园区经济理论述评

园区经济现象引起了世界各国的广泛关注,但对园区经济理论的研究却始于20世纪80年代,且主要集中在对科学园、工业园、技术城、开发区等典型园区经济发展经验的概括、总结以及对策性研究,而把园区经济作为一个整体从理论上进行系统研究尚处于起步阶段。对国内外园区经济的一些基本论述作了简要综述,并在此基础上提出了一些重要论点。     

论司法审查制度之困境与出路

就现代法治的基本精神而言,以权力制约和权利救济为主旨的司法审查机制具有明显的价值合理性,但是,在制度实践方面,现行司法审查机制的展开却遭遇重重困境,表现为司法设置之体制依附性、司法审查范围之局限性以及审查标准之单一化。重整与完善我国司法审查制度之根本出路在于:深化司法体制改革,彰显和强化司法独立;拓宽司法审查的对象范围,变审查法定原则为审查假定原则;实现司法审查标准的多元化,推行司法最终裁决原则。     

多维视角下共享经济理论研究综述:理论演进与研究主题

伴随着商业实践的蓬勃发展,共享经济已成为新的理论研究热点,本文对共享经济的理论演进脉络、研究主题进行了系统梳理。从时间维度上,将共享经济理论演进分为三个阶段:理论萌芽阶段、理论觉醒阶段和理论自觉阶段。另外,从经济学、管理学、社会学、法学等多维视角对共享经济进行解构,并从共享经济的消费者及资源提供者、平台、传统企业、政府、社会与环境等视角,总结当前共享经济研究主题,并对未来研究进行了展望。     

A systematic review on the application of dialogue in public relations to information communication technology-based platforms: Comparing English and Chinese contexts

This study aims to systematically analyze and compare studies applying the dialogue approach in public relations to information communication technologies (ICTs) under English and Chinese context. Specifically, we want to investigate the subjects, the adoption of dialogic principles, and the processing of additional valuables of dialogue in selected studies. By identifying 68 relevant peer-reviewed journal articles under English context and 13 under Chinese context, we analyzed different subjects in selected publications, including their research topics, methods, samples and objectives. Moreover, our study also revealed the following results: (1) three dialogic principles were well adopted while the other two were not; (2) public engagement was the most common effect; (3) organizational response was the most common antecedent to dialogue implementation. Future studies are recommended to diversify research methods, topics and relevant technologies. We also call for developing theoretical models for dialogue in public relations and updating dialogic principles and measurements. Based upon the fact that the dialogue approach is less studied under Chinese context, we also offer a path to construct effective and ethical communication between organizations and publics on various ICT-based platforms in Greater China.     

A scoping review of knowledge syntheses in the field of evaluation across four decades of practice

This scoping review of 62 knowledge syntheses published in evaluation-focused journals between 1979 and May 2018 provides a portrait of synthesis practices and their evolution in the mainstream of the field of evaluation. Concerns surrounding the production of knowledge syntheses to answer policy questions are not new in the field of evaluation. However, during this last decade, knowledge synthesis methods have expanded as a means to go beyond the limits and constraints of singular evaluations. This scoping review reveals and discusses two key issues with regards to the expansion of knowledge synthesis practices within the field of evaluation: the diversity—and muddling— of methodological practices and synthesis designs, and the frequent omission of quality appraisals.     

美､德个人信息宪法保护路径比较及启示——以个人信息的双重属性切入

个人信息的保护研究一般基于信息的人身性与财产性为选择保护的路径,却忽略了个人信息的人身依附属性.根据自由主义与社群主义对自我的解释得出个人信息具有个体性与公共性的双重属性.基于此双重属性导致美、德两国在个人信息保护模式上有所区别:美国将个人信息作为隐私权保护外延,显示其对信息个体性的追求;德国利用领域理论将个人信息作为人格尊严的保护客体,显示其对信息公共性的偏向.从法律文化视角比较,两国存在价值取向与隐私认可程度的差异,由此造成对个体性和公共性的不同偏向;两国又因司法谦抑主义与公共安全和个人信息保护的竞争,导致保护限缩的共同趋向.两种保护路径反映不同的法律文化的同时,也体现出两国都重视在立法基础上的宪法审查运用,以此平衡个人信息的个体性与公共性.故我国个人信息保护亦需以“审查”作为个人信息保护的有效方式,并以个体性与公共性的动态平衡作为判断标准.具体审查可以从程序上的公正平衡与实体上的合理平衡两方面进行判断,以此为个人信息提供有效保护.此外,打破个体性与公共性平衡状态的唯一变量只能基于公共利益的考量.     

2001-2013年播州土司研究文献综述

为了解“播州土司”研究的期刊成果,本文从中国知网上查询了2001～2013年发表在期刊上的有关“播州土司”研究的文献,从历史的角度、社会的角度和文化的角度进行了分类梳理,并从这三个角度对其相关研究文献进行简述。     

Literature Review of Bozhou Tusi Studies (2001-2013)

Based on the topic of the “Bozhou Tusi”, we obtained 35 publications of Chinese journals from the China Academic Journal Network Publishing Database ( 2001 -2013 ) .This article will review and make so...