现代小说叙事主体的分化及其比较

叙事主体主要包括隐含作者和叙述者,传统小说中二者基本一致,普遍信奉叙述者权威的原则。在传统小说向现代小说的转变中,叙事主体以及主体的评价都发生了变化。由于中西现代小说的内涵不同,导致这些变化也出现了差异:西方现代小说打破了传统“全知叙事”的方式,其主体分化动摇了叙述者权威,主体评价侧重从传统的单一评价转向多重评价;中国现代小说摆脱了传统白话“口述”方式的“全知叙事”,基本上仍信奉叙述者权威,主体评价侧重从传统的显性评价转向隐性评价。在新时期,中国小说也出现了西方意义上的叙事主体分化。     

汪曾祺小说的“传统”与“现代”——从《聊斋新义》谈起

本文从分析《聊斋新义》系列小说的内容入手 ,结合汪曾祺本人的创作谈 ,讨论汪曾祺 2 0世纪 80年代的小说观念 ,尤其是他对传统与现代的关系问题的理解 ,以及这些理解对其创作产生的影响。汪曾祺对“现代”的理解基本局限于现代派手法 ,如意识流 ;在他的创作中 ,传统与现代意识构成了一种相反相成的微妙关系 ,这一点也比较突出地体现在他对宋人笔记和唐人传奇的看法中     

作品意义观的嬗变浅析

本文通过对作品意义观的梳理 ,初步分析由作品再现世界、表达作者意图至作品作为文本自身的意义分析 ,到接受美学读者创造意义的意义观嬗变 ,着重认识现代解释学将作品、作家、世界、读者重新统一起来的重要意义。而作品意义观的嬗变潜在导源于哲学美学观的历史性转折 ,折射出人类价值观念的变迁、危机和克服危机的努力     

论编辑退稿的科学公正性原则

退稿是编辑出版工作中的重要环节，必须有科学的用稿标准、充分的退稿理由、合理的评价体系、规范先进的退稿机制、认真负责的工作态度，坚持科学公正性原则。     

佛山科学技术学院学报近年文献计量分析

用文献计量学的方法,对《佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版)》1999～2003年出版的论文进行统计和分析,结果表明:年均载文量呈上升趋势;围绕学院重点栏目开辟的核心栏目发展稳定,特色栏目发展减缓;引文量和影响因子呈上升趋势,但高质量稿件比例不是很大。针对这些问题,应采取以下措施:编辑审稿时将引文信息量作为稿件取舍的依据之一;注重特色栏目建设;实行优稿优酬以吸引高质量外稿;建议学院制定一定的优惠政策以减少高质量稿件外流。     

明清之际"诗史"观的新进展--吴伟业知人论世观内涵新探

吴伟业知人论世观与其以"心史"为"诗史"的文学思想相结合,既突破了传统知人论世批评的政治教化决定论与"文如其人"的思维模式,又突破了明代诗学脱离社会现实的弊端,具有明清之际知人论世批评重经世致用与时运的共同特征,并形成了自己独特的内涵,体现了明清之际"诗史"观的新进展。     

诠释之度与翻译之界——“过度诠释”对翻译研究的启示

翻译与诠释均以意义问题为核心,是融合多方面主客观因素的有机整体.在解构主义的思潮中,翻译与诠释领域出现了“过度翻译”与“过度诠释”的现象.艾柯关于诠释与过度诠释的论述以文本意义为中心,分析诠释过程中“作者意图”、“作品意图”和“读者意图”三者之间的矛盾与联系.这一思想给予翻译研究重要启示.全面系统的翻译研究应以“作品意图”来限制译者诠释的限度,综合考量翻译内外各项主客观因素,避免“过度诠释”对翻译研究产生的消极影响.     

The role of human and social board capital in driving CSR reporting

The objective of this paper is to analyze the effect of the professional, technical and relational background (human and social capital) of outside directors on promoting firm CSR disclosure. Following the Hillman et al. (2000) taxonomy of board members, we classify outside directors as business experts, support specialists and community influential, and examine whether business and technical expertise or political ties in the boardroom affect CSR disclosure.This study confirms that not all outside directors are equally effective in improving CSR disclosure and that only certain kinds of outside directors, those classified as support specialists, help promote it. On the other hand, our findings also show that directors with previous experience as politicians affect CSR disclosure negatively, probably due to their interests in safeguarding their reputation within the company, in avoiding public scrutiny and in protecting their political connections. In addition, our set of analysis with interaction effects reveals that powerful CEOs have the incentive to promote CSR-related strategies and to convince business experts and support specialist directors to enhance profitable sustainability strategies and transparency in CSR disclosure. Nevertheless, the powerful CEO effect is not enough to compensate the negative role of political directors on CSR reporting. Therefore, this paper supports the theories in favor of analyzing the multiple configurations of corporate governance mechanisms by adopting a holistic approach, and the need to combine these configurations in order to analyze their impact on CSR behavior.     

From primacy to purpose commitment: How emerging profit-with-purpose corporations open new corporate governance avenues

This paper aims at contributing to corporate governance theory by developing a model of governance that takes into account a recent legal innovation: the introduction of purpose-driven legal business forms in the corporate law of several countries. Current debates in such theory oppose models that grant “primacy” (i.e., ultimate control rights) to different constituencies. The resulting uncertainty proves problematic in the face of new, urgent social and environmental stakes that are difficult to represent in traditional governance bodies. Newly adopted profit-with-purpose corporate forms' introduction of a “purpose” in corporate contracts renews these debates. We show that through the “purpose commitment” model it enables, the distribution of control rights in the governance system is decoupled from the objectives assigned to the corporation. This new approach renews the formal role of management, and corporations’ accountability to society. We explore the theoretical, practical, and political consequences of this new model.     

Creating a positive emotional culture: Effect of internal communication and impact on employee supportive behaviors

The study surveyed 506 employees in the United States to test the effect of internal communication (i.e., corporate-level symmetrical and leadership-level responsive communications) on fostering a positive emotional culture characterized by companionate love, joy, pride, and gratitude. In addition, we tested the interplay between corporate internal communication and a positive emotional culture and its influence on supportive employee behaviors, specifically, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and employee advocacy. Results indicated that symmetrical communication and responsive leadership communication cultivated a positive emotional culture in organizations. Such culture also fostered employee OCB and advocacy. Moreover, corporate symmetrical communication directly and positively influenced employee OCB. Finally, this study found that employee OCB positively affected employee advocacy. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings for public relations scholars and practitioners were discussed.