Thinking about difference in student supervision

Abstract

Over the past decade, educators have given greater recognition to the influence of race and culture on practice and policy. Whilst educators are now including specific courses that take account of diversity, scant attention has been paid to how these issues may be addressed in student supervision. This article reports on a qualitative study examining how three experienced supervisors addressed difference in student supervision. Supervisory approaches were compared examining the supervisors' goals, focus, supervisory strategies, theoretical orientation, contribution made to student learning and the limitation of their particular approach. These findings emphasise the complexity of addressing difference in supervision, and suggest that some additional issues to address in supervision.     

司法判断力监督初论

司法监督制度的改革与完善是一个庞大而复杂的理论问题,从司法判断力这一角度进行探讨,分析司法判断力监督的整体理念,提出应强化当事人的诉讼权利,由"权力对权力"的监督转向"权利对权力"的监督;强化上诉程序的监督功能,弱化程序外部的环境压力等制度设计建议。     

Protective supervision: An inquiry into the relationship between child welfare and the court system

Protective Supervision, in most states, is defined in statute as an option in which the child is allowed to remain in the home of high-risk parents under the authority of the court, with supervision provided by the child protection system. Protective Supervision provides states an option to fulfill the federal mandate, as expressed in its guidance on the Child and Family Services Review, to assure that children are safely maintained in their homes whenever possible and appropriate. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of published work on this option. Further, the relationship between child protection and the judicial system, implicit in Protective Supervision, is rarely examined. In response to this dearth of information, an exploratory study was undertaken in Minnesota, funded by the Minnesota Department of Human Services. Data were derived from focus groups in every region of the state, with both child protection and judicial system participants. This study offers insights into the complicated nature of the partnership between two complex systems — child welfare and the court system. Currently, there is wide variation in how Protective Supervision is understood and practiced. However, where there is mutual respect between child welfare and the courts, Protective Supervision offers a useful tool.     

论证券监管法律制度的基本原则

笔者认为,证券法律制度的基本原则可以区分为两个不同层面的原则;一是,调整证券市场平等主体之间证券财产关系的民法属性的证券法基本原则;二是,调整证券市场非平等主体之间监管与被监管关系的经济法属性的证券法基本原则,后者即为本文所论述的证券监管法律制度的基本原则,它具体包括：公开、公正、适应、高效和政府集中统一监管与行业自律监管有机结合以及分业经营与分数不清监管等六项基本原则。     

住房保障体系中的廉租房退出机制

在政府构筑的保障房体系中,廉租房是最基础的层次,但由于廉租房在制度上缺乏有效的退出机制,准入制度的设计也存在缺陷,再加上整个住房保障体系层次间流转不畅,我国各大城市廉租房普遍存在"只进不出"现象。因此。从整体来看,政府需要完善准入制度,构建动态监管的廉租房退出机制,并完善多层次阶梯式的住房保障体系。     

部门预算委托代理问题的分析与解决对策

文章将原本用于研究企业经济行为的委托代理理论引入到政府领域,指出作为纳税人的社会公众与政府之间,本质上是一种委托—代理关系。在部门预算中,该委托代理关系表现为社会公众—(议会)人民代表大会—政府—政府财政部门—政府职能部门的多环节委托授权链条,由于信息不对称、监督弱化、对腐败惩罚程度轻等原因,且在公共领域内存在“激励不足”情况下,解决部门预算委托代理问题的办法主要是依靠建立有效的监督机制。     

公共经济主体的多元化与政府治理结构的改革

20世纪70年代以来,新自由主义和西方公共经济学开始兴起。公共经济主体日益多元化,西方国家的政府治理结构出现了放任市场的转型。私人部门、第三部门、社区、国际组织纷纷成为公共经济的主体,甚至黑社会组织也为资产阶级提供公共产品。而对人民群众和社会主义国家来说,劳动者组织和公有制经济部门才是政府部门之外的最主要的公共经济主体。只要西方国家的政府还是资产阶级的政府,那么,无论其治理结构如何转型,都阻止不了政治经济危机的发生,相比之下,只有社会主义国家才有可能依靠人民群众来实现政府治理结构的改革,使国家的职能只限于几项符合普遍性、全国性目的的职能。其中比较重要的是实现政企分开,将国有资产管理委员会成建制地从各级政府划归同级人大管辖。     

注册会计师独立性问题的思考

注册会计师行业的“诚信”正面临危机 ,如何恢复和树立公正权威的地位 ,审计独立性起着决定性作用。本文就影响审计独立性的因素及加强提高注册会计师独立性采取的手段进行探讨     

隐性采访和隐私权的保护

在大众传媒的新闻报道中,隐性采访被越来越广泛地运用.隐性采访在舆论监督中具有一定的作用,它是显性采访的必要补充,是在特殊情况下进行舆论监督的必要手段.但是隐性采访不得侵犯隐私权,不得逾越一定的界限.     

Supervising Social Workers in Involuntary Contexts: Some Considerations

ABSTRACT

This article outlines areas for reflection for those providing supervision to social workers working in involuntary and semivoluntary contexts. This includes clinical implications, impacts on social work identity, and potential impacts on the supervisory relationship itself. It suggests that there are some areas that could be considered for discussion and exploration that may be different in focus to other types of supervisory practice, encouraging supervisors to consider their own approach in response to the issues raised.

IMPLICATIONS

• Working in involuntary contexts raises specific challenges in relation to power and authority in practice, as well as a range of ethical dilemmas.

• Supervisors might wish to consider the issues raised with a view to exploring with their supervisees how working with involuntary clients changes their framework or approach.