福建建设生态强省的战略思考与若干对策

分析了实现持续发展所面临的巨大挑战与压力。结合福建省实际 ,提出建设生态强省的内涵与意义 ,并较为系统地阐述了发展思路与若干对策     

生态文艺学:视域、范式与文本

“生态文艺学”作为一门新兴文艺学科 ,由于学者们所存在的视域差异及遵循的学术范式不同 ,其预构的文本存在着很多可写的形式 ,这本在人们的意料之中。然而 ,从学科的发展来看 ,这种状态毕竟是一种不利因素 ,我们应该对之进行必要的检视 ,使它朝着理想的文本模式发展     

新世纪宁波市城市建设的若干思考

文章对杭州湾跨海大桥建设对宁波影响、宁波与上海关系、新区建设与老城保护、宁波平原生态环境评价、城市特色塑造等今后城市发展的关键性问题提出了一些看法。     

藏族传统文化对青藏高原地理环境的解说

在藏族传统文化中 ,青藏高原藏族居住区域被命名为“神圣雪域”。藏族通过想象、语言、神话及象征符号将地理上的高原解释为“人类学的高原” ,使之成为神圣化的精神家园。因而 ,藏族传统文化中的青藏高原自然面貌与人文景观和谐地组合为一体 ,成为相互依存的完美整体。神圣生敬畏 ,敬畏生珍爱。对高原家乡神圣化的功能作用是珍爱保护它 ,是藏族人保护高原环境、美化家园的一种崇高愿望。通过自然禁忌行为和规范加强了对高原生态环境的保护     

人才生态环境建构研究

人才成长、培养和使用的环境是否和谐,是否有利于人才的发展和转化,直接决定人才成长的速度、人才培养的质量和人才使用的价值。人才生态环境系统是一个可持续发展的能量交换体,人才在其中能够与人才群体、人才组织、人才社会各生态要素相互联系、相互影响和相互作用,以至形成综合的具有核心竞争能力的生态系统,最终促使人才自我价值的实现,从而有效提升人才的使用价值和社会价值。     

城市发展的可持续性测评初探

城市发展是否是可持续的已成为人们关注的焦点,如何测度与评价城市发展的可持续性尚无统一的认识。文章设计了一个评价城市可持续发展的框架,借助于常用统计数据,并利用应用统计学方法筛选出一个由17个指标构成的测评指标体系,运用层次分析法确定权重,并以天津市为实证案例,测度并评价其1990—1999年这10年间发展的可持续性。     

生态环境建设与渭河污染治理研究

据渭河流经陕西区域经济社会发展状况及渭河水质现状，通过国家地表水环境质量标准与有关工业、生活污水管理排放标准比较分析，提出在加强监督管理和污染治理的同时更应重视渭河流域生态环及环境建设与保护在渭河污染治理、恢复其应有功能所起到的重要作用。     

生态伦理观与法律本位

生态伦理观主张将人类道德关怀和调节的范围从人与人的关系扩大到人与动植物、人与自然的关系。受其影响,有学者提出法律本位应当向生态本位转变的观点。在分析法律生态本位观念可能造成的一些不良影响及其具体实施的不可行性和不现实性后,提出应当继续倡扬法律的社会权利本位观念,并吸纳生态伦理观的合理成分,加大对生态环境的保护力度,以实现人的全面发展和人与自然的和谐。     

地市级党报发展史上的新闻传奇——媒介生态学视野下全国第一张渔业报《舟山报》的由来及其影响

1956年，《舟山报》改办为全国第一张渔业报，这是“双百”方针指导下地方报纸新闻改革成功的鲜活典型。今天，从媒介生态学的角度，分析促使当年《舟山报》改办成功的内外生态因子，对于地市报刊准确把握媒介生态位，办出地方特色，具有重要意义。     

Ecocultural Attributes: Evaluating Ecological Degradation in Terms of Ecological Goods and Services Versus Subsistence and Tribal Values

It is becoming increasingly clear that scientists, managers, lawyers, public policymakers, and the public must decide how to value what is provided by, and is a consequence of, natural resources. While “Western” scientists have clear definitions for the goods and services that ecosystems provide, we contend that these categories do not encompass the full totality of the values provided by natural resources. Partly the confusion results from a limited view of natural resources derived from the need to monetize the value of ecosystems and their component parts. Partly it derives from the “Western” way of separating natural resources from cultural resources or values, and partly it derives from the false dichotomy of assuming that ecosystems are natural, and anything constructed by man is not natural. In this article, we explore the previous assumptions, and suggest that because cultural resources often derive from, and indeed require, intact and unspoiled natural ecosystems or settings, that these values are rightly part of natural resources. The distinction is not trivial because of the current emphasis on cleaning up chemically and radiologically contaminated sites, on restoration of damaged ecosystems, on natural resource damage assessments, and on long‐term stewardship goals. All of these processes depend upon defining natural resources appropriately. Several laws, regulations, and protocols depend upon natural resource trustees to protect natural resources on trust lands, which could lead to the circular definition that natural resources are those resources that the trustees feel they are responsible for. Where subsistence or tribal peoples are involved, the definition of natural resources should be broadened to include those ecocultural attributes that are dependent upon, and have incorporated, natural resources. For example, a traditional hunting and fishing ground is less valued by subsistence peoples if it is despoiled by contamination or physical ecosystem degradation; an Indian sacred ground is tarnished if the surrounding natural environment is degraded; a traditional homeland is less valued if the land itself is contaminated. Our argument is that intact natural resources are essential elements of many cultural resources, and this aspect requires and demands adequate consideration (and may therefore require compensation).