用民族文化提升传统旅游风景名胜地的吸引力——以《印象·刘三姐》为例

<印象·刘三姐>立足广西桂林本地的自然资源和人文资源,用民族文化提升桂林山水的吸引力,是站在漓江和广西民族文化的根基上诞生的新的旅游风景.<印象·刘三姐>的成功,充分说明自然旅游资源和民族文化的关系相辅相成--自然旅游资源需要加入民族文化的成分提升其旅游价值,民族文化需要借助自然旅游资源的平台充分展示和弘扬.在旅游开发中,民族文化需要现代化的包装,需要现代的手段展示和体现.     

为文不惟怜风月 一枝一叶总关情——浅谈恰白·次旦平措与新时期初的西藏文学

恰白·次旦平措先生的文学创作,始终浸透着对现实的强烈关怀和热情赞颂以及对历史本身的深入感悟,是现实主义精神的体现,也是历史沉思的诗性表达,在内容上,其作品突破宗教拘囿、古典规限,涌动着个人的真实体验与现代气息,予以人积极、乐观,宏大、壮丽的审美观感.其作品既是其对历史发展、社会实践的自觉意识的反映,也是其人文主义、朴素唯物主义思想的审美表现.     

是"圣王"还是"内外"?——从《庄子·天下》看"内圣外王"的原始意蕴

本文用"以庄解庄"的方式,回到<庄子·天下>篇原文来解析"内圣外王"的原始意涵,认为:从前后文的具体语境和内容来看,在<庄子·天下>篇中,"内圣外王"谈的主要是"内"与"外"的问题,而不是平常所理解的"圣"与"王"的问题.     

鲍德温•斯宾塞与后维多利亚时代的古典人类学

The post-Victorian anthropologist Baldwin Spencer was the first to investigate the central and northern aboriginal tribes of Australia. His ethnographic works in this area have greatly in-fluenced related disciplines and studies in fields such as kinship, totem worship, and primitive reli-gions. In the field of classics and anthropology, Spencer’s academic heritage has received wide-spread respect and recognition, and has made sub-sequent academic discussion possible. In order to present Spencer’s personal experiences and aca-demic ideas clearly and comprehensively, it is nec-essary to return to the post-Victorian context, and comb Spencer’ s life history and academic history. Taking important clues from various times an e-vents in his life, the paper introduces three peri-ods:Spencer’s early training in the discipline and his epistemic background, his medium-term eth-nographic investigations and works, and the later investigations of Tierra del Fuego. Textual study, based on Spencer’s life history and academic histo-ry, is very useful to understand his ethnographic investigations. Sir Walter Baldwin Spencer ( 1860 -1929 ) was born on 23 June, 1860 in Lancashire, Eng-land. Spencer was educated at Old Trafford School and at the Manchester School of Art. His interest in art and sketching was lifelong, and would reveal itself in his competence as a scientific draftsman and illustrator ( D. J. Mulvaney,1990 ) . Entering Owens College ( Victoria University of Manchester) in 1879, Spencer intended to study medicine. In-spired by Milnes Marshall, a disciple of Darwin disciple, he became a committed evolutionary biol-ogist, soon abandoning conventional religion. He entered the University of Oxford in 1881 to study
science under Professor H. N. Moseley, who com-bined an enthusiasm for evolutionary biology with ethnological interests. Spencer grasped Oxford ’ s diverse opportunities, which included lectures by Ruskin and E. B. Tylor. In 1887, Spencer ar-rived at Melbourne University . With his colleague Professor David Masson, Spencer helped to trans-form university standards and they co-operated as entrepreneurs of Australian science. Spencer was recruited as zoologist and photog-rapher in the 1894 Horn scientific exploration ex-pedition to central Australia. His anthropological interest was rekindled when he met F. J. Gillen, the Alice Springs postmaster, during the expedi-tion. In 1896 Spencer joined Gillen for the most intensive fieldwork then attempted in Australia. The Native Tribes of Central Australia ( 1899 ) , which resulted, was to influence contemporary theories on social evolution and interpretations of the origins of art and ceremonial practices. Spencer and Gillen drove a buggy from Oodnadatta to Borroloola in 1901-02 . Their research resulted in The Northern Tribes of Central Australia ( 1904 );Haddon had written that the names of Spencer and Gillen are familiar to every ethnologist in the world, and probably no books on ethnology have been so wide-ly noticed and criticized as have The Native Tribes of Central Australia and The Northern Tribes of Central Australia (A. C. Haddon ,1902). To assist the Government of the Common-wealth, Spencer was appointed Special Commis-sioner for Aboriginals in the Northern Territory, and also their Chief Protector. He also led three other scientists, including J. A. Gilruth, on the 1911 Preliminary Scientific Expedition. Native Tribes of the Northern Territory of Australia (1914)
described his ethnographic observations and the ex-tensive collections made on the expedition. At the government ’ s request, Spencer visited Alice Springs and Hermannsburg in 1923 . He published The Arunta: A Study of a Stone Age People ( 2 vols, 1927 ) to respond to the criticisms derived from Carl Stretlow and defend his work. A popular rewrite of previous books followed—Wanderings in Wild Australia ( 2 vols, 1928 )—this time under his sole authorship. Spencer retired as emeritus professor in 1919 . His nerves and his judgments were impaired from the strain of continuous overwork, the virtual disin-tegration of his marriage, and he was finally hospi-talized in 1921 . His health improved and within two years he resumed anthropological activities and rebuilt his art collection. He sailed to Tierra del Fuego together with Jean Hamilton to undertake anthropological studies early in 1929. Spencer, with an unrivalled record of anthropological field-work in Australia, undertook this journey to fill a gap in our knowledge, and compare very different and remote races of mankind (A. C. H. ,1931). However, his gallant attempt was prematurely frus-trated by his death from angina pectoris, at which point he had been only two months in the field. His notes were organized and published as Spencer’s Last Journey (1931). His achievements were recognized. Elected as a fellow of the Royal Society in 1900 , he was ap-pointed C. M. G. in 1904 and K. C. M. G. in 1916 . Manchester University conferred him with an honorary doctorate of science, while Melbourne a-warded him a doctorate of letters. Exeter College, Oxford, elected him to an honorary fellowship in 1907 , and stained glass in its hall commemorates his contribution. James Frazer’s letter to Spencer in 1899 was prophetic: books like mine, merely speculative, will be superseded sooner or later ( the sooner the better for the sake of truth) by bet-ter induction based on fuller knowledge;books like yours, containing records of observations, will nev-er be superseded ( John M. Cooper, 1932 ) . Therefore, the sense and value of reading and un-derstanding Spencer and his books today goes with-out saying.     

谱系研究：总体历史链条断裂中显露的历史事件突现--福柯的《尼采·谱系学·历史学》解读

找到没有本质的事物,也就是找到历史中的他者———这是一种将传统生物树式谱系链斩断后生成的新的谱系真相,尼采就是在这个全新的倒置构境层中透视传统道德和重估一切文化价值的。正是在这个传统谱系倒序的构境意义域中,福柯深入地发展了尼采这种新的倒置的谱系观念。他提出,谱系研究就是要重新面对那些被总体性历史棱镜剔除的黑暗中的独特事物和现象,让它们重现,即不再是某个重大历史目的和伟大进步目标的“阶段性”事件和“不成熟”的雏形,它们只是无本质的自己,即非目的论中的历史他者,这也就是反对起源的谱系研究的真正历史对象。     

安东尼·特罗洛普的同情观与叙事艺术——以《巴彻斯特养老院》为例

安东尼·特罗洛普继承了英国文学中的道德传统,他的叙事技巧也受到了较多研究,但尚缺乏结合两者关系进行的全景式研究。在《巴彻斯特养老院》中,小说的叙事艺术与道德倾向形成微妙互关系,文体层面叙事的"介入"对故事层面权力的"介入"构成了反讽,前者塑造了读者的身份自足从而激发真正的同情,后者侵犯了个人自由、漠视个人需求最终导致对人同情的失落,作者正是通过关于"介入"的两种相反的叙事艺术,完成了对其道德倾向的刻画,展现出独特的同情观,同时表达了对维多利亚时代教会、媒体权力泛滥的深度反思及对个人为保全"消极自由"所作努力的肯定。     

“丘未达,不敢尝”另解

《论语·乡党》中"丘未达,不敢尝",一般注释为"孔子我不知(药性),(所以)不敢吃",本文从现代白话译文语句的前后不关联、"达"的释义、"未"与"X(不、岂)敢"的含义、类似馈赠事件对比等方面进行研究,认为可解释为"丘未曾显达,不(岂)敢吃(接受)"。     

基于传播学视角的意识形态建设

在2013年“8·19讲话”中,习近平同志强调,最上乘的宣传是“看不见的宣传”.从传播学的视角对这种“看不见的宣传”进行深入研究和剖析,对我们掌握意识形态领域主导权,加强话语引导力有重要意义.本文从概念的出发点、传播导向、受众意识、话语表达形式、特点特征、发展趋势等6个方面入手,提出了坚持党性人民性统一、突出个体意识、注重形象表达、隐性显性兼具、融通中国内容和国际视野等意识形态建构的现实路径.     

盖尔达维的中间主义思想研究

作为当代阿拉伯-伊斯兰世界的主流思潮之一,伊斯兰“中间主义”认为,伊斯兰文明的首要信息是中正与和平,伊斯兰教反对各种形式的极端主义和恐怖主义,不同文明间应开展平等对话与交流,不同民族和国家间的友好交往是人类共同发展和世界持久和平的基础。卡塔尔大学教授尤苏夫·盖尔达维是这一思潮的重要代表人物之一,本文对其主要思想作了简要介绍,并指出他的中正、中和思想对于维护阿拉伯民族的团结、促进各国人民相互理解和世界和平事业,具有重要的现实意义。     

不同时代大事件中大学生爱国行为比较

本文选择1919年五·四运动与2008年三大事件为时间切入点,研究发现五·四时期的大学生爱国行为具有政治性、组织性、宣传动员性、扩散性和妥协性五大特点;而新世纪的新一代大学生在大事件发生时的爱国行为具有主要体现出多元化和理性化的趋势,而五四运动中的五大特点在今日都有不同程度的减弱。这一变化之发生,主要原因在于信息和教育的普及化、大学生群体同质性的下降、时代赋予大学生的使命的变化。文章认为,在竞争愈益激烈的当今社会中,大学生在爱国方面的激情依然没有减退,只是在以不同于以往的形式加以表达。对此要有客观的了解,在此基础上再加以适当引导,以促进大学生群体更好地为构建和谐社会添砖加瓦。