FAMILY VALUES AND THE REGULATION OF LABOR

To be efficient, flexible labor markets require geographically mobile workers. Otherwise firms can take advantage of workers' immobility and extract rents at their expense. In cultures with strong family ties, moving away from home is costly. Thus, to limit the rents of firms and to avoid moving, individuals with strong family ties rationally choose regulated labor markets, even though regulation generates higher unemployment and lower incomes. Empirically, we find that individuals who inherit stronger family ties are less mobile, have lower wages and higher unemployment, and support more stringent labor market regulations. We find a positive association between labor market rigidities at the beginning of the 21st century and family values prevailing before World War II, and between family structures in the Middle Ages and current desire for labor market regulation. Both results suggest that labor market regulations have deep cultural roots.     

Schengen's Soft Underbelly? Irregular Migration and Human Smuggling across Land and Sea Borders to Italy

La migration illégale à destination de l'Italie ou passant par ce pays est généralement associée dans l'esprit des gens à l'image de centaines, voire de milliers de migrants traversant la Méditerranée entassés dans de vieux rafiots se maintenant tout juste à flot. On considère souvent que les traversées de ce type sont la preuve de l'existence de cartels criminels qui seraient structurés hiérarchiquement, centralisés, extrêmement bien organisés et actifs au niveau mondial. Le seul problème avec de telles idées reçues est qu'elles ne concordent absolument pas avec les faits dont on dispose et n'ont pas grand chose à voir avec la réalité concrète des systèmes de migration illégale. Cette étude passe en revue un certain nombre de dossiers de tribunaux italiens concernant diverses organisations qui opèrent aussi bien au travers des frontières terrestres que maritimes. Elle montre comment de telles organisations opèrent en tenant compte de diverses spécificités locales et contraintes structurelles.     

Falsification or choice among alternatives: The unsolved dilemma of hypothesis testing

Summary The scientific attitude towards statistical method has always pursued two basic objectives: identifying false assumptions and selecting, amongst the likely assertions, those which are most consistent with a given system. The methodological demarcation between rejection of a statistical statement, because it is ?false?, or exclusion, because it is ?least probable?, lies in the fundamental premises of inferential procedures. In the first class we find the methods proposed by Fisher, Neyman and Pearson; in the second one, the Bayesian techniques. Even if different inferential theories may coexist, any particular solution has a limit of validity strictly bouded, to the conventional procedural rules on which it is based. Invited paper at the Conference on ?Statistical Tests: Methodology and Econometric Applications?, held in Bologna, Italy, 27–28 May 1993.     

Quantile estimation in ultra-high frequency financial data: a comparison between parametric and semiparametric approach

In the context of ACD models for ultra-high frequency data different specifications are available to estimate the conditional mean of intertrade durations, while quantiles estimation has been completely neglected by literature, even if to trading extent it can be more informative. The main problem arising with quantiles estimation is the correct specification of durations probability law: the usual assumption of Exponentially distributed residuals, is very robust for the estimation of parameters of the conditional mean, but dramatically fails the distributional fit. In this paper a semiparametric approach is formalized, and compared with the parametric one, deriving from Exponential assumption. Empirical evidence for a stock of Italian financial market strongly supports the former approach.Paola Zuccolotto: The author wishes to thank Prof. A. Mazzali, Dott. G. De Luca, Dott. M. Sandri for valuable comments.     

Health for immigrants and refugees in the 1990s. A comparative study in seven receiving countries

Health policies for immigrants implemented in seven receiving countries (France, United Kingdom, Switzerland, Italy, Sweden, United States, and Canada) have been comparatively reviewed, taking into account the structure of the health system as well as immigration policy. Countries where immigrant communities have access to political representation, and whose health systems are comprehensive in scope and coverage, tend to have adopted specific health policies for immigrants, which, in turn, led to better access to health services and more information for planning and evaluation.