教育程度与分配公平感:结构地位与相对剥夺视角下的双重考察

基于结构决定与相对剥夺的两种视角,本文研究发现了教育程度对收入分配公平感的复杂影响路径。教育程度作为优势性地位获得,对分配公平感存在正向影响。教育程度越高,收入分配公平感越强。但这种正向影响也存在条件性：教育作为个人地位投资,激发相应的回报期待,随着基于教育投入的期待收入与实际收入差距的扩大,这种正向影响会降低,且教育程度越高,降低的幅度越大。这一条件性的发现有利于解释既有研究的矛盾结论,具有重要的社会意涵：当教育投资作为“制度化手段”无法实现地位获得这一“文化目标”时,这种“断裂”可能会引发“分配不公”的心理失范。     

Engaging men for gender justice: Overcoming barriers to girls' education in the Pashtun tribes of Pakistan

Resistance to girls' education is a social justice and human rights issue in many countries. In Pakistan, where the lowest school enrollment for girls is in Pashtun areas bordering Afghanistan, it is especially problematic. Pashtun society is patriarchal: Men have the power to construct obstacles to girls' education, and to remove them. This article therefore explores a different way of overcoming barriers to gender justice, namely through the participation of men. A qualitative Delphi process and in‐depth interviews with Pashtun men led to their consensus on seven key points of leverage where action could be taken. Participants agreed that progress toward gender parity could be achieved only by making allies of powerful community leaders, especially religious leaders, and by utilizing existing institutions, such as the mosque, Jirga (council of elders), and the men's guest house. For each point of leverage, a policy recommendation is made for increasing girls' participation in education.     

支付能力的正义向度——对经济危机的道德哲学分析

支付能力是自由能力的一部分,支付能力标识自由存在的真实状况。社会成员支付能力状况取决于社会财富分配的背景性制度安排与矫正正义。应当警惕作为专家系统的金融资本特殊利益集团的风险性掠夺。矫正正义可以在现代契约论的立场得到充分辩护,它是全体社会成员构建起的用以维护平等基本自由权利的保险机制。经济的可持续发展与社会的长治久安,有赖于社会有效支付能力、尤其是贫困者的有效支付能力的提高。国家应当在提高社会有效支付能力中有所作为。     

彝族地区“人命案”刑事司法的最佳本土模式——读《彝族本土刑法与国家刑法的司法实践对比分析》一文有感兼与马林英教授等商榷

马林英教授等撰写的《彝族本土刑法与国家刑法的司法实践对比分析——以凉山彝族农村人命案司法实践为例》一文,肯定了彝族民间刑法及刑事司法对“人命案”处理的合理性。笔者的分析指出,从实体法角度,彝族刑法对“人命案”犯罪构成和刑事责任的界定存在不合法且不合情理之处;从程序法角度,本土刑事司法程序不能很好保障“人命案”被告人的基本诉讼权利。在此基础上,提出彝族地区“人命案”刑事司法最佳本土模式的可能方向是,构建与彝族传统司法接轨的刑事和解机制。     

论儒商

儒家文化培养和造就了我国一代代的儒商 ,历代儒商巨子的共同特点是具有高文化品位、智勇合一的性格、坚韧不拔的毅力以及强烈的社会责任感。在商业运用中 ,他们自觉以“义”驭利 ,道德和经济合一 ,而使事业获得成功 ;经营则以诚信为本 ,树立良好的商业形象 ,而使利润稳步上升 ;他们重视人的修养、人的素质和人伦关系 ,以“仁”为终极目标 ,采取各种形式回报社会而使其人生价值得以实现     

阿罗悖论的起源及其在实践中的应用

阿罗悖论是经济理论界的哥德尔定理。本文从历史与机制两方面详尽分析阿罗悖论的起源 ,认为在'剩余'产品社会出现后 ,由于自然约束的松弛 ,无论运用投票选择机制 ,还是货币选择机制 ,都无法在满足所有个人私有利益的前提下 ,从逻辑上导出社会整体利益同时也被满足的结论 ;'剩余'产品的出现及自然约束的松弛 ,是阿罗悖论出现的深层原因。文中还运用阿罗悖论对公平与效率的分离问题和确立中国社会主义市场经济体制的决策过程进行了分析。     

涉税犯罪的刑事司法反思

由于税收的专业性与复杂性,使涉税犯罪刑事司法制度具有自身特色。随着我国经济的发展,涉税犯罪不可避免地呈现上升趋势,有关涉税犯罪刑事司法制度的一些不足也逐渐暴露出来。建立税务警察、税收司法机关等治理涉税犯罪案件的专门机构,完善治理涉税犯罪案件的程序,对于遏制涉税犯罪具有重要意义。     

辛亥革命以来中国司法裁判观念的变迁

辛亥革命至今的百年间,中国社会的主流司法观念经历了一个曲折的变化过程。司法裁判观念发展轨迹是从传统性到西方化,再从革命性到专业化,今天则处于纷纭复杂的矛盾纠结之中。     

警察出庭作证制度的构建

证人出庭作证,是控辩式庭审模式的必然要求,而警察证人是证人的一种,警察出庭作证对于推进证人出庭作证起到至关重要的作用。然而在我国,警察极少以证人身份出庭作证。其实,警察出庭作证有其必要性。但是,由于警察证人毕竟是一种特殊的证人,这就决定了警察出庭作证制度与普通证人作证制度有一定的差异。     

The KIND Program for Adolescent Family and Dating Violence

Adolescent relational violence has significant and pervasive impacts for young people's current and future relationships. It is known that there is a cross-over between adolescent family violence and other offending behaviour, meaning there is a need for youth justice systems to recognise and respond to these forms of violence. This paper outlines a pilot intervention, the KIND Program, run in Youth Justice South Australia, and aimed at intervening with adolescent family and dating violence. KIND aims to provide tailored systemic intervention to young people and their support network, reducing violence while increasing connection and strength within relationships. The pilot of KIND ran for seven months in 2017, and had eight families participating in the program. Participation in, feedback from, and impact of the program suggest that participation was worthwhile and useful for young people and their families. The KIND Program would benefit from a more extensive pilot period to explore the outcomes of this form of intervention.