行政诉讼类型界说

行政诉讼类型是依照一定标准对人民法院审理具体行政行为的活动进行归类而形成的诉讼形态。它具有内容的概括性、划分标准的多样性及与诉讼活动联系的密切性三个特征。它与刑事诉讼类型、民事诉讼类型、行政诉讼模式、行政诉讼请求、行政判决有一定的联系与区别，在本质上体现了对行政相对人的权利救济。     

管理者信任行为与员工离职倾向的相关研究

本研究采用自编"管理者信任行为问卷"和"员工离职倾向影响因素问卷",对148名企业员工进行了调查。结果发现:1)管理者信任行为与员工离职倾向之间呈显著负相关。2)离职倾向诸因子在高、低信任行为组中差异显著。3)"开放性交流"表示关怀"权力的分散"三个因子进入回归方程,对员工离职倾向有较好的预测能力。     

科技革命与文化发展

近代科学革命动摇了宗教的思想与信仰，技术革命造就的工业革命隔断了传统化的自然基础。现代科学重新建构了当代人的世界观，现代科技的双重效应成为社会化的重大主题，科技在现代化中的份量在加重，现代科技造就了后工业社会的化模式，科技增强了化的影响和力量。科技革命促进了大众化的兴起，为大众化创造了技术条件，提供了经济条件，赋予了现代内涵。     

我国低碳旅游系统利益相关者关系格局及博弈分析

从我国低碳旅游系统利益相关者界定模糊、权责不清的现状入手,结合目前国内外旅游系统利益相关者研究成果,提出低碳旅游系统相关利益者的内涵;通过对目前低碳旅游系统利益相关者关系格局的分析,提出我国低碳旅游未来发展的系统利益相关者理想模式;在理想模式的基础上,运用共时参与模型和差序参与模型对低碳旅游系统具有代表性的四大相关利益者进行博弈分析,提出基于各利益相关者视角的低碳旅游行为模式,使低碳旅游走向协作发展的道路.     

大学生群体行为突变机理分析及对策研究

本文基于行为科学和突变理论,从大学生群体行为突变的影响因素着手,诠释了学生群体行为从渐变到突变的非线性过程,阐述了大学生群体行为突变的机理。本文认为,为更好地引导大学生,要切实落实人本管理理念,实行灵活调动、有退有进、有增有减的学生群体行为管理,同时应实现现有的状态管理向过程管理的转化,定性管理向以系统思想为指导的定量管理与定性管理相结合的转变。此外,要加强对大学生群体的心理疏导和人文关怀。     

企业大气污染防治的行为逻辑及其补偿探析

中国大气污染防治是政策驱动行为,企业在大气污染物减排中一直处于被动地位,未能发挥其主体地位作用。还原企业主体地位是建立企业持续实施大气污染防治机制的关键。文章通过对中国企业大气污染防治动力不足的原因进行分析,探讨企业大气污染防治的利益取向与行为逻辑,并建立大气污染防治补偿机制,以驱动企业减排,进而达到激励企业主动进行大气污染防治的目标。大气污染防治可以采取财政转移支付、税费优惠、发放排污权和押金退款制度政府补偿方式;也可以采取排污权交易与一对一交易市场补偿方式。      

“公平理论”和“角色理论”视域下的企业反倾销行为决策

反倾销成本与反倾销收益的权衡是国内企业反倾销行为选择的依据。基于角色理论构建了企业反倾销行为的收益矩阵和期望收益函数模型,并进一步分析了存在主导企业和不存在主导企业两种市场格局下国内企业反倾销行为决策方案的选择问题;在此基础上,引入公平理论对企业决策方案进行横向和纵向公平性识别。研究发现：反倾销成本、反倾销收益及行业内其他企业的反倾销申诉概率等因素制约企业最终的反倾销行为决策,两种市场格局背景下国内企业有13种反倾销行为决策方案;发挥行业协会的协调机制,可以有效规避企业间因不公平而采取的“报复”行为。     

城市居民绿色农产品消费行为及其影响因素分析

基于2011年湖北省武汉市汉口地区的问卷调查数据,采用有序的Probit模型分析了城市居民对绿色农产品的消费行为及影响因素。结果发现:城市居民绿色农产品消费显著地受到了收入水平和家庭规模的正向影响;消费者受教育水平越高,实际绿色农产品消费的频数反而越低;年龄、绿色信息关注度、年龄*绿色信息关注度的交叉项对绿色农产品消费频数有显著的正向影响;健康程度对绿色农产品消费频数有显著的负向影响;性别差异对市民绿色农产品消费影响不显著;城市居民消费者个人绿色农产品的认知水平、消费意愿与实际消费结果并不一致。提出应促进绿色农产品的适度规模生产、强化供应链管理、注重市场营销的目标选择与行销技巧等建议。     

Another Issue Comes Out: Gay Rights Policy Voting in Recent U.S. Presidential Elections

Drawing from the theory of policy voting, this study examines the impact of opinions about gay rights on voting for presidential candidates. Qualitative analysis of the major party platforms and candidate campaign rhetoric from the six presidential elections held between 1988 and 2008 indicates that Democratic and Republican presidential candidates began openly expressing opposing positions on gay rights issues in 1992. Quantitative analysis of public opinion shows that, starting in 1992 and continuing through 2008, gay rights issues became more salient to the public, and opinions about gay rights began to exert a significant effect on vote choice. The study concludes with a discussion of the partisan forces that shaped the electoral significance of gay rights issues during the period from 1988 to 2008 and speculation about the role of gay rights issues in shaping future partisan electoral strategy.     

In Vino Pecunia? The Association Between Beverage-Specific Drinking Behavior and Wages

The positive association between moderate alcohol consumption and wages is well documented in the economic literature. Positive health effects as well as networking mechanisms serve as explanations for the “alcohol–income puzzle.” Using individual-based microdata from the SOEP for 2006, we confirm that this relationship exists for Germany as well. More importantly, we shed light on the alcohol–income puzzle by analyzing, for the first time, the association between beverage-specific drinking behavior and wages. In our analysis, we disentangle the general wage effect of drinking into diverse effects for different types of drinkers. Mincerian estimates reveal significant and positive relationships between wine drinkers and wages as well as between multiple beverage drinkers and wages. When splitting the sample into age groups, the “drinking gain” disappears for employees under the age of 35 and increases in size and significance for higher age groups. We also find a “beer gain” for the oldest age group and male residents of rural areas as well as a “cocktail gain” for residents of urban areas. Several explanations for our empirical results are discussed in view of the likelihood that the alcohol–income puzzle is a multicausal phenomenon.