我国土地征收权滥用的法律探析

土地征收权合法性的核心要件在于公共利益目的、正当法律程序和公平合理的补偿。结合我国人多地少的国情,有必要对公共利益采取列举式的立法体例进行严格界定,同时引入"公共产品"的概念,淡化地方政府在征地过程中的"经济人"角色,将土地被征收后的增值部分完全分配给失地农民。     

若干国家和地区对知识产权滥用的反垄断控制

为防止知识产权的滥用,一些国家和地区采取了包括反垄断法在内的控制措施。其中,美国司法部和联邦贸易委员会于1995年联合发布的《知识产权许可的反托拉斯指南》、欧共体委员会于1996年颁布的《技术转让规章》、日本公正交易委员会1999年重新颁布的《专利和技术秘密许可协议中的反垄断法指导方针》等颇具代表性,反映了国际上的最新发展趋势。对知识产权滥用的反垄断控制是反垄断法的一项重要任务,是我国面临的一个重要问题,我国有必要借鉴有关经验建立对知识产权滥用的反垄断控制法律制度。     

跨国公司知识产权滥用的法律规制——反垄断法律体系的视野

任何权利都有被滥用的可能性。由于知识产权具有垄断性特征,知识产权被滥用难以避免。当知识产权法律体系对跨国公司滥用知识产权行为的规制难以达到预期效果时,以垄断行为为规制对象的《反垄断法》的出台就显得极为必要。我国反垄断法出台之后,尚存在理论偏差及操作性弱等不足,因此应当借鉴发达国家的经验、做法及国际条约的相关规定,完善我国对跨国公司知识产权滥用的反垄断法律规制体系。     

知识产权滥用问题研究综述

知识产权制度创设的目的是促进科技的发展,针对现在已经出现的一些不利于世界经济发展的知识产权滥用现象,许多学者作了研究,主要集中于知识产权滥用的概念、表现及影响、原因和问题的解决等方面。知识产权滥用问题的根本解决需要对知识产权制度进行反思。     

新企业会计准则下的上市公司盈余管理研究

通过对适当盈余管理和盈余管理滥用进行阐述,并列举了滥用盈余管理的一般手段,着重分析了新会计准则对上市公司盈余管理产生的重要影响,旨在新会计环境下,对盈余管理形成正确认识,提高广大投资者识别不正当盈余管理的能力,以便进行正确决策。     

先秦的“法治”思想和实践考量

先秦法家在与儒家“礼治”的争论中提出“法治”思想,并与战国时期富国强兵的国家策略结合,变法图存的“法治”实践此起彼伏。其中最为成功的是秦国的商鞅变法,秦国由此迅速崛起并最终吞并六国,建立起统一的封建国家。秦帝国的建立是“法治”思想和实践的里程碑,大秦将集权专制和“法治”相互糅合,将法家重刑思想发展到极端,走向了崇尚暴力和滥刑滥杀的野蛮恐怖境地,导致天下怨叛,秦王朝二世而亡,君权至上最终将法治引向了集权专制的死胡同。     

Exploring Shame,Guilt, and Risky Substance Use Among Sexual Minority Men and Women

This study examined the interrelations among shame-proneness, guilt-proneness, internalized heterosexism (IH), and problematic substance use among 389 gay, lesbian, and bisexual men and women. Problematic alcohol and drug use were positively related to shame-proneness and negatively related to guilt-proneness. Bisexuals reported riskier substance use behaviors, lower levels of guilt-proneness, and higher levels of IH than gay men and lesbians. Furthermore, study findings indicated that shame and IH are related. Additional investigations of these associations would supplement current understandings of sexual minority stress and advance the development of substance-related intervention and prevention efforts targeting sexual minorities.     

The Prosecution's Use of Social Science Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

Six different categories of social science expert testimony presented by the prosecution regarding behaviors of child sexual abuse victims are described and analyzed in relation to national case law trends. Problems with the admissibility of several forms of such testimony are discussed in terms of legal requirements for expert testimony, prior knowledge of the issues held by jurors, reliability of the social science research regarding child sexual abuse, and the prejudicial impact on jurors. Finally, recommendations are made to limit the use of most forms of testimony (except rehabilitative testimony), conduct further research on certain issues, and convene a multi-disciplinary symposium and publish, in a reputable journal, papers from the symposium that analyze the issues, explore areas of consensus, and suggest future directions in this area.     

Ending Sexual Harassment: Protecting the Progress of #MeToo

ABSTRACT

How can we best protect and safeguard the progress of the #MeToo movement? This article presents 11 reforms designed to ensure the movement’s drive toward justice. These fall into three areas. The first concern process reforms designed to (a) protect all those involved—accusers and the accused—in investigations of sexual harassment, (b) end differential treatment of those found guilty, and (c) ensure punishments are commensurate with the crime and proportional in terms of other transgressors. The second set of reforms focus on transparency of the process, including clarifying (a) how to file charges, (b) who makes decisions, (c) relevant public information on how charges and procedures are followed, (d) what transgressions result in which punishments, and (e) how complaints are investigated to protect the rights and privacy of all. Finally, I address cultural issues that address (a) our portrayal of women, (b) our societal attempts to prepare young people so they can better protect themselves, and (c) attempts to encourage bystanders to intervene in the face of sexual harassment of others.     

Legal Marriage,Unequal Recognition,and Mental Health Among Same‐Sex Couples

The authors examined whether the perception of unequal relationship recognition ‐ a novel couple‐level minority stressor ‐ has negative consequences for mental health among same‐sex couples. Data were analyzed from a dyadic study of 100 same‐sex couples (200 individuals) in the United States. Being in a legal marriage was associated with lower perceived unequal recognition and better mental health; being in a registered domestic partnership or civil union—but not also legally married—was associated with greater perceived unequal recognition and worse mental health. Actor partner interdependence models tested associations between legal relationship status, unequal relationship recognition, and mental health (nonspecific psychological distress, depressive symptomatology, and problematic drinking), net controls (age, gender, race and ethnicity, education, and income). Unequal recognition was consistently associated with worse mental health, independent of legal relationship status. Legal changes affecting relationship recognition should not be seen as simple remedies for addressing the mental health effects of institutionalized discrimination.