民族高校教材管理问题研究

民族高校的教材工作有着与其它高校所不同的一些特点,教材管理工作是民族高校教学管理的一项基础性工作,它对提高学校的教育质量和教学水平具有极其重要的意义.本文对民族高校教材管理工作存在的问题进行了分析,并提出了解决办法.     

用经济指标规范工程项目管理的探讨

目前工程项目管理存在的问题是项目预期性差,工程质量与经济效益难以协调,其根本的原因是运用经济手段管理项目的力度不够,造成工程的高投入与低产出;在管理方式上,行政命令过多,而经济杆杠发挥的作用不多。为了解决这些问题,必须运用经济的指标去管理与控制项目的运行。     

清末修律的评价及其对依法治国的启示

清末修律是中国法制史上的重大历史事件,清末修律对依法治国、建设社会主义法治国家的重要启示在于:依法治国必须与更新传统法律观念和树立现代法治意识结合起来;依法治国必须结合中国国情,正确把握学习和继受西方法律;依法治国必须吸取中华传统法律文化和优良传统道德的精华,实事求是地推进法治建设。     

广义岭选择指数(英文)

把岭回归的原理和方法应用到家畜性状的选择指数中 ,提出了广义岭选择指数 ,理论和实践证明的这一指数形式在一定意义上优于传统的选择指数。也可以说 ,它在一定意义上丰富了选择指数的理论 ,但不能代替经典的选择指数     

中德婚姻市场供需情况的比较研究

本文从概念、形成机制、度量方法、后果及其解决途径等方面探讨了婚姻挤压问题 ,考虑到婚姻挤压对婚姻寿命、初婚人数及其性别差异的影响而创立了婚姻寿命指数与初婚挤压指数两指标 ,提出了婚姻市场类型的划分标准。通过对中德两国婚姻市场的历史与现状的考察 ,揭示了中德两国婚姻挤压产生的原因、类型、差异和未来的变化趋势 ,并对如何化解中国未来婚姻市场的供求矛盾提出了对策与建议     

流动人口计划生育工作指标体系与考核评估方式初探

流动人口计划生育工作是我国计划生育工作的两大难点之一。要提高流动人口计划生育管理水平,必须建立科学的指标体系来规范流动人口计生管理。本文结合实践,论述流动人口计生管理工作指标体系设置原则,统计口径,以及管理质量考核评估方法和内容。     

试论高师本科教学工作合格评估指标的合理性

本文通过对1996年原国家教委《高等师范学校本科教学工作评估方案（试行）》和1999年教育部《高等师范学校本科教学工作合格评估方案（试行》的比较研究,充分肯定了新评估方案的科学性和合理性,并结合评估操作实际,提出了评估方案中一些值得深入探讨的问题。     

Developing a Rubric for Supervision of Students Counseling LGBTQ Clients

More than 100 pieces of anti-lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) legislation are active in 2018. In this current political climate of “conscience clause” legislation, counselor educators and supervisors are poised to adopt more holistic practices in assessing and evaluating student and supervisee readiness to work with LGBT queer (Q) clients. The purpose of this article is to present a dispositional framework for assessment and evaluation and introduce the flexibility, integrity, awareness, stability, compassion, and openness (FIASCO) rubric of professional counseling dispositions. Two court cases, Keeton v. Anderson-Wiley and Ward v. Wilbanks, are used as case examples for applying the FIASCO rubric to situations involving LGBTQ clients.     

Using theory of change as a framework for examining community context and philanthropic impact

As part of the process of examining their theory of change (TOC) and reflecting on grant making activity, one Midwestern foundation employed a multipronged strategy to assess 209 community-based mental health grants across seven years of funding. This article details the evaluation approach, which comprised these areas of the TOC: grantees’ use of evidence-based interventions, cultural competency, quality improvement, community collaboration, and use of integrated care. Inductive analyses identified grantees’ use of innovative practices, trauma-informed care, and use of validated instruments. In an iterative exercise spanning multiple years, the foundation and researchers found ways to gather information about community capacity and impact while simultaneously minimizing grantee data collection/reporting burden. Findings revealed that community agencies were improving in their uptake of evidence-based interventions and use of validated instruments. Community grantee use of trauma informed care also improved over the study period. Grantee desire to collaborate and coordinate services within the community was also strong. The research also revealed that in multiple domains (such as technology and non-profit operating costs) grantees needed support in building agency capacity. These findings shed light on which aspects of the foundation’s TOC were being addressed through funding, and which areas of the community needed additional support.     

Using a community-created multisite evaluation to promote evaluation use across a sector

Multisite evaluation has been cited as a strategy for building knowledge about a program's success and enhancing evaluation capacity and evaluation use. Even so, the extent to which data from these efforts are made available to individual project participants varies. This article describes a community-created multisite evaluation that was designed to overcome this limitation. Based on the negotiated centralized evaluation model and implemented within the context of a community of practice, the EvalFest community-created multisite evaluation has used shared measures to collect data from 30,000 participants from partner sites across the community over three years. This article describes the design characteristics of the community-created multisite approach, and presents results related to partners’ evaluation use that demonstrate the early success of this method. We conclude by considering how this strategy might be applied to other sectors.