国外大学生就业力提升研究及其启示

解决就业难的关键在于大学生就业力的提高。国际上对提升在校大学生就业力有较为系统的理论指导,在学校就业指导机构的服务,大学课程的设置方面,均融入了对大学生就业力的培养。根据我国大学教育现状,文章从对就业力的研究、学习的出发点、课程的设置、角色的转变四个方面探讨了就业力提升措施。     

学前教育师范生心理资本与就业力的关系：一个有调节的链式中介效应

为探究学前师范生心理资本对就业力的影响,以及专业承诺、学习投入和社会支持在其中的作用,以江苏省3所高校的244名学前教育师范生为研究对象,采用积极心理资本问卷、大学生专业承诺量表、学习投入量表、学前教育专业学生就业力量表以及领悟社会支持量表进行测量。结果发现,心理资本、专业承诺、学习投入、社会支持、就业力两两显著正相关;心理资本显著正向预测就业力,专业承诺和学习投入在心理资本对就业力的影响中起链式中介作用;社会支持能够调节专业承诺和学习投入对就业力的影响,具体来说,在低社会支持条件下,个体专业承诺对就业力的影响较强,而在高社会支持条件下,个体学习投入对就业力的影响较强。     

One size fits all? The social construction of dis-employ-abled women

This article is based on an evaluation of a labour-market training programme for women with ‘mental health problems’ in a social workplace in Belgium. The research team explored the retrospective insider perspectives on the work aspirations of the women involved in the programme to identify critical dynamics in their high drop-out from the social workplace. The central findings provide evidence of a prevalent one-size-fits-all discourse in these practices wherein complex and interrelated processes of discrimination take place that are based on both disability and gender. The findings demonstrate that the social workplace functions as a male bastion, in which the oversized overalls that women are forced to wear are symbolically relevant. In conclusion, we discuss and challenge the dominance of the neo-liberal norm of economic productivity and employability.     

就业能力研究:回顾与展望

通过对就业能力问题产生的社会经济背景因素以及就业能力的不同释义的探讨能够发现,就业能力体现在个人层面上是个人职业成功的关键;体现在组织层面上是组织保持弹性和活力的关键;体现在政府层面上是社会经济可持续发展的关键。从高等教育的角度讲,拥有就业能力才能使毕业生获得持久的就业和职业生涯保障。     

职业生涯规划教育对提升大学生就业能力的调研

以某校大学生为调查对象,采用问卷调查和随即访谈相结合的方法,对其职业生涯规划现状做了深入的调查分析,结果发现多数学生由于对专业不了解,导致了学习及生活没有目标,就业压力大,同时缺乏对职业生涯规划理论知识的掌握,需要帮助及指导;但学校相关的教学及指导机构力量较薄弱,导致对学生的教育及引导不足.根据以上调查结果及问题提出了树立职业生涯规划教育理念、优化职业生涯规划课堂类型、加强职业生涯规划指导机构及设施建设、实行导师制,提供个性化咨询等建议.     

《庄子》一价形容词简单谓语句的句型及其结构模式

《庄子》一价形容词简单谓语句的基本句型共有四种：（1）s＋PAnl（共310句）（2）S＋Adv＋PAnl（共227句）（3）S＋PAnl＋C（26句）（4）s＋PAnl＋O（2句）。句型（1）有6种不同的结构模式,句型（2）作状语的主要是副词、带词尾的状态形容词、介宾短语等,句型（3）中作补语的主要是介宾短语,句型（4）宾语是形容词的配价补足语。     

高校就业指导理念与就业能力培养体系构建

近年来,大学生结构性失业问题日益突出,这一现象引起社会各界的广泛关注。而没有树立好与自身相适应的就业指导理念和构建好大学生就业能力培养体系是主要原因。因此,高校要树立正确的大学生就业指导理念,以适应时代要求的大学生就业能力培养与提升诉求。高校就业指导理念与大学生就业能力培养息息相关。高校要树立大学生就业是高校生命线的理念、有限就业市场导向的理念、全程化就业指导培养理念,进而构建符合高校自身的大学生就业能力培养教育、实践和保障体系,切实提高大学生就业能力。     

基于心理健康教育课程提升大学生就业力的思考

如何提升大学生的就业力以应对日益严峻的就业形势成为高校面临的一个重大课题。心理健康教育课程因其教学目标与内容与大学生就业力密切相关,对于提升大学生就业力有着重要的作用,因此,心理健康教育课程应该将提升大学生就业力确定为教学目标,在教学内容上更重视大学生职业生涯规划教育,在教学方法上采用更多样化的教学手段以促进大学生就业力的全面提升。     

大学毕业生就业能力:现状、原因与对策——基于福州市部分高校大学毕业生的调查

大学生就业难的原因是多方面的,而大学生就业能力的高低是影响其能否顺利就业的一个主要因素。在对就业能力及其构成的文献回顾的基础上,提出了大学生就业能力的构成维度,并对福州市高校大学毕业生就业能力进行了调查和分析,最后提出了提高大学毕业生就业能力的相关对策建议。     

Criteria for evaluating qualitative studies

Many countries are becoming increasingly reliant upon an aging workforce. Yet, much literature positions older workers as ‘last resort’ employees, held in low esteem by employers whose preference for youth extends into decision-making about workplace engagement and support. As part of a broader study on maintaining the competence of older workers, we investigated the extent to which a group of employees in Australia aged 45 or more perceived they were discriminated against because of their age, including access to training, promotion opportunities and job security. Against expectations arising from the literature, informants reported little in the way of explicit age-related bias in their employment, opportunities for advancement and further development. Although the informants have particular characteristics and featured paraprofessional and professional workers, the contrast is noteworthy between what is reported in the literature and often premised on surveys, and our data were based on interviews. The findings indicate a need to be wary of making easy generalizations about the extent to which older workers per se are discriminated against in the workplace, while at the same time acknowledging that such discrimination exists, and perhaps for particular kinds of workers. In addition, we found a range of nuanced responses that suggest there are tensions between discriminations policies and practice that are a challenge for human resource development professionals.