论政府的经济职能

政府的经济职能随经济社会发展而变化,不同时期不同经济体制下政府的经济职能不同,本文论述了政府经济职能的演变过程,分析了市场经济发达国家与我国政府经济职能的差异性,最后从理论上阐明了当前我国政府在经济发展、环境保护中应发挥的经济职能。     

二元方程式F(x,y)=0确定的函数曲线渐近线的探讨

给出二元方程式F(x,y)=0确定的函数曲线渐近线的几个结果。     

试论英语教学中教师的主导作用

本文从道德教育、文化传播、知识传授和能力培养等四个方面论述了在英语教学中教师的主导作用,阐述了英语教学中教师主导作用的重要性。     

商业银行非财务信用风险分析

传统的信用风险评估方法仅仅从贷款企业角度来评价商业银行所面临的信用风险,而且评价企业信用风险时,也集中在贷款企业的财务风险评价上,忽略了银行本身存、贷款结构和风险状况对信用风险的影响,造成了评估主体缺位。作为对众多文献的补充,从贷款企业非财务风险因素、银行风险因素和宏观经济环境风险因素三个方面进行了信用风险因素分析,完善了商业银行信用风险评估指标体系。     

论政府在社会主义市场经济中的职能定位问题

政府在社会主义市场经济中如何定位一直是理论界争论的焦点之一。通过对市场与政府的关系分析,指出在中国市场和政府结合的最佳途径是以市场为基础,将政府职能转化为以建设公共服务型为重点。     

Low dose risk estimation via simultaneous statistical inferences

Summary.  The paper develops and studies simultaneous confidence bounds that are useful for making low dose inferences in quantitative risk analysis. Application is intended for risk assessment studies where human, animal or ecological data are used to set safe low dose levels of a toxic agent, but where study information is limited to high dose levels of the agent. Methods are derived for estimating simultaneous, one-sided, upper confidence limits on risk for end points measured on a continuous scale. From the simultaneous confidence bounds, lower confidence limits on the dose that is associated with a particular risk (often referred to as a bench-mark dose ) are calculated. An important feature of the simultaneous construction is that any inferences that are based on inverting the simultaneous confidence bounds apply automatically to inverse bounds on the bench-mark dose.     

买卖合同中的风险转移制度研究

在买卖合同中,风险应被限定为标的物因法定免责事由毁损、灭失的不利状态.由于各种风险的存在,风险转移制度显得尤为重要,它直接关系到当事人最根本的利益,因此是买卖合同中最重要的问题.各国对风险转移制度的规定是不同的,主要有合同订立主义、所有人主义及交付主义三种形式.我国买卖合同的风险转移制度采纳交付主义为一般原则,兼采特别法原则.     

学生桌椅设计中的要素

随着生活水平的不断提高,人们对产品的需求从对物理功能的需求上升到对生理功能、心理功能的需求.如何满足不同身高、体形的学生对课桌椅的要求,如何提高课桌椅的舒适性、实用性、美观性,是学生桌椅设计中需关注的问题.     

功能及其障碍--对我国大学园区建设的反思

大学园区是对传统办学模式的继承和超越.作为一种新事物,大学园区已经显现出其优势所在,同时也暴露出不少的问题.探究大学园区的功能及其障碍,总结几年来我国大学园区建设的经验,反思在建设中存在的问题,对大学园区的持续健康发展是十分必要的.     

Statistics for weighing benefits and harms in a proposed genetic substudy of a randomized cancer prevention trial

Summary.  When evaluating potential interventions for cancer prevention, it is necessary to compare benefits and harms. With new study designs, new statistical approaches may be needed to facilitate this comparison. A case in point arose in a proposed genetic substudy of a randomized trial of tamoxifen versus placebo in asymptomatic women who were at high risk for breast cancer. Although the randomized trial showed that tamoxifen substantially reduced the risk of breast cancer, the harms from tamoxifen were serious and some were life threaten-ing. In hopes of finding a subset of women with inherited risk genes who derive greater bene-fits from tamoxifen, we proposed a nested case–control study to test some trial subjects for various genes and new statistical methods to extrapolate benefits and harms to the general population. An important design question is whether or not the study should target common low penetrance genes. Our calculations show that useful results are only likely with rare high penetrance genes.