the frozen portion of the master production schedule.