高等学校行政权力与学术权力的研究综述

对高等学校行政权力与学术权力的研究由来已久。从高校行政权力和学术权力基本概念的界定到分类,从行政权力和学术权力的功能到行政权力和学术权力的模式,从我国高校行政权力和学术权力的结构现状到解决我国高校行政权力和学术权力问题的思路,本文做了较为系统的梳理和相应的评述。     

论唐近体律诗对永明体的改进

相比而言,齐梁永明之前,诗歌的创作主要是“外部研究”,注重诗歌内容,强调诗、乐、舞的二维或三维的统一;自永明后转向“内部研究”,注重诗歌形式,诗歌回归自我,关注文本、语言形式本身。唐近体格律诗对永明体的改进主要表现在对偶和声律上:1、声律规则的二元化;2、联与联之间的“黏”;3、不拘泥于大小韵;4、取消傍纽、正纽之界限。     

中国通用航空法律制度及其完善

为促进通用航空事业的发展,中国的通用航空法律制度亟待完善。中国须按照国际法规定重新界定通用航空的法律定义,完善通用航空法律法规体系,修改有关规定,规范对社会生活有重大影响的通用航空活动,为通用航空的发展创造良好的法律保障环境。     

能源补贴改革对资源效率和环境污染治理影响研究——基于动态CGE模型的分析

本文构建动态CGE模型,以化石和可再生能源补贴政策为对象,模拟不同类型能源补贴政策改革对经济发展、资源效率、碳排放及雾霾治理的差异性影响。研究表明:总体而言,能源补贴政策对宏观经济具有积极的促进作用,但在一定程度上会提高能源消费强度;不同类型的能源补贴政策方案影响的差异性较大,化石能源在促进经济增长的同时,对环境改善和碳排放目标实现产生不利影响,特别是煤炭补贴能有效降低能源使用成本,极大促进产业总产出和经济增长,但会不利于环境改善,对可再生能源补贴有利于能源利用效率提高和人均资源盈余改善,降低污染物和雾霾排放增速;因此,必须注重不同类型能源补贴政策协调性和差异性,短期内以化石能源补贴为主,长期而言,应逐步加大可再生能源补贴,更加有利于低碳转型和环境改善。     

论土壤环境的保护、改善与风险防控

为切实保护土壤环境,防治和减少土壤污染,中国立法机关正在着手制定《土壤污染防治法》.针对中国土壤环境质量总体下降、土壤污染日趋严重的现状,如何结合中国土壤环境保护和土壤污染防治的实际情况,吸取西方国家\     

高校提升文化软实力措施浅谈

当今世界各国之间的竞争,已经转为以文化为主的综合国力的竞争。作为思想库、知识库和人才库的高校,应该坚持科学发展观,对自身文化软实力建设进行科学规划。探讨高校软实力建设的重要性以及高校提升软实力的基本措施,可为提升我国软实力建设做出应有贡献     

新冠肺炎疫情对乡村人居环境治理的影响及提升策略分析——基于安徽的调查分析

基于安徽省443个调研数据对村民乡村人居环境治理现状认知和参与乡村人居环境治理意愿响应进行分析。结果表明,农村基础设施供给数量和质量不均衡问题依然存在,基层卫生保障条件水平还有较大提升空间,村民参与人居环境治理水平相对偏低,互联网在乡村人居环境治理中的作用开始显现。大部分村民愿意以出资方式参与乡村人居环境治理水平提升行动,村民对村庄环境提升作用认识、对村干部信任程度对他们的出资意愿具有显著正向影响。建议在乡村人居环境治理中关注乡村人居环境内涵建设,多措并举提升乡村人居环境治理质量。     

Evaluation of the public health achievements made by projects supported by a federal contract mechanism at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA

In 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established the Achieving Public Health Impact through Research (APHIR) contract mechanism. APHIR provides CDC’s Centers, Institute, and Offices (CIOs) a mechanism that supports multiyear, high impact public health research. Awarded projects supported research on a wide range of topics (e.g., cancer surveillance, HIV education programs, development of biological assays, and evaluation of traumatic brain injury prevention programs) and achieved diverse outcomes (e.g., contribution to the body of knowledge in their field, changes in practice and health service delivery, and capacity building). This article describes how existing impact frameworks and a variety of methods and tools (key informant interviews, online survey, bibliometric analysis, Altmetric and document reviews) were used to identify the outcomes achieved by awarded projects. The approach discussed in this paper can be used to evaluate projects that involve a diversity of activities and outcomes.     

Evaluating the design and implementation fidelity of an adapted Plan-Do-Study-Act approach to improve health system performance in a Nigerian state

BackgroundThe Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is fundamental to many quality improvement (QI) models. For the approach to be effective in the real-world, variants must align with standard elements of the PDSA. This study evaluates the alignment between theory, design and implementation fidelity of a PDSA variant adapted for Nigeria’s health system performance improvement.MethodsAn iterative consensus building approach was used to develop a scorecard evaluating new conceptual indices of design and implementation fidelity of QI interventions (design and implementation index, defects and gaps) based on Taylor’s theoretical framework.ResultsDesign (adaptation) scores were optimal across all standard features indicating that design was well adapted to the typical PDSA. Conversely, implementation fidelity scores were only optimal with two standard features: prediction-based test of change and the use of data over time. The other features, use of multiple iterative cycles and documentation had implementation gaps of 17 % and 50 % respectively.ConclusionThis study demonstrates how both adaptation and implementation fidelity are important for success of QI interventions. It also presents an approach for evaluating other QI models using Taylor’s PDSA assessment framework as a guide, which might serve to strengthen the theory behind future QI models and provide guidance on their appropriate use.     

Managing knowledge in supply chains: a catalyst to triple bottom line sustainability

Abstract

Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) and knowledge management’s (KM) positive role in improving supply chain development and performance have both attracted attention in recent years, the former arguably stimulated by the triple bottom line (TBL). Despite the positive development, there is a paucity of theoretical and empirical studies identifying the broad capabilities that affect a firm’s ability to simultaneously pursue economic, environmental and social success. We use the natural-resource-based (NRBV) and knowledge-based (KBV) views to develop a series of propositions linking KM capability to strategic and operational supply chain sustainability and competiveness and test their veracity with practicing managers (n?=?275). We offer a systematic analysis of KM’s role in the development of SSCM. The findings confirm the credibility of the theoretical propositions and identify how different KM processes specifically facilitate strategic or operational development of SSCs. We provide researchers with a framework to guide future research at the KM/TBL nexus.