新见黄遵宪、丁日昌集外诗及考订

本文公布了新近发现的晚清政治家、诗人黄遵宪、丁日昌集外佚诗,包括黄遵宪七律二首,丁日昌七律二十首,并对有关史实进行了考订辨析,提供了新的文献资料。     

馆藏文献的现状与发展

从馆藏文献的现状入手，基于文献载体和服务手段面临巨大变革的事实，探讨了馆藏文献中“传统”馆藏与“虚拟”馆藏的比例构成及其发展趋势     

高长虹两部诗集解读

高长虹曾经是个颇有影响的诗人,但多年来一直被冷落和忘却.解读他二十年代写作的两本诗集,可透视那时代高长虹的个性追求和情感经历,也可以看出他诗歌创作的长短得失.由此,可确定高长虹应有的历史位置.     

论中国的“日本词”研究

文章对中国学者关于日本词的研究作了系统评述。论文共分三部分。第一部分论夏承焘先生对日本词的关注与评述;第二部分论中国词学家对日本词的评价;第三部分对中国的三部涉及日本词的选本即《域外词选》、《日本词选》、《日本三家词笺注》分别作了论述。     

传世《孝经》郑注的再考察

郑玄与传世本《孝经郑注》的关系,自魏晋以后一直是个谜。由于汉末经注的影响力,人们见有题名郑注的经书自然以为是郑玄之注,经学里的行家人早就从具体内容中发现了疑点,屡次提出。但由于政治家对到底是不是郑玄作的注并不太在意,故此事一直未能澄清,直到唐代,依然是笔糊涂账。在学界争论不休时,唐玄宗以天子之尊,亲自注《孝经》。自此,《孝经》唐明皇御注本就成了定本,这更促使了民间真的郑注本的散失。宋以后的《孝经》注疏本也是在唐明皇注本基础上为之。清代学者辑出的多种《孝经郑注》本,也都以传世《孝经正义》为主要依据。其实,这些郑注根本就不是郑玄的作品。     

Managing a Comprehensive Cost-per-Use Project in a Large Academic Library

Abstract

This article reports the findings of a study to evaluate title-level cost per use (CPU) for most recurring resources at The University of Alabama Libraries. The study relied on cost and usage data from FY2016. The purpose of the project was to identify titles for cancellation and to establish CPU for most titles ordered individually and those within packages for use in future contract negotiations. The analysis began with a list of all recurring titles having a cost of $1,000 or more. The review involved 1,035 titles with an initial objective to highlight all titles with a CPU of $200 or more. Titles exceeding this CPU threshold received additional review, with several identified for cancellation. This article presents the findings and provides an overview of the process used to collect CPU on a large scale. The article outlines some of the challenges faced by libraries when trying to align data that are stored in various silos and the limitations for various platforms and software used when collecting CPU data. The findings from this study formed the basis for a LibGuide developed and used to raise awareness of the need for cancellations. The data also assisted with future contract negotiations.