Increasing the Effectiveness of Student Evaluation of Instructor Data through a Factor Score Comparative Report

Effective student evaluation of instructor instruments must provide norm, or comparative, data to aid interpretation. This note highlights an innovative factor score comparative report. Rather than merely reporting comparative data on individual questions items, the innovative report provides comparative percentile data on the six factors underlying our thirty-three item questionnaire. The faculty indicated overwhelming support for the new report. The note also briefly mentions three other activities that are essential for student evaluation of instructor data to improve teacher effectiveness. Our goal is to stimulate other colleges to adopt the innovative norming practice once they have validated their local evaluation instruments. College-wide improvement of teaching will occur through such do-it-yourself efforts and only decision science faculty are technically qualified to lead such efforts.     

Education TEAM-SIZE EFFECTS ON BUSINESS GAME PERFORMANCE AND DECISION-MAKING BEHAVIORS

The effects of various decision-making team sizes in a complex business game were studied. Firm size was associated with nonlinear performance results and decision curves resulting in differential learning outcomes, learning sources, attrition rates, and decisionmaking behaviors. A three-member format produced the highest learning levels while two-member firms experienced only marginally significant knowledge increases. Single-member firms experienced the most bankruptcies and dropouts. A contingency view of gaming effectiveness is suggested.