“90后”大学生党员理想信念教育问题研究

个人的理想信念与整个国家发展的前途和命运紧密相关,它是社会发展众多决定因素中的思想基础.“90后”的群体特征给学生党员队伍赋予了新的特点.本文就新时期“90后”学生党员理想信念教育的内涵、必要性和紧迫性做了具体阐述,并探讨了“90后”学生党员理想信念教育的具体实施途径和方法.     

普通高校少数民族预科生心理健康教育探析

少数民族预科生是普通高校大学生中的特殊群体,要做好少数民族预科生心理健康教育工作,必须找出符合他们自身发展规律和特点的方式方法。通过对江苏省某高校少数民族预科生的调查,发现来自不同地区的少数民族预科生在人际关系敏感上存在显著差异,不同性别少数民族预科生在躯体化、恐怖因子上存在显著差异,少数民族预科生与汉族学生在躯体化、抑郁、敌对等因子存在显著差异。针对少数民族预科生特点提出了进行心理健康教育的方法。     

浅析90后大学生的励志教育

90后大学生的人生观、价值观及为人处世的方式呈现出独特的个性特征。我们必须加强90后大学生励志教育,使其能够树立正确的价值观,有一定明辨是非的能力,且能够全身心投入到学习中,从而快速高效地提高学生的成才期望值。加强励志教育,可以从全员参与励志教育、切实提高励志教育工作者本身的素质等多个方面进行创新。     

网络时代下的“90后”大学生心理特征及教育创新

从90后大学生的网络行为与心理特征调查入手,通过实证统计和定性访谈,分析归纳了90后大学生典型的网络行为及心理特征。研究结果发现,网络生活化、便利性、休闲娱乐化和互动平等性等都对90后大学生产生了重要影响,在网络环境中成长起来的90后大学生心理特点的主流是积极向上的。最后从积极心理学的视角出发,提出促进90后大学生心理和人格发展的积极心理健康教育的创新路径。     

Review of Five Multilevel Analysis Programs: BMDP-5V,GENMOD, HLM,ML3, VARCL

A class of statistics is introduced for testing stochastic ordering between two independent distributions. This class includes as a special case the celebrated Mann—Whitney—Wilcoxon statistic. The new class is shown to be asymptotically normal both under the null and nonnull hypotheses. It is distribution-free. Using Pitman's asymptotic efficacy it is shown that for some alternatives the Mann—Whitney—Wilcoxon statistic is the member with the highest efficacy, although for others it is not, and the member with the highest efficacy is identified.     

文明的剥落与兽性的彰显——论《蝇王》中主题的递进表现

英国当代作家威廉·戈尔丁的代表作《蝇王》是一部以探索人性为主题的寓言体小说。在这部小说中。作者以一场想象的核战争为背景,以一座荒岛为故事场景,以一批儿童为主要人物,以递进式的主题表现手法,通过展示孩子之间矛盾的递进发展和暴力的递进升级,表现了人性本恶的主题。     

《说文解字》头部名称形声字本义与源义关系举隅

文章选取《说文》中6个表示头部名称的形声字,从该字的源义素是声符字的本义和源义、引申义和假借义三个方面,通过声符系联,得出各个字本义与源义之间的关系,力图为科学汉语字源学的建立提供经过系统整理的文献材料和论证阐释的途径。     

“90后”大学生思想道德研究综述

＂90后＂大学生思想道德研究的成果,主要集中在以不同的内容为指向的思想道德研究及原因研究方面,具体包括人生价值观、道德素质、政治思想等。而从整体趋势上看,＂90后＂大学生的思想道德普遍较好,同时也存在一些问题,其主要原因来自于宏观社会环境和微观家庭、学校教育的影响。要想使研究有所突破,必须科学构架其研究框架,注重研究内容的深化和方法的创新。     

Securing permanence for children in care: A cross-country analysis of citizen's view on adoption versus foster care

If children in child protection cannot be cared for by their natural parents, should they be adopted or live in foster home? Results from a study of representative samples of populations (n = 12 330), in eight European countries—Austria, England, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Norway and Spain—and California, USA, reveal that people would recommend adoption over foster care, if a child in public care cannot grow up with their natural parent(s). There are cross-country differences between populations, and examining if institutional context such as type of child protection system explains differences, we find that child maltreatment-oriented systems are more supportive of adoption than other types of systems. Citizens having little confidence in the child protection system were only weakly correlated with preference for adoption. In conclusion, people prefer adoption as placement options for children in care are more than foster homes, and possible this finding reflects a sort of refamalialization of children into the private sphere.     

Leadership with Imperfect Monitoring

This paper provides experimental evidence on how monitoring intensity shapes the impact of leadership instruments like leading-by-example and punishment. The results show that, with low monitoring intensity, neither leading-by-example nor punishment increases cooperation if the leader can already send nonbinding signals about desired behavior. We identify two different reasons for this effect. Regarding leading-by-example, it is the cautiousness of the leader. Leaders are reluctant to recommend cooperative behavior and act accordingly, even though followers are particularly reciprocal in this context. Regarding punishment, it is the level of monitoring that matters. Monitoring of individual follower behavior increases the cooperation of leaders and followers across all treatments, but in particular, if the leader can punish uncooperative behavior. This result implies that monitoring in itself does not have a negative impact on the inclination to cooperate. It suggests that any motivational crowding out effect derives from a leader’s choice of monitoring, as it signals low trust in the followers. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications.