中国社会护理保险可行性研究

中国自2016年开始在国内多座城市建立社会护理保险试点,但以中国当下的国情是否适合建立社会护理保险制度,是一个紧迫、严肃且值得深究的问题。参照其他国家护理保险制度建设经验,并以德国为主要案例,深入剖析社会护理保险可能存在的人力和财力风险,提出了“护理员悖论”概念。指出在社会养老保险基金和社会医疗保险基金亏损、高缴费率、少子老龄化状况下推行社会护理保险风险巨大,目前或许不是中国推行社会护理保险的最佳时期。     

自我意识的心理学研究理论进展

以孔德悖论为引子 ,考察元认知概念的渊源及其研究模型的提出 ,并由此分析该领域的三种主要理论 ,进而从反映论的观点出发 ,可以明晰地看到元认知和自我意识之间的区别和该领域的研究方向与应用前景     

Distributed Decisions in Networks: Laboratory Study of Routing Splittable Flow

We study network games in which users choose routes in computerized networks susceptible to congestion. In the “unsplittable” condition, route choices are completely unregulated, players are symmetric, each player controls a single unit of flow and chooses a single origin–destination (O–D) path. In the “splittable” condition, which is the main focus of this study, route choices are partly regulated, players are asymmetric, each player controls multiple units of flow and chooses multiple O–D paths to distribute her fleet. In each condition, users choose routes in two types of network: a basic network with three parallel routes and an augmented network with five routes sharing joint links. We construct and subsequently test equilibrium solutions for each combination of condition and network type, and then propose a Markov revision protocol to account for the dynamics of play. In both conditions, route choice behavior approaches equilibrium and the Braess Paradox is clearly manifested.     

Approaching management and organization paradoxes paradoxically: The case for the tetralemma as an expansive encasement strategy

The field of paradox studies keeps struggling to put the notion of paradox into the very centre of organizational life and managerial decision-making, with mixed success. We argue that this research ambition can be realized much more effectively by anchoring the field in three interrelated conceptual approaches which build on paradox as the paradigmatic point of departure. These approaches include Spencer Brown’s form calculus, Niklas Luhmann’s systems and organization theory, and the traditional Indian logical construct of tetralemma. In the proposed argument, paradox constitutes the very identity of organizations as (re-entries of) distinctions drawn in the environment; it is actualized in every act of organizational decision communication, as well as in the process of the continual vanishing and renewal of such acts. In this conception of organizational life, the key challenge is to debunk false distinctions by using tetralemmatization strategies that entail a radical questioning of the problematic observational perspectives.     

上官仪:统计数据与声律理论的悖论——与杜晓勤商榷

杜晓勤<齐梁诗歌向盛唐诗歌的嬗变>一书,依据最新研制成功的"中国古代诗歌声律分析系统"统计数据立论,有些观点受了错误数据的误导.最为突出的是论述上官仪时却抛开统计数据,多用推论臆断建立新说,论证上官仪对唐代新体诗声律学的贡献,认为后来的重要声律理论都祖述<笔札华梁>.通过对<文镜秘府论>等文献认真仔细的研究,发现上官仪对唐代阐述新体诗声律理论的重要人物元兢并无明显的影响,两人的理论主张并不统一,几乎没有证据能证明新说成立.     

Long-Term RCT outcomes for adolescent alcohol and cannabis use within a predominantly Hispanic sample

Because adolescents are unlikely to seek, receive, or complete treatment for alcohol and/or cannabis misuse, it is important to enhance the lasting impact of clinical contacts when they do occur. Adolescents (N = 506; 72.5% Hispanic) were randomized to motivational interviewing (MI) versus alcohol and cannabis education (ACE). Latent growth models estimated change over time. Significant reductions in alcohol use were observed, with slightly greater reductions by 12-month follow-up for MI. Both interventions significantly reduced cannabis use, with no treatment group differences. When outcomes were examined comparing Hispanic to non-Hispanic participants, there were no significant differences in intervention efficacy by group. MI's inherently client-centered and culturally adaptive approach may contribute to its equitable degree of behavior change for youth across race/ethnic backgrounds.