现实与科学:现代主流经济学研究范式的选择

21世纪初,主流经济学的发展面临巨大挑战.通过对前提假设的现实意义、分析工具的使用以及方法论的演进等方面的客观分析,来寻找主流经济学遭遇"非难"的深层原因,可以明确经济理论存在的真正意义,并由此进一步探讨主流经济学从科学主义走向科学的必然性.     

浅谈生本教育课堂教学中如何通过评价促进有效教学

生本教育理念为师生营造了一个开放式的课堂学习氛围.文章结合生本教育理念与有效教学理念,从实践的角度出发,探讨在这种教学模式下,计算机生本课堂中组织有效教学的策略,并着重阐述通过设计合理的教学评价来保证教学的有效性.     

文旅融合背景下海派传统工艺美术IP资源开发策略研究

传统工艺美术IP资源开发是激活文旅产业的密钥,亦是推动非遗文化由资源变资产、遗产变财产的产业化发展重要途径。文旅融合背景下海派传统工艺美术IP资源开发可以从产业融合、交流融合、服务融合、空间融合四个维度进行：一是继续开发开放海派传统工艺美术IP资源,协同推动文旅产业深度融合发展。二是用好用活“节、赛、会”资源,加快推进长三角“非遗+旅游”交流融合。三是积极推动数字新基建建设,构建海派非遗文旅融合生态服务体系。四是坚持功能提升,增加城乡区域文化辐射力,推动海派非遗文旅空间融合。     

Do Some Students Need Special Protection From Research on Sex and Trauma? New Evidence for Young Adult Resilience in “Sensitive Topics” Research

Institutional review boards (IRBs) have expressed concerns that certain individuals or groups, such as participants who are younger, ethnic minorities, or who have certain psychological or personality traits, may be particularly distressed when participating in “sensitive topics” research. This study examined the effects of several demographic and individual difference factors (i.e., age, sex, ethnicity, religiosity, Big Five personality traits, and baseline psychological distress levels) on reactions to participation in sensitive topics research. Participants were 504 undergraduates who completed an extensive battery of either trauma/sex questionnaires or cognitive tests and rated their positive and negative emotional reactions and the perceived benefits and mental costs of participating. They also compared research participation to normal life stressors. Our findings indicated that individual difference and demographic risk factors do not increase participant distress after participating in sex/trauma research over and above that experienced after participating in traditionally minimal-risk cognitive tasks. Participants generally found research participation less distressing than normal life stressors and even enjoyable.     

Shifting STEM Stereotypes? Considering the Role of Peer and Teacher Gender

This study builds on research on the power of counter‐stereotypical cues, as well as intergroup contact theory, to consider whether interactions with a female teacher and female peers in a high school engineering classroom decrease male students' gender/science, technology, engineering, and math stereotypical beliefs and whether this varies according to the initial strength of their stereotypical views. Analyses reveal that among male students who initially reject stereotypes of male superiority, more female peers in the classroom leads to a further decrease in their stereotypical views by the end of the year. In contrast, boys who held strong stereotypical beliefs became less stereotypical by the end of the course when they had a female teacher. Implications for future research and current educational reforms are discussed.