Risk Comparison of Inequality Constrained Estimators in the Heteroscedastic Linear Model

There exist many studies which treat the inequality and/or interval constraints on coefficients in the homoscedastic linear regression model. However, the sampling performance of the inequality constrained estimators in the heteroscedastic linear model has not been examined. This paper considers the inequality constrained estimators in the heteroscedastic linear regression model and derives their risks under a quadratic loss function. Furthermore, using the inequality constrained estimators, we introduce a pre-test estimator which might be employed after the test for homoscedasticity and derive its risk. In addition, the risk performance of these estimators is evaluated numerically.     

On the History of the Correction for Grouping, 1873–1922

The correction for grouping is a sum of two terms, the first depending on the length of the grouping interval, the second being a periodic function of the position. Thiele (1873) studied the second term, but missed the first. Sheppard (1898) studied the first term, but missed the second. Bruns (1906) derived the first term as the aperiodic term of a Fourier series and the second as the sum of the periodic terms. He found the correction to the coefficients of the Gram–Charlier series and proved that the second term is negligible for a grouped normal distribution with at least eight groups. Independently, Fisher (1922) used the same method to derive the correction to the moments. For the normal distribution with a grouping interval less than the standard deviation Fisher proved that the second term is negligible compared with the first and with the standard error of the first four moments. Moreover, he proved that the estimates of the mean and the standard deviation obtained by the method of moments for a grouped sample with Sheppard's corrections have nearly the same variances as the maximum likelihood estimates, thus providing a new and compelling reason for using Sheppard's corrections.     

The “wrong skewness” problem in stochastic frontier models: A new approach

Stochastic frontier models are widely used to measure, e.g., technical efficiencies of firms. The classical stochastic frontier model often suffers from the empirical artefact that the residuals of the production function may have a positive skewness, whereas a negative one is expected under the model, which leads to estimated full efficiencies of all firms. We propose a new approach to the problem by generalizing the distribution used for the inefficiency variable. This generalized stochastic frontier model allows the sample data to have the wrong skewness while estimating well-defined and nondegenerate efficiency measures. We discuss the statistical properties of the model, and we discuss a test for the symmetry of the error term (no inefficiency). We provide a simulation study to show that our model delivers estimators of efficiency with smaller bias than those of the classical model even if the population skewness has the correct sign. Finally, we apply the model to data of the U.S. textile industry for 1958–2005 and show that for a number of years our model suggests technical efficiencies well below the frontier while the classical one estimates no inefficiency in those years.     

A note on calibration weightings for stratified double sampling with equal probability

This study proposes a more efficient calibration estimator for estimating population mean in stratified double sampling using new calibration weights. The variance of the proposed calibration estimator has been derived under large sample approximation. Calibration asymptotic optimum estimator and its approximate variance estimator are derived for the proposed calibration estimator and existing calibration estimators in stratified double sampling. Analytical results showed that the proposed calibration estimator is more efficient than existing members of its class in stratified double sampling. Analysis and evaluation are presented.     

Estimation of population mean in presence of random non response in two-stage cluster sampling

The present investigation addresses the problem of estimating a finite population mean in two-phase cluster sampling in presence of random non response situations. Utilizing information on an auxiliary variable, regression type estimators has been proposed. Effective imputation techniques have been suggested to deal with the random non response situations. The properties of the proposed estimation strategies have been studied for different cases of random non response situations in practical surveys. The superiority of the suggested methodology over the natural sample mean estimator of population mean has been established through empirical studies carried over the data sets of natural population and artificially generated population.     

On quantiles estimation based on different stratified sampling with optimal allocation

This work considers the problem of estimating a quantile function based on different stratified sampling mechanism. First, we develop an estimate for population quantiles based on stratified simple random sampling (SSRS) and extend the discussion for stratified ranked set sampling (SRSS). Furthermore, the asymptotic behavior of the proposed estimators are presented. In addition, we derive an analytical expression for the optimal allocation under both sampling schemes. Simulation studies are designed to examine the performance of the proposed estimators under varying distributional assumptions. The efficiency of the proposed estimates is further illustrated by analyzing a real data set from CHNS.     

Error variance bias in neighbour balance and evenness of distribution designs

Neighbour balance and evenness of distribution designs help to address user concerns in the two‐dimensional layout of agricultural field trials. This is done by minimising the occurrence of pairwise treatment plot neighbours and ensuring that the replications of treatments are spread out across rows and columns of a trial. Such considerations result in a restriction on the normal randomisation process for a row‐column design which can lead to error variance bias. In this paper, uniformity trial data is used to assess the degree of this bias for both resolvable and non‐resolvable designs. Comparisons are made with a similar investigation using Linear Variance spatial designs.     

Some Statistical Properties of Efficiency Robust Tests with Applications to Genetic Association Studies

Although efficiency robust tests are preferred for genetic association studies when the genetic model is unknown, their statistical properties have been studied for different study designs separately under special situations. We study some statistical properties of the maximin efficiency robust test and a maximum‐type robust test (MAX3) under a general setting and obtain unified results. The results can also be applied to testing hypothesis with a constrained two‐dimensional parameter space. The results are applied to genetic association studies using case–parents trio data.     

More efficient L-Estimates

We propose more efficient L-estimates by using pairwise averages of the observations instead of the observations themselves. For instance, we show that minimum variance quantile estimation of the mean parameter in the exponential distribution improves from 65% to 88%. Simulations show similar improvements in frequently used scale and location estimators like the interquartile range, MAD, and trimmed mean.     

Median regression for SUR models with the same explanatory variables in each equation

In this paper we introduce an interesting feature of the generalized least absolute deviations method for seemingly unrelated regression equations (SURE) models. Contrary to the collapse of generalized leasts-quares parameter estimations of SURE models to the ordinary least-squares estimations of the individual equations when the same regressors are common between all equations, the estimations of the proposed methodology are not identical to the least absolute deviations estimations of the individual equations. This is important since contrary to the least-squares methods, one can take advantage of efficiency gain due to cross-equation correlations even if the system includes the same regressors in each equation.