南充市城区已婚育龄妇女二孩生育意愿研究

2018年4—5月在四川省南充市城区采用便利抽样,以已婚且未育或已育一个小孩的育龄妇女为研究对象,采用自制匿名问卷,以面对面的形式收集资料,了解实施全面二孩政策后南充市育龄妇女的生育意愿,为南充市的人口研究提供参考依据。在213名调查对象中,56人(26.3%)有二孩生育意愿,140人(65.7%)无二孩生育意愿,17人(8.0%)不确定是否生育二孩。南充市被调查者的理想子女个数均值为1.46,意愿子女个数均值为1.27。不同文化程度(χ2=7.512)、配偶月收入(χ2=12.641)、理想子女数(χ2=66.401)、一孩性别(χ2=5.441)的育龄妇女间二孩生育意愿差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,第一个孩子性别为女孩(OR=2.641,P=0.021)、丈夫月收入越高(OR=1.761,P=0.028)、理想子女数多于1个(OR=29.040,P<0.001)的育龄妇女更有意愿生育二孩。南充市城区二孩生育意愿处于较低水平,经济收入、理想子女数、一孩性别会影响育龄妇女的二孩生育意愿。全面二孩政策对于促进育龄妇女生育二孩的效应有限,应当建立相关的配套政策,以促进全面二孩政策的实施。     

Moving in or Breaking Up? The Role of Distance in the Development of Romantic Relationships

Most romantic relationships start with a living apart together (LAT) phase during which the partners live in two separate households. Over time, a couple might decide to move in together, to separate, or to remain together while maintaining their nonresidential status. This study investigates the competing risks that partners in a LAT relationship will experience the transition to coresidence or to separation. We consider the amount of time LAT partners have to travel to see each other to be a key determinant of relationship development. For our statistical analyses, we use seven waves of the German Family Panel Pairfam (2008/2009–2014/2015) and analyze couples in the age group 20–40 years. We distinguish between short-distance relationships (the partners have to travel less than one hour) and long-distance relationships (the partners have to travel one hour or more). Estimating a competing risks model, we find that couples in long-distance relationships are more likely to separate than those living in close proximity. By contrast, the probability of experiencing a transition to coresidence is lower for LAT couples in long-distance than for those in short-distance relationships. Interaction analyses reveal that distance seems to be irrelevant for the relationship development of couples with two nonemployed (unemployed, in education or other inactive) partners.     

城市化、高等教育扩张对地区收入差距的影响 ——基于中国省级面板数据的实证研究

利用2002—2014年全国31个省市的面板数据考察城市化、高等教育扩张对地区收入差距的影响.结果显示:从全国层面来看,城市化对缩小地区间收入差距具有显著的消极作用,当地区城市化水平提高时,地区收入差距扩大;高等教育扩张对缩小地区收入差距具有显著的正向作用.从不同地区结果来看,东部地区城市化水平普遍较高,对地区收入差距的影响并不显著,而高等教育扩张对地区收入差距具有显著的负向作用.中部地区的结果与东部地区的结果基本一致.相比于东中部地区,西部地区城市化水平较低,其水平的提高不利于地区间收入差距的缩小,而高等教育扩张的影响并不显著.最后从合理推进城市化和高等教育扩张两个角度提出四个政策性建议.     

“关系圈”稀释“受害者圈”：企业环境污染与村民大多数沉默的乡村逻辑—山东N村个案研究

基于山东N村手套加工厂及其环境影响的调查发现,村落内生企业的关系嵌入与乡村社会分化的叠加效应,是大多数村民面对环境危害而保持沉默的乡村逻辑。乡村作为兼具乡土底色与经济理性的生活共同体,被企业污染建构为具有统合性的整体受害者圈。“同住一个村”的共同体意识形塑大部分村民的环境沉默行为与少数积极分子环境抗争的自我克制,而企业生产建构的获利者群体进一步分化了受害者圈层,村落“双重圈层”互嵌式关系格局阻隔村民通过集体行动制止企业污染的底层路径。农村内生污染企业的嵌入属性加深了村落社会分化、侵蚀了农村环境治理的社会基础,更提醒关注农村污染企业的社区嵌入与村民环境行为选择的复杂性关联。     

Investigating Possible Effects of Ethnicity and Age on Gambling as an Escape

Previous research has shown that there are a number of risk factors for disordered and problem gambling, including an individual’s ethnicity and age. Endorsing gambling as an escape has also been shown to contribute to and maintain disordered gambling. The present study examined potential interactions between ethnicity and age as they relate to disordered gambling, as well as if ethnicity and age would be predictors of endorsing gambling as an escape. Three hundred fifteen adults from the United States completed measures relating to gambling. Participants were grouped into ethnic categories of Caucasian and non-Caucasian, and age groups of 18–25, 26–35, 36–55, and 56 years old and above. Non-Caucasians reported more gambling problems than Caucasians. A significant interaction was found between ethnicity and age for 36–55 year olds. Overall, participants were more likely to gamble for positive than negative reinforcement. However, only gambling as an escape was a significant predictor of disordered gambling. Implications and limitations are discussed with the thought that these results are informative to practitioners treating disordered gambling.