新农村建设中地域性景观的营造

在社会主义新农村建设的实践中,为了提高乡村生活水平、保护地域文化及乡村生态景观,将"多元主义"设计思想应用到营造地域性景观的过程中,可创造出一个既有现代都市气息又不失乡村特色、地域特征及传统文化的新农村景观.     

福利三角结构视野下的中国法律援助制度

我国当前法律援助的主要矛盾是有限的法律援助资源与大量的法律援助需求之间存着在巨大差距。而关于法律援助的研究多从法学角度作出,法律援助可以体现司法公正和人权保障,法律援助是国家的责任;在实践中,非政府组织在法律援助中发挥的作用越来越大,但相应的研究却较少。借用社会政策研究中的福利三角范式,可以探讨政府、市场和非政府组织在提供法律援助方面的作用以及三者的冲突与协调,以求最终实现福利和谐。     

多元化视角下恢复性司法的理论基础

作为西方刑事法学界研究"显学"的恢复性司法,在多元化视角下,其理论基础包括四个方面:哲学基础是后现代主义哲学;社会基础是市民社会理念及国家与社会良性互动理论;理念基础是恢复性正义理念、利益平衡理念以及参与制民主理念;法学基础则是重新融合性耻辱理论、社区司法理论、犯罪被害人学理论以及犯罪标签理论。     

流浪儿童救助模式转型的创新路径——基于优势视角理论的探讨

我国儿童福利发展正在由补缺型向适度普惠型转变,这对流浪儿童救助模式的转型与创新提出了挑战。通过优势视角理论对近10年流浪儿童救助困境进行深入分析,提出从构建现代流浪儿童福利政策体系、救助机构功能重新定位、建立社会工作制度、明确四维流浪儿童福利责任与服务主体体系几个方面推动流浪儿童救助模式的转型创新。     

Estimating the Effects of a Time‐Limited Earnings Subsidy for Welfare‐Leavers

In the Self Sufficiency Project (SSP) welfare demonstration, members of a randomly assigned treatment group could receive a subsidy for full‐time work. The subsidy was available for 3 years, but only to people who began working full time within 12 months of random assignment. A simple optimizing model suggests that the eligibility rules created an “establishment” incentive to find a job and leave welfare within a year of random assignment, and an “entitlement” incentive to choose work over welfare once eligibility was established. Building on this insight, we develop an econometric model of welfare participation that allows us to separate the two effects and estimate the impact of the earnings subsidy on welfare entry and exit rates among those who achieved eligibility. The combination of the two incentives explains the time profile of the experimental impacts, which peaked 15 months after random assignment and faded relatively quickly. Our findings suggest that about half of the peak impact of SSP was attributable to the establishment incentive. Despite the extra work effort generated by SSP, the program had no lasting impact on wages and little or no long‐run effect on welfare participation.     

真之多元论与真之符合论——两种符合多元论之比较

“真”具有不同的涵义或真具有不同的性质已经成为一个公认的事实，由此产生真之多元论。然而，逻辑推理的“保真性”要求“真”具有单义性。如何使真概念的单义性和真性质的多元性相协调？对这一问题的探索导致向真之符合论的回归，其结果便是真之符合多元论的出现。笔者也持某种符合多元论的观点，其要点是：由“符合”的单义性来保证“真”的单义性，而“符合”的单义性是以外延等同论和内在符合论为基础的；单义的“符合”概念与多重实现的“存在”功能结合起来，达到真之一元论与真之多元论的统一。     

Foxes who want to be hedgehogs: Is ethical pluralism possible in psychology's replication crisis?

In this article, we draw attention to public-private dilemmas among psychologists that make sense of the debates around the replication crisis, citation practices and networking practices. We argue that the values of justice and caring map onto the public sphere and private sphere respectively and create the horns of a dilemma for academics. While bureaucratic justice is a publicly revered value of modernity in psychological research that underpins ethics, validity, reliability and equality of opportunity, ‘caring’ is a more subtle value of traditionalism that runs in parallel and is detected only by our psychological practices. In particular, we argue that it is detected by practices such as disputes between the replicated and their replicators in replication studies (understood as a dramatic counter reality) as to who is more ‘careless’ with procedure; citation (including the self-care of self-citation) as thanksgiving and incantation of powerful others in enchantment rituals, and the system of professional indebtedness that accrues in ‘kinship’ networks – where kinship is understood broadly as adoption into a research group and its network. The clashes between these values can lead to a sense of hypocrisy and irony in academic life, as incommensurate values split between private and public expression. From this position, we delve into Isaiah Berlin's work on incommensurate values to suggest that ethical pluralism, involving more public recognition of the equal but different ethical demands of these values can help overcome these everyday dilemmas in the public sphere.