我国国有和民营上市企业风险倾向对比研究

文章旨在洞悉制度因素对企业风险行为影响的内在机理。通过我国国有和民营上市企业风险倾向实证对比, 结果发现:(1)金融危机爆发前, 在整体层面和行业层面上, 国有企业较民营企业都更倾向于冒险, 且二者间的差距不断缩减;(2)危机爆发后, 不同目标水平情况下, 国有和民营企业风险倾向间的对比较此前出现了一定变化;(3)在高于目标水平情况下, 国有和民营企业的风险倾向均与前景理论的预期相悖。这表明制度因素在很大程度上决定了我国企业风险行为, 同时, 企业自身改革、发展水平, 以及所处的经济大环境也会对其风险倾向产生一定的影响。因此, 我国企业风险管理机制构建应立足改革与发展, 努力实现政府、企业和市场多方联动, 内外兼修。     

金融深化与经济增长：西部地区“悖论”的实证

西部地区的金融深化似乎并没有有效促进该地区的经济增长,运用协整理论、误差修正模型和格兰杰因果检验实证分析的结果也表明西部金融深化与经济增长之间确实存在着“悖论”。“悖论”出现的原因是西部地区金融深化难以有效积累资本,并且该地区经济投资效率低下。必须积极推进西部金融体制改革,提高西部金融业的运作效率。加大对西部地区的财政金融支持力度,提升西部产业结构层次,大力发展非国有经济,才能使西部金融深化有效促进该地区经济增长。     

再谈线性规划的悖论

利用线性规划的模型，讨论了目标函数增量，影子价格，常数项增量的特征区间之间的关系，从而给出了线性规划中出现“反多而少”悖论现象的充要条件．并将参考文献[1]中情况进行了推广．     

多棱镜像营造的跨文化景观 ——《英国情人》与《扶桑》之比较

爱默生的散文贯穿着一条清晰的主线:反对权威、束缚,追求独立、自由.然而,由于他的散文风格表现出以下一些基本特征:语言缺乏连贯性,充满似是而非和否定的句子,使得读者难以捉摸他的话语里的真实含义.研究发现,爱默生模糊的语言风格很接近中国老子似是而非的语言风格,而二人的语言风格代表着他们的真理观和语言观.爱默生刻意通过不连贯、似是而非和否定的修辞手法来表达其哲学主题,以启发读者通过文本寻找真理,而不是直接告诉读者真理是什么.     

服务补救悖论及其应用价值探讨

服务补救悖论是否有效，是否能够被实际运用一直是服务营销的一个争论内容。只有在清晰的界定其内涵，分析和评价了服务补救悖论的有效性和道德性以后，才能指明实施服务补救悖论的条件、程序和注意事项，从而澄清在此问题上的理论分歧和企业面临的实际困惑，有助于服务类企业更好地实施服务补救悖论以提升顾客满意度。     

Not forgetting happiness: the tripartite model of disability and its application in literary criticism

This interdisciplinary article draws on the social sciences to posit a tripartite model from which literary research into disability can benefit. Ableism and disablism are defined by normative positivisms and non-normative negativisms respectively, but consideration is also given to non-normative positivisms. Informed by experiential knowledge, the model is illustrated with reference to a trilogy of literary representations of blindness: George Sava’s novel Happiness is Blind, Brian Friel’s play Molly Sweeney, and Stephen Kuusisto’s memoir Eavesdropping. The result is a complex reading that recognises problems but also non-normative renderings of happiness.     

Learning in the Allais paradox

Whereas both the Allais paradox, the first empirical challenge of the classical rationality assumptions, and learning have been the focus of many experimental investigations, no experimental study exists today into learning in the pure context of the Allais paradox. This paper presents such a study. We find that choices converge to expected utility maximization if subjects are given the opportunity to learn by both thought and experience, but less so when they learn by thought only. To the extent that genuine preferences should be measured with proper learning and incentives, our study gives the first pure demonstration that irrationalities such as in the Allais paradox are less pronounced than often thought. Paul Anand and Stefan Trautmann made helpful comments.     

Survival through the Allais paradox

This paper investigates the allegation that behavior such as the Allais Paradox reduces the probability of survival. Examples are demonstrated where maximizing probability of survival in two choice situations imply a set of choices that add up to the Allais Paradox.     

现代性悖论的消解与社会技术的创新——关于现代性问题的技术哲学思考

现代性问题是我们这个时代的焦点问题之一。现代性是一种价值取向,标志着现代化运动所追求的基本目标,是对现代化运动所倡导的那些最基本和最重要的价值的提炼、概括和张扬。现代性的根据和基础是现代化的历史运动。而现代性一经形成,又规范、制约着现代化运动朝着“现代”的方向去演进。人们对现代性的关注已经从关于现代性的事实判断转向关于现代性的价值判断,这正是“现代性”成为“问题”的关键所在。如果只关注现代性的正面功能,而忽视现代性的负面影响,那么中国的现代化进程将难以持续,中国的和谐社会建设就可能成为泡影。“后现代性世界”,实际上并不是也不可能是现代性之外的某种力量使然,而是现代性内在的超越本性的必然结果。因此,所谓“后现代性”并不是现代性的自我否定,而是现代性的自我完善、补充与提升。从自然技术与社会技术的关系看,解决这两种技术的“滥用”和“误用”问题的根本途径在于社会技术创新。     

E-Capacities and the Ellsberg Paradox

Ellsberg's (1961) famous paradox shows that decision-makers give events with known probabilities a higher weight in their outcome evaluation. In the same article, Ellsberg suggests a preference representation which has intuitive appeal but lacks an axiomatic foundation. Schmeidler (1989) and Gilboa (1987) provide an axiomatisation for expected utility with non-additive probabilities. This paper introduces E-capacities as a representation of beliefs which incorporates objective information about the probability of events. It can be shown that the Choquet integral of an E-capacity is the Ellsberg representation. The paper further explores properties of this representation of beliefs and provides an axiomatisation for them.