解读池莉小说创作的主体意识

池莉生活和创作心态朴实平和,这就形成了她独特的平民创作风格。对她创作主体意识的阐释,本文从母性意识、城市情结和真实的自我这三个方面来完成。     

魏紫姚黄——微型作家论

本文为微型作家论 ,是对 2 0世纪 90年代以来中国小说界有代表性的几位作家的点评 ,以揭示他们在 90年代文学格局中的地位 ,以及属于他们自己的风格性的特征。     

嵇康六言诗简论

本文结合嵇康的其它诗文及相关材料对其六言十首进行了梳理,认为以贤人君子理想为核心,这十首六言诗构成了一个有机的整体;它们在浓缩了嵇康的社会与人生理想的同时,也浓缩了其诗文的基本主题。     

试析太极玄学与舞蹈、书法的相通之处

太极玄学与舞蹈、书法三者表面看似无太多关联,实则有着千丝万缕的联系.太极玄学与舞蹈、书法的相通之处,主要体现在“气”、“阴阳”等这些方面,对其表现出的特点进行初步的剖析阐释,指出“内求”、“意”、“空间运作规律”等两两相通之处,并结合部分具体相关的舞剧进行分析.     

不同世界的同样渴求——试论池莉笔下婚姻悲剧里的妻子形象

池莉作为一名当代女作家,以独特的女性视角在她的作品里塑造了许多婚姻悲剧里的妻子形象,如段莉娜、戚润物、曾芒芒,等等。这些妻子尽管知识水平和经历各不相同,但是她们都渴望拥有作为妻子的幸福,因而面对丈夫的婚外情,都采取了不同的方式进行反抗。然而,面对传统婚姻中女性主体意识丧失的困境,她们却是一群顽强抗争的弱者,而要改变这种地位,更加需要的是女性自身的冷静反省。     

生命感悟之剪辑下的人与自然——解读迟子建小说《原始风景》中的生态美

迟子建在<原始风景>中以对生命感悟之剪辑下的人与自然的审视为支点,表达作家对自然生态的现实关注和终极关怀;并在描绘人与白山黑水的自然休戚相关的亲和之美中,凸显出生命烛照下的"原始风景",显露出难能可贵的"绿色"生态意识和谐的生态环境是有生命灵性的自然与人栖居的"绿色之都".     

翻译美学视阈下《瓦尔登湖》徐迟译本评介

《瓦尔登湖》（Walden）是亨利·大卫·梭罗（Henry David Thoreau）经典文学作品,已经成为美国文学宝库中的经典之作。中国译者徐迟首先将其译入国内,译名为《瓦尔登湖》。此后不断出现译者和译本,《瓦尔登湖》一度重译,频繁出版。进入21世纪以来,我国出现了重译《瓦尔登湖》的热潮,这也引起了学术界和翻译界对《瓦尔登湖》汉译本的关注。通过将徐迟译本作为研究对象,从翻译美学新视角切入,对《瓦尔登湖》译文之美进行解构,分析其中作为变量的美学因子,以期为研究《瓦尔登湖》做出一点贡献。     

生态视野下人类文明进程中的困惑——迟子建长篇小说《额尔古纳河右岸》探析

迟子建以她惯有的温情叙述滋养着黑土地文化的写作。长篇小说《额尔古纳河右岸》将生态话语纳入文学书写的维度,为我们展露了现代文明入侵下的鄂温克族民俗文化、生存方式以及生态资源等境况,彰显了在人类文明进程中所遭遇的尴尬、悲哀和无奈。     

“自然”与“情爱”的二维变奏——迟子建小说论

迟子建的小说世界由两个基本的维度构成,一是自然,二是情爱。在自然的维度中,她的小说表露出作家的灵魂和自然精神一起脉动,并且由此可以探究迟子建思想中的“万物有灵论”元素。在此基础上,就能更深入地理解为什么迟子建作品中存在大量的神话,以及这些神话所营造的美学风格和精神内涵。在情爱的维度中,迟子建用女性特有的思维去阐释温情和爱欲,可是当她试图将艺术的笔触伸向城市生活中的这一主题时,却显示出隔膜和僵硬,这是迟子建遇到的艺术难题。     

西部民族地区旅游生态补偿政策实施的实践探索

The ethnic regions of Western Chi￣na are rich in ecological and cultural tourism re￣sources. At the same time, the regions are also ec￣ologically vulnerable areas with large populations of ethnic groups who have lived for a long time in poverty. Based on years’ investigation, it is obvi￣ous that tourism development, even though it can promote local economic development, has had a significant negative impact on the ecology, envi￣ronment and local communities. During the 18 th and 17 th National Congresses of the Communist Pary of China, a policy was announced to improve ecological compensation and accelerate the estab￣lishment of an ecological compensation mecha￣nism. So far, both government and academia have mainly focused on the effects and necessities of building a mechanism for ecological compensation. Of special concern, even if governments at all lev￣els sequentially enacted a series of policie with cer￣tain characteristics of ecological compensation, the public is still questioning the impartiality and legit￣imacy of the charges of such policy of ecological compensation. Thus, the task of implementing the ecological compensation policy faces many obsta￣cles. At present, the core research issue on eco￣logical compensation is no longer just the question of why it should be charged. This question was al￣ready clearly stated in official documents from cen￣tral government. Up to now, the core issues that need clarification are:in practice, how the charge be made; what amount of money should be charged;how will the revenue from the charge be used;how will the revenue derived from the charge be audited; and whether or not this charge can help to achieve government objectives in such a way.
Based on the unique background of the ethnic regions of Western China, this paper deeply analy￣ses issues of implementing policies such as ecologi￣cal compensation for tourism, including the illegi￣bility and legitimacy of who should pay, how much should be paid, and how to manage the funds im￣partially; and providing scientific and reasonable countermeasures to solve these practical problems. Compared with other industries, the tourism indus￣try became the pioneer for the practice of ecologi￣cal compensation as well as the research objective of ecological compensation studies. Some research￣ers defined ecological compensation for tourism as a system of regulating related ecological interests to protect the ecosystems of tourism destinations and promote sustainable development of the tourism in￣dustry ( Zhang Yiqun, Yang Guihua, 2012 ) . Al￣though such a definition is still fuzzy, at least it in￣dicates that the research of ecological compensation for tourism involves interdisciplinary fields inclu￣ding Economics, Sociology, Ecology and Tourism, etc. Currently, the research of ecological compen￣sation for tourism has insufficient first hand empiri￣cal research data. At the same time it has not yet had nationwide impact, either domestically or over￣seas. The research on implementing policies for the ecological compensation of tourism is at an early stage in China.
Obviously, it is hard to find sufficient re￣search results or research methods for reference, which brings certain limitations to this paper. To demonstrate the scope of this study, this paper de￣fined tourism ecological compensation as exploring the feasibility of spending fiscal revenue ( paid by tourism enterprises, tourists or other stakeholders) on protecting natural ecological environment. Based on this definition, this paper generated three actual issues with regard to implementing policies of ecological compensation for tourism, including the vagueness of the charge, the lack of unified, standard levies, and the non-tranparency of fund management. Combined with analyzing the current special background of implementing policies of ec￣ological compensation for tourism in the ethnic re￣gions of Western China, and by especially empha￣sizing the local communities of the ethnic groups who should be compensated, this paper tries to provide scientific and reasonable countermeasures consisting of implementing corresponding national policy, formulating correlated policy in accordance with local conditions and standardizing and institu￣tionalizing fund management. This paper not only attempts to support strongly implementing policies of ecological compensation for tourism at the insti￣tutional level, but also to coordinate the contradic￣tions between tourism development and ecological protection, and local community self - develop￣ment, hoping to achieve the win-win objectives of promoting an ecological compensation policy for tourism, tourism poverty alleviation and ecological civilization.