生育行动释析

利用理解社会学的原理和方法并综合已有的研究成果，对生育行动类型进行划分和阐述，并试图在社会学理论和人口学的经验分析之间筑建一道便利的桥梁。     

论国际反规避的合法性与合理性

长期以来,反规避作为反倾销的延续和发展,在反倾销法上曾一度被指责为理论目标与现实相冲突,尤其是在反规避被理解为贸易保护主义措施的背景下,对反规避性质的界定更多是否定意义上的。从辩证角度看,反规避不仅具有合法性,也具有明显的合理性,反规避立法与现有的法律体系具有相融性和协调性,反规避法调整的后果事实上具有相当的积极作用。所以,正确认识反规避的合法性与合理性对国际反规避统一立法和我国反规避立法的完善具有明显的现实意义。     

体情·思理·悟境——"庄周梦蝶"的三种解释路向

"梦蝶"寓言历经千载有着极为丰富的阐释,然条分缕析,大抵可分为三类:第一类解释抉发其梦幻之义,因其中多羼杂着浓烈的情绪感受,故称之"情"的体验。第二类解释则从"梦蝶"寓言中寻绎出万物变化的道理,故称之"理"的思致。第三类解释以齐物之境解读蝴蝶梦,故称之"境"的领悟。三种解释路向各有其合理之处,自成一说,但三者之间有着内在的关联,而且它们在理解的层次上是有高低之分的。     

工程项目建设和运营阶段有限理性的应对

工程项目的建设和运营阶段在整个项目周期中占重要地位,而决策者有限理性行为导致项目初期目标在这两阶段发生偏差。分析了有限理性在项目建设、运营阶段的表现之后,提出可以通过项目中的知识管理和信息的事后补充两种方法来应对建设和运营阶段的有限理性,并分别构建了两种方法所对应的模型,希望对工程项目管理具有一定的理论及实际意义。     

战斗的作者应该注重于“论争”——读《中国现代文学论争史》

论争是人类古已有之的传统 ,能展示人类自身的智慧和风采。但是只有进步的论争才能真正推进文化、学术的提高与传播 ,这就要求作家、批评家们不仅要有战斗的“论争”精神 ,更应坚持理性、平等、自由的原则 ,本着对学术文化负责的态度开展论争     

理性选择理论的演变与法经济学的发展

作为法经济学理论基石的理性选择理论，其形成和演变在于对人类行为的基本假设以及不断修正这一基本假设。博弈论承认个人理性与集体理性之间的冲突，突破了信息完全和市场充分的假设，将信息成本和对策成本纳入到了理性选择的影响因素中，扩大了理性选择理论的适用范围。而行为法经济学从有限理性、有限意志、有限自利这一崭新的角度，弥补了理性选择理论的不足，揭开了法经济学的新一轮发展。     

论历史研究中一些哲学问题——历史研究与想像力

通过探讨历史连续性与非连续性,历史研究中重视史料与发挥合理想像,以及历史著述之有限性和不可避免之当代性,揭示出历史与历史研究之复杂性。指出完全恢复历史本来面貌,不仅不可能,而且只能是一种幼稚的幻想。同时,在探讨历史理性与历史规律联系时,指出不能如后现代思想家那样把历史断裂绝对化,但也不能把历史连续性和规律性绝对化。在探讨历史研究现状时,通史研究必须建立在专史与微观史研究基础上,而中国专史与微观史研究恰恰比较薄弱。     

和谐社会建设中公共理性发展战略与策略初探

建设和谐社会必须进行全民基础上的开放持久的学习,从而使公众在整体上拥有进行公共选择的理性和监督的能力,这是中国21世纪文明社会发展的重大战略方向。通过对公共理性内涵的界定,提出了基于网络环境发展公共理性的策略与方法。在对处理人类活动系统问题的软系统方法论进行分析的基础上,提出了用于发展公共理性的公共智能模式以及公共理性的形式化表达方法,从而为网络环境下公共理性的发展提供了一条可以被认知和实践的途径。     

Overcoming the Glass Barriers: Reflection and Action in the ‘Women to the Top’ Programme

Numerous equality programmes have been launched with the aim of promoting a more gender equal work life, yet little substantial action has been reported. This article presents a study of the Women to the Top programme in Sweden, supported by the European Union (EU) and aimed at promoting more women into top management positions. The research suggests that large‐scale projects assembling such heterogeneous actors as industry representatives, politicians and scholars tend to generate further reflection and discussion rather than promoting adequate and highly needed action. Drawing upon Brunsson's distinction between action rationality and decision rationality, the relatively modest effects of large‐scale equality programmes are examined, not in terms of a lack of commitment or competence on the part of the participants but as a matter of the disjunction between reflection and action. Reconciling reflection and action, that is, emphasizing not only reflection on gender inequality but also privileging various forms of practical action (such as new policies, the appointment of female managers, restructuring gendered wage inequalities or new recruitment procedures), is therefore a top priority for policymakers desiring more substantial changes in the gendered outline of industry.     

The role of aspirations and aspirations adaptation in explaining satisficing and bounded rationality

The explanation of bounded rationality in terms of satisficing has been received with skepticism, but Simon's claim that satisficing reflects aspirations and their adaptation could help resolve the matter, particularly taking account of the amplifications introduced by Selten to include motivational factors. Experimental investigations by Guth and his colleagues provide some support. Open-ended, in-depth interviews by Bewley and Schwartz help explain the factors that influence aspirations (which may differ for different tasks), giving attention to affective influences and also to context. They suggest a positive but more complicated relationship between the relative success in realizing profits aspirations and the adaptation of those aspirations, and also in the consequences that aspiration levels have for bounded rationality.