日本“匠人精神”面面观

中国游客的“爆买”让日本百货商场的生意格外火爆,在感叹中国人惊人购买力的同时,“爆买”也引发对中国制造的集体反思. 众所周知,支撑日本制造的即是匠人精神.与日本制造坚定信仰匠人精神不同,中国制造业普遍缺乏这种沉下心来钻研本业的态度,而是抱着浮躁的心态寻求速成的捷径,比如盛行的互联网思维.不少中国企业家将互联网思维视为救命稻草,而把像匠人一样追求产品品质的精神抛在脑后.     

“互联网+”时代的电子化人力资源管理路径浅析

随着我国信息技术的不断发展,2016年,“互联网十”作为最炙手可热的词汇,云计算、互联网、大数据等许多新兴技术飞速发展起来.互联网等应用已经渗透到各行各业之中,并在其中取得了不错的效果.当今时代,对于人力资源的管理提出了更高的要求,这就使得人力资源管理者不得不加快自己转型的步伐.基于此,首先对“互联网+”时代下人力资源管理的模式进行分析,然后提出与之相关的电子化人力资源管理路径.     

互联网时代如何提高高校行政秘书的综合素质

随着互联网的普及发展,高校培养行政秘书必须符合改革与发展的时代需求.基于此,首先简要介绍高校行政秘书的具体工作内容,然后研究其培养方式,以期为其更好地发展做出贡献.     

互联网+模式下川酒的品牌推广

互联网时代的到来,在很大程度上促进了川酒品牌推广,扩大其影响力,在根本上保证了整个行业的进步和发展,加速整个产业链的成熟。要善于借助于互联网手段来进行川酒产品价格、产品类型、消费群体、销售渠道等几个方面的探索,从而找到川酒品牌建设中存在的问题,并为之提供有效的解决思路。本文将重点来对目前互联网+模式下川酒的品牌推广进行有效分析,通过打造川酒企业网络互动平台、借助于多种渠道来实现川酒品牌推广、提升川酒品牌的高附加值等,以此来从根本上实现川酒品牌的推广。     

鲍德温•斯宾塞与后维多利亚时代的古典人类学

The post-Victorian anthropologist Baldwin Spencer was the first to investigate the central and northern aboriginal tribes of Australia. His ethnographic works in this area have greatly in-fluenced related disciplines and studies in fields such as kinship, totem worship, and primitive reli-gions. In the field of classics and anthropology, Spencer’s academic heritage has received wide-spread respect and recognition, and has made sub-sequent academic discussion possible. In order to present Spencer’s personal experiences and aca-demic ideas clearly and comprehensively, it is nec-essary to return to the post-Victorian context, and comb Spencer’ s life history and academic history. Taking important clues from various times an e-vents in his life, the paper introduces three peri-ods:Spencer’s early training in the discipline and his epistemic background, his medium-term eth-nographic investigations and works, and the later investigations of Tierra del Fuego. Textual study, based on Spencer’s life history and academic histo-ry, is very useful to understand his ethnographic investigations. Sir Walter Baldwin Spencer ( 1860 -1929 ) was born on 23 June, 1860 in Lancashire, Eng-land. Spencer was educated at Old Trafford School and at the Manchester School of Art. His interest in art and sketching was lifelong, and would reveal itself in his competence as a scientific draftsman and illustrator ( D. J. Mulvaney,1990 ) . Entering Owens College ( Victoria University of Manchester) in 1879, Spencer intended to study medicine. In-spired by Milnes Marshall, a disciple of Darwin disciple, he became a committed evolutionary biol-ogist, soon abandoning conventional religion. He entered the University of Oxford in 1881 to study
science under Professor H. N. Moseley, who com-bined an enthusiasm for evolutionary biology with ethnological interests. Spencer grasped Oxford ’ s diverse opportunities, which included lectures by Ruskin and E. B. Tylor. In 1887, Spencer ar-rived at Melbourne University . With his colleague Professor David Masson, Spencer helped to trans-form university standards and they co-operated as entrepreneurs of Australian science. Spencer was recruited as zoologist and photog-rapher in the 1894 Horn scientific exploration ex-pedition to central Australia. His anthropological interest was rekindled when he met F. J. Gillen, the Alice Springs postmaster, during the expedi-tion. In 1896 Spencer joined Gillen for the most intensive fieldwork then attempted in Australia. The Native Tribes of Central Australia ( 1899 ) , which resulted, was to influence contemporary theories on social evolution and interpretations of the origins of art and ceremonial practices. Spencer and Gillen drove a buggy from Oodnadatta to Borroloola in 1901-02 . Their research resulted in The Northern Tribes of Central Australia ( 1904 );Haddon had written that the names of Spencer and Gillen are familiar to every ethnologist in the world, and probably no books on ethnology have been so wide-ly noticed and criticized as have The Native Tribes of Central Australia and The Northern Tribes of Central Australia (A. C. Haddon ,1902). To assist the Government of the Common-wealth, Spencer was appointed Special Commis-sioner for Aboriginals in the Northern Territory, and also their Chief Protector. He also led three other scientists, including J. A. Gilruth, on the 1911 Preliminary Scientific Expedition. Native Tribes of the Northern Territory of Australia (1914)
described his ethnographic observations and the ex-tensive collections made on the expedition. At the government ’ s request, Spencer visited Alice Springs and Hermannsburg in 1923 . He published The Arunta: A Study of a Stone Age People ( 2 vols, 1927 ) to respond to the criticisms derived from Carl Stretlow and defend his work. A popular rewrite of previous books followed—Wanderings in Wild Australia ( 2 vols, 1928 )—this time under his sole authorship. Spencer retired as emeritus professor in 1919 . His nerves and his judgments were impaired from the strain of continuous overwork, the virtual disin-tegration of his marriage, and he was finally hospi-talized in 1921 . His health improved and within two years he resumed anthropological activities and rebuilt his art collection. He sailed to Tierra del Fuego together with Jean Hamilton to undertake anthropological studies early in 1929. Spencer, with an unrivalled record of anthropological field-work in Australia, undertook this journey to fill a gap in our knowledge, and compare very different and remote races of mankind (A. C. H. ,1931). However, his gallant attempt was prematurely frus-trated by his death from angina pectoris, at which point he had been only two months in the field. His notes were organized and published as Spencer’s Last Journey (1931). His achievements were recognized. Elected as a fellow of the Royal Society in 1900 , he was ap-pointed C. M. G. in 1904 and K. C. M. G. in 1916 . Manchester University conferred him with an honorary doctorate of science, while Melbourne a-warded him a doctorate of letters. Exeter College, Oxford, elected him to an honorary fellowship in 1907 , and stained glass in its hall commemorates his contribution. James Frazer’s letter to Spencer in 1899 was prophetic: books like mine, merely speculative, will be superseded sooner or later ( the sooner the better for the sake of truth) by bet-ter induction based on fuller knowledge;books like yours, containing records of observations, will nev-er be superseded ( John M. Cooper, 1932 ) . Therefore, the sense and value of reading and un-derstanding Spencer and his books today goes with-out saying.     

新媒体时代大学生就业指导课程教学优化路径分析

在新媒体时代下,网络化和信息化迅速发展,大学生能够通过新媒体工具获取大量的信息,获取信息的渠道和方式也多种多样,对大学生的思想带来了很大影响,使得大学生形成了多样化和多元化的思想方式,从而给大学生就业指导课程教学带来了极大的机遇和挑战.基于此,对新媒体的特点和影响进行了深入分析,在教学优化能够充分利用新媒体积极面的基础上,提出新媒体环境下就业指导课程教学改革的实现路径,从而利用新媒体不断延伸就业指导工作平台,使得学生能够最快速地获取准确的就业信息,最终为学生提供最有效的就业指导.     

基于马克思主义哲学原理的网络舆情引导分析

互联网为广大民众提供了获取信息、交流观点甚至是情绪宣泄的重要平台。与传统媒体相比,互联网信息传播在深度、广度和速度等方面都极具优势,在传统传播渠道中易于控制的民意事件,在互联网的助推下若引导不当容易转化为群体性突发事件。国家转型期出现的各类社会矛盾能够通过网络渠道迅速聚集、扩散,给政府等公共管理部门带来了巨大压力与挑战。     

“互联网+资本”背景下面向东南亚的视听产业融合发展探析

“一带一路”战略给面向东南亚的视听产业融合发展创造了良好条件。“互联网+资本”背景下促进面向东南亚的视听产业融合发展,需要健全面向东南亚的投融资及相应的保障机制,充分发挥资本的杠杆作用,继续加强中国与东南亚各国的文化交流,针对不同国家、地区的经济政治环境制订个性化的融合发展规划,并从经济结构调整的高度思考面向东南亚的视听产业融合发展路径。     

论屈原的独醒精神及其时代意义

屈原特别崇高的"独醒精神",是非常宝贵的精神遗产。其时代意义在于:有利于当代知识分子"思想之自由、精神之独立"的使命回归;"文格"与"人格"相统一的人格重塑;正气与骨气的形象再造。     

二元选择论——唯物史观的一座发展平台

当今世界和当代中国正处于大变革大发展时期,出现了诸多前所未有的新情况、新问题,呼唤能作出系统化理论化解读,哲学社会科学面临巨大挑战,也带来了大发展的机遇.仅靠已有原理不足以应对时代的挑战,应是在基本原理上有所突破创新.马克思主义基本原理集中体现于唯物史观.20世纪的100年,马克思主义的创新发展,多体现在科学社会主义上,唯物史观没有明显的进展.近十年来,学界呼唤发展唯物史观,并提出若干思路、若干新论点,但总的说来成效不显著,原因在于缺乏一座发展平台.为今之计,是要从原始创新打开突破口,建立起一个新论说,作为唯物史观的发展平台,推动唯物史观有个大突破大发展,以应对时代大变迁.这个新论说,就是文章提出的二元选择论.