Decision Theory Applied to a Linear Panel Data Model

This paper applies some general concepts in decision theory to a linear panel data model. A simple version of the model is an autoregression with a separate intercept for each unit in the cross section, with errors that are independent and identically distributed with a normal distribution. There is a parameter of interest γ and a nuisance parameter τ, a N×K matrix, where N is the cross‐section sample size. The focus is on dealing with the incidental parameters problem created by a potentially high‐dimension nuisance parameter. We adopt a “fixed‐effects” approach that seeks to protect against any sequence of incidental parameters. We transform τ to (δ, ρ, ω), where δ is a J×K matrix of coefficients from the least‐squares projection of τ on a N×J matrix x of strictly exogenous variables, ρ is a K×K symmetric, positive semidefinite matrix obtained from the residual sums of squares and cross‐products in the projection of τ on x, and ω is a (N−J) ×K matrix whose columns are orthogonal and have unit length. The model is invariant under the actions of a group on the sample space and the parameter space, and we find a maximal invariant statistic. The distribution of the maximal invariant statistic does not depend upon ω. There is a unique invariant distribution for ω. We use this invariant distribution as a prior distribution to obtain an integrated likelihood function. It depends upon the observation only through the maximal invariant statistic. We use the maximal invariant statistic to construct a marginal likelihood function, so we can eliminate ω by integration with respect to the invariant prior distribution or by working with the marginal likelihood function. The two approaches coincide. Decision rules based on the invariant distribution for ω have a minimax property. Given a loss function that does not depend upon ω and given a prior distribution for (γ, δ, ρ), we show how to minimize the average—with respect to the prior distribution for (γ, δ, ρ)—of the maximum risk, where the maximum is with respect to ω. There is a family of prior distributions for (δ, ρ) that leads to a simple closed form for the integrated likelihood function. This integrated likelihood function coincides with the likelihood function for a normal, correlated random‐effects model. Under random sampling, the corresponding quasi maximum likelihood estimator is consistent for γ as N→∞, with a standard limiting distribution. The limit results do not require normality or homoskedasticity (conditional on x) assumptions.     

基于随机Petri网的生产提前期牛鞭效应测度研究

利用随机Petri网结合三角模糊参数,对产品生产的三工艺阶段生产周期的波动进行测定,得出前工艺阶段生产周期的波动造成后工艺阶段生产周期更大的波动,且波动逐级传递。证实了生产提前期也具有类似供应链中的牛鞭效应的现象,对不确定因素导致生产周期波动的测度提供了一种新的思路和方法。     

Asymptotic distributions in affiliation networks with an increasing sequence

A central limit theorem for a linear combination of all the maximum likelihood estimators with an increasing dimension for affiliation networks has been established. Simulation studies are provided to illustrate the asymptotic results.     

A quantile-based study on ageing intensity function

Jiang, Ji, and Xiao (2003 Jiang, R., P. Ji, and X. Xiao. 2003. Aging property of unimodal failure rate models. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 79(1):113–6.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) has introduced a quantitative measure known as the ageing intensity function for evaluating the ageing properties of a component/system. In recent years, there has been a great interest on the study of quantile function, an equivalent alternative to the distribution function approach. Unlike the distribution function approach, the quantile method possess some unique properties (see Gilchrist 2000 Gilchrist, W. 2000. Statistical modelling with quantile functions. Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman and Hall/CRC.[Crossref] , [Google Scholar], Nair, Sankaran, and Balakrishnan 2013 Nair N. U., P. G. Sankaran, N. Balakrishnan. 2013. Quantile-based reliability concepts. In: Quantile-Based Reliability Analysis. Statistics for Industry and Technology. New York, NY: Birkhäuser.[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]). Motivated with this, in the present paper we introduce a quantile-based ageing intensity function and study its various ageing properties. We also study some stochastic comparison of random variables based on the proposed measure.     

A general class of non parametric tests for comparing scale parameters

In this paper, a general class of non parametric tests is proposed for the two-sample scale problem. Testing of the scale parameter is very useful in real-life situations commonly faced in engineering, trade, cultivation, industries, medicine, etc. In all these fields, one will prefer the method that gives more consistent results. Thus, it is worthwhile to test the equality of scale parameters. The distribution of the proposed test is established. To assess the performance of the proposed test, the asymptotic efficacies are studied for some underlying distributions and the results are interpreted with useful information. To see the working of the proposed test, an illustrative example for the real-life data set is provided. The simulation study is also carried out to find the asymptotic power of the proposed test. An extension of the general class of tests to the multiple-sample problem is also discussed.     

SABR随机波动率LIBOR市场模型的参数校准估计方法与实证模拟

针对标准化Libor市场模型（LMM）和Heston随机波动率Libor市场模型（Heston-LMM）的应用局限,首先将SABR代替Heston过程引入标准化Libor市场模型框架,建立非标准化的SABR随机波动率Libor市场模型（SABR-LMM）;在此基础上,运用利率上限期权（Cap）、利率互换期权（Swaption）和自适应马尔科夫链蒙特卡罗模拟方法（MCMC）对模型参数进行有效市场校准与模拟估计;最后,针对三个月美元Libor远期利率实际数据,对上述三类Libor市场模型的实际运行效果进行了实证模拟计算与比较分析。研究结论认为,基于模拟利差计算结果,针对短期Libor利率模拟而言,与LMM和Heston -LMM两类模型而言,加入SABR波动项的SABR-LMM模型具有更小的模拟误差,因而具有更好的模拟效果。     

Approximate jackknife empirical likelihood method for estimating equations

It is known that the profile empirical likelihood method based on estimating equations is computationally intensive when the number of nuisance parameters is large. Recently, Li, Peng, & Qi (2011) proposed a jackknife empirical likelihood method for constructing confidence regions for the parameters of interest by estimating the nuisance parameters separately. However, when the estimators for the nuisance parameters have no explicit formula, the computation of the jackknife empirical likelihood method is still intensive. In this paper, an approximate jackknife empirical likelihood method is proposed to reduce the computation in the jackknife empirical likelihood method when the nuisance parameters cannot be estimated explicitly. A simulation study confirms the advantage of the new method. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 40: 110–123; 2012 © 2012 Statistical Society of Canada     

Three New Life Distribution Models for Modeling Field Failure Data

Intrinsic and extrinsic factors affect the field reliability of a product. This makes the field reliability generally different from the inherent reliability. It is desired that a field reliability model can provide the information about the inherent reliability and quantify the effects of main extrinsic factors on reliability. This article presents three such life distribution models that can quantitatively reflect the effect of tests, transport and storage process, or/and operating variability on reliability. A real-world example is included to illustrate the appropriateness and usefulness of these models. The significance and interpretation of the felid reliability model are also discussed.