Some specifics on the brain drain from the Andean region

An analysis of the brain drain from the Andean countries of Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru to the United States is presented. The data are from a survey of 62 persons from those countries who are currently residing in the United States and are listed in the current edition of "American Men and Women of Science". The reasons why they left their country of origin and are staying in the United States are considered. (summary in FRE, SPA)     

Errata

My article entitled "Replications, Significance Tests, and Confidencein Findings in Survey Research" (POQ 47:261–69) is marredby a serious error which has implications for most of the contentsof the article. Table 1, which is adapted from a table published by Rosenthaland Hall,¹ gives the critical values of required for significance at several levels; itdoes not give the critical values of Trans , or () (). Rather, the latter should be referreddirectly to a table giving the areas under the normal curve,or, in other words, it should be treated as though it were aZ from a single-sample test. This means that the comparisons of significance test resultsfrom pooled data and from series of replications in Tables 2and 3 do not support the conclusion that using a replicate designrather than pooled data lessens the probability of Type II errors.In the case of Table 2, the probability from the pooled sampleis lower than the correct one from the series of replications,and in the case of Table 3, the probabilities are about thesame. The data in Table 4 illustrate a kind of situation in whicha replicate design may be the preferred one for another reason.The replicate design allows an estimate of sampling variabilityfrom the actual variability among a small number of samples,whereas the single-sample and pooled-sample significance testresults may be substantially in error due to the unstable meaningof the "zero" assigned to the reference category for the dummyvariables. However, the estimated probability for the arrayof replications should be .05 rather than the probability reported. Another error with less serious implications for the paper asa whole is that the third "alternative formula" for Trans is incorrect as printed. One of thefirst two formulas, or () (), should be used instead. The major error resulted from a misreading of the paper by Rosenthaland Hall. I apologize to Rosenthal and Hall and to any readersof my paper who have used the table of critical values incorrectlyin their research.     

Public opinion and the privatization of welfare: some theoretical implications

The social policy of the Thatcher government is characterized by an abrupt shift in the direction of the private sector. To what extent does this reflect what people want? The Institute of Economic Affairs conclude from the only suitable national opinion survey that such a move is strongly supported. Our reanalysis of their data shows that this strand in public opinion can coexist with, and need not contradict, an equal public enthusiasm for state welfare. Such results have important implications for our understanding of social policy. We conclude, therefore, with a discussion of contrasting marxist and liberal accounts which seeks to show that the evidence of ambivalence in popular attitudes about the welfare state supports particular developments in theory.     

Maternal care receptivity--an innovative approach for the evaluation of MCH services

Despite rapid expansion in the maternal and child health and family planning services, there have been few attempts made to study the extent of utilisation of these services and their impact. The present study reports a simple method evolved in the quantification of utilisation of maternal care services (called maternal care receptivity - MCR), the relationship of factors such as age, parity, caste of the women and the distance of the health centre on the MCR and the impact of MCR on perinatal and neonatal mortalities. An inverse relationship was observed between MCR and perinatal and neonatal mortality rates and the two rates were three times less among babies born to mothers with high MCR scores compared to those with poor MCR scores.     

Are sex differences in nonverbal and verbal behavior generalizable to mentally retarded persons?

Sex differences in three communication behaviors consistently found to be more common among females than males — smiling, gazing at one's partner, and sentence complexity — were examined through analysis of interviews with 78 institutionalized mentally retarded adults. While females were significantly more likely than males to smile or laugh, and tended to use longer, more complex sentences, the commonly observed sex difference in gazing failed to generalize to a retarded sample. These findings clarify limits on the generalizability of sex differences beyond college students and other normal populations.This research was partially supported by a grant to the Texas Tech University Research and Training Center in Mental Retardation from the Rehabilitation Services Administration, Department of Health Education, and Welfare.