实践导向管理研究评价的基本问题探讨——兼论由“出路与展望:直面中国管理实践”引发的学术争鸣

对《出路与展望》一文引起的学术争鸣进行评论,探讨实践导向管理研究评价的基本问题。实践导向管理研究包括发现管理新知的科学基础研究和解决问题的实践应用研究2个基本范畴,其主要特点应当是实践的指向性、过程的科学性、结果的实效性和成果的创新性。2种实践导向管理研究的评价目标定位虽然存在一定差异,但均可以通过形式评价、内容评价和效用评价的不同指标及其权重设置进行合理评价。当然,要规范这类研究的评价还要做好对评价主体的遴选、监督和激励的评价主体管理。     

试论教学研究型大学的办学理念

教学研究型大学就是以教学为中心、以研究为动力的大学。教学研究型大学是推进中国高等教育大众化进程的中坚力量。衡量一所大学是否属于教学研究型大学的指标有硕士学位数/年、生师比、科研经费、本科生与研究生的比例、小班教学规模。教学研究型大学在办学理念上要做到求实、创新、灵活、有成效。     

基于“物的新农村”与“人的新农村”并进战略的“农村劳动力转移”新解

从建设"新农村"视角讨论农村劳动力转移研究中若干有分歧的问题。从本质上看,农村劳动力转移的对象是传统农村劳动者,而不是农村剩余劳动力。所谓农村劳动力转移,不仅指向城镇的转移,也包括向现代化农村的转移;不仅指向第二、三产业转移,也包括向现代化农业转移;不仅指农民向市民的转变,也包括传统农民向现代化农民的转变。农村劳动力转移是一个不断随着工农业现代化以及农民现代化的渐进过程。大力推进城镇化和工业化的同时,大力推进农业现代化,加强新农村建设,保证"物的新农村"和"人的新农村"协同并进,是推动农村劳动力有序、稳步转移的根本途径。     

烟台市县域经济指向性原则选择初探

县域经济是区域经济的重要组成部分,发展县域经济应以市场为导向,以经济社会效益为目标,以指向性原则为指导。做好县域经济这篇文章,应从解决目前存在的问题入手,探讨符合指向性原则的发展思路。     

从“现实的人”到“以人为本”——从马克思的自然观解析“以人为本”的生态维度

马克思的人化自然观指出,人与自然在实践基础上形成对立统一的辩证关系,"现实的人"与"现实的自然"的辩证互动过程就是逐步实现人的全面发展的社会历史进程。科学发展观的"以人为本"内蕴了"现实的人"的逻辑起点,其实质是"以‘现实的人’为本"与"以‘现实的自然’为本"的辩证统一,就是将实现人的全面发展的价值目标诉诸于人—自然—社会整体协调统一的具体实践中,坚持全面、协调、可持续的发展道路,体现了人的解放和自然的解放的内在统一。因此,科学发展观的"以人为本"蕴含着人与自然和谐统一的生态维度。     

略论东亚金融危机与东亚模式

东亚金融危机产生的原因有许多 ,模式危机只是其中之一 ,而且就东亚模式本身来说 ,不同国家和地区的发展模式也不尽相同。因此我们应当区别对待 ,并划分为失败和成功的模式进行分析 ,以便最终找到适合东亚各国的发展之路     

加强高校院（系）党建工作的几点思考

加强新世纪高校院(系)党建工作,既是落实科学发展观的需要,也是充分发挥院(系)党组织的政治核心作用,培养社会主义事业的建设者和接班人的需要。为了更好地加强院(系)党建工作,需要采取以下对策:(1)确立以人为本的新理念;(2)加强院(系)党组织领导班子的建设;(3)围绕中心抓党建;(4)建立党政工团齐抓共管的新机制;(5)增强理论意识、政治意识、大局意识、创新意识;(6)坚持以理服人、以情感人等方法。     

应高度重视东南亚金融危机对我市外向型经济发展的影响

东南亚金融危机虽然未曾对我国“汇”“股”两市形成直接冲击但它对我国经济发展的负面影响正在不断显现。而就佛山市的外向型经济发展来说,则更是面临严峻挑战。东南亚金融危机使佛山市商品出口严重受阻,对外招商引资也变得难以把握。我们一定要对此予以高度重视,积极调整出口贸易的产业及其产品结构、地区结构,努力改善投资环境,拓展对外直接投资,逐步实现佛山市外向型经济发展模式的战略性转轨,最大限度地化解金融危机的负面影响     

How to Evaluate Government Performance while Building a Rule of Law Government in China*

Building a law-based government is a central element of the comprehensive framework for promoting the rule of law in China, while using evaluation to catalyze growth is in line with the incentive principle of management studies. Since China started to implement reform and opening up over thirty years ago, rule of law development and organizational evaluation have gone through several stages, each with different characteristics. Efforts to build a law-based government have met with success, but what the country now has is essentially still goal-oriented assessment. At present, this suffers from the lack of a clear goal orientation or definition of functions, an imperfect technical system and unsound motivation mechanisms, not to mention the practical problems of each government department going its own way, duplicating evaluations or being left rudderless. Drawing on a combination of value rationality and instrumental rationality and using government performance evaluation to promote the building of a law-based government not only conforms to the spirit of the rule of law and value rationality in government performance, but also strengthens the role of evaluation as an instrument for organizational management. Therefore, we need to create new evaluation theories, expand public participation, introducing diversified evaluating entities, improve technical systems, strengthen institutional buildup, and foster a performance-based culture. In addition, replacing goal-oriented assessment with performance evaluation will help the emergence of a new discipline—the performance evaluation of rule of law government, thus promoting multidisciplinary efforts to integrate and create new public administration theories in China.     

Revisiting the effectiveness of the employment‐oriented welfare state: Considering the quality of employment achievement

The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of an employment‐oriented welfare state. While previous studies have focused on employment growth, this study considers the quality of employment, especially its mediating impact between public social expenditure and fiscal soundness. Three‐step mediated regression analysis was conducted on a data sample from 19 developed countries from 1991 to 2013. The results show that while public social expenditure negatively affects fiscal soundness, if it promotes total and part‐time employment, it can positively affect fiscal soundness. However, when the incidence of involuntary part‐time employment is high, public social expenditure and its impact on employment performance no longer guarantee fiscal soundness. This study addresses the importance of promoting not only employment growth but also employment quality to secure fiscal soundness.