20世纪五六十年代中苏大论战的原因分析

意识形态的分歧是中苏论战的深层根源,国家利益的冲突是引发论战最重要的内在原因。另外,中苏之间民族传统的差异及其影响下的个人因素无疑也起到了重大作用,再加上其它多种因素的综合作用,最终引发了激烈的中苏大论战。     

始终坚持和巩固马克思主义的指导地位——论社会主义意识形态建设的基本规律

坚持和巩固马克思主义的指导地位是贯穿于社会主义意识形态建设全过程并起主导作用的基本规律。掌握并自觉运用社会主义意识形态建设的基本规律,始终坚持和巩固马克思主义的指导地位,一要深刻理解马克思主义指导地位的历史必然性;二要从理论和实践层面上回答坚持和巩固马克思主义指导地位的必要性;三是大力发展社会主义经济、政治和文化,实现马克思主义的与时俱进,加强和创新思想政治教育工作,重建马克思主义话语权。     

马克思和谐社会思想及当代价值

构建和谐社会是马克思恩格斯关于未来社会构想中的一个基本价值取向.笔者在重温马克思恩格斯一系列重要著作基础上,认真解读其和谐社会思想,包括人与自然的和谐、人与人的和谐、人与社会的和谐以及只有共产主义才能实现人类社会的和谐.这些重要思想为我们提供了科学的理论依据,对我们构建社会主义和谐社会的伟大实践具有纲领性的指导意义.     

国际化背景下中共反和平演变意识的形成——中国共产党反和平演变历史溯源

二战以后,美苏由盟友转变为战略对手。在欧洲,美苏之间的前沿阵地是在德国,在亚洲,主要围绕中国而展开。美国在中国实行的扶蒋反共战略以及苏联对中国共产党的支持,导致了两种意识形态在中国的对立。中国共产党在建国前后,反和平演变意识形态逐步形成并进行了大规模的宣传与教育活动。这种意识形态是在国际化意识形态对立下的大背景下形成的。     

论“国际社会”的意识形态性——兼论我国国际话语权的提升

作为国际政治领域的重要概念,“国际社会”具有两面性。从表面上看,“国际社会”是国际行为体之间开展合作的场域,应建构和维护国际秩序的公平正义,因而在国际交往中不应以意识形态为标准和以意识形态划线;从本质上看,“国际社会”是国际行为体开展国家利益和意识形态博弈的重要场域,具有强烈的意识形态性。“国际社会”意识形态性的关键是国际话语权,其实质是国家(或国际社会成员)的国际利益。从意识形态的角度考察“国际社会”,有利于看清“国际社会”的本质,这对于深入理解国际热点问题和国际舆论的实质,特别是对于我国国际话语权的建设与提升,具有重要意义。     

揭橥理论视域：“国进民退”争论背后的意识形态迷思

“国进民退”争议热潮背后隐藏的是以前困扰着部分中国共产党人,至今仍然困扰着部分共产党人的意识形态认知误区,回顾中国共产党宏观经济政策史和经济思想史的变迁历程,深入剖析中国共产党在意识形态层面上对“公有”和“非公有”经济成分的内在二元冲突,可以见出中国共产党要以“执政党”的自身定位来重构“革命党”时期的意识形态。     

马克思主义意识形态在我国法治建设中的作用

法治总与一定社会的政治、经济、文化紧密相连,它不能脱离社会生活条件而抽象存在。法的关系正像国家的形式一样,既不能从它们本身去理解,也不能从所谓人类精神的一般发展来理解,相反,它们根源于物质的生活关系。按照历史唯物主义的观点,我国的法治建设是建立在我国的社会主义经济基础之上的,我国的法治建设遵循马克思主义有关上层建筑是经济基础反映的客观规律;而马克思主义意识形态是以历史唯物主义为世界观基础,反映无产阶级的根本经济政治利益的、自觉的、系统化的思想观念体系,是对当前我国基本国情的科学反映。那么,马克思主义意识形态与我国的法治建设二者有没有关系呢？如果有,那它们之间是什么关系呢？试图通过论证马克思主义意识形态在我国法治建设中的作用,以期客观地揭示二者的关系。     

One week in October: Luis Suárez,John Terry and the turn to racial neoliberalism in English men’s professional football

This article explores two significant incidents of racism – involving Luis Suárez and John Terry – from the 2011–2012 English Premier League football season. In particular, it analyses and contextualises the reactions and responses articulated by key stakeholders within the football industry. Discursive themes were employed by these individuals as a means of trying to mitigate and/or exonerate the actions of Suárez and Terry, to question the veracity of the allegations made against them, and to downplay the extent and effects of racism in English football more generally. The article situates these standpoints within the wider cultural politics of race in the game and extricates the connections between discourse and structure in manifestations of racism. It demonstrates that these dominant responses are indicative of colour-blind ideology, white racial framing and the rules of racial standing. It also argues that these sporting trends are part of a wider societal shift towards racial neoliberalism.     

Narratives from the neighbourhood: The discursive construction of integration problems in talkback radio1

This paper examines how speakers deploy narrative devices in talking about Sudanese refugees. Particularly, we show how narrative constructions form an important basis for the advancement of accounts about integration problems into the local polity. We analyse talkback ‘phone‐in’ calls to a local Adelaide radio station that provide callers an opportunity to give accounts of events and social phenomena that concern them in their local settings. Analysis shows that speakers regularly deployed narrative constructions, first‐hand ‘witnessing’ devices that functioned to legitimate accounts as veridical versions of events, and contrast devices to explicate the moral and behavioural aberrance of Sudanese refugees. The analysis illustrates how these discursive devices function rhetorically in interaction, in ways that differentiate Sudanese refugees as problematic. Through this analysis, we contend that narrative devices precipitate and bolster socio‐political policies that have serious, negative consequences for Sudanese refugees.     

Vowel harmony redux: Correct sounds,English loan words,and the sociocultural life of a phonological structure in Korean1

This paper examines an ideology of standard pronunciation and spelling of English loan words in South Korea through the lens of Korean vowel harmony. I focus specifically on the alternation between an older Japanese‐style ‘a’[a] and a newer Korean‐style ‘?’[?] for the mapping of mid‐vowels from English to Korean. The opposition between ‘a’ and ‘?’ also figures into the dichotomy of vowel classes between ‘yang’ or ‘light’ vowels and ‘yin’ or ‘dark’ vowels in Korean vowel harmony. This opposition is pervasive in Korean's rich stock of denotationally iconic words (e.g. onomatopoeia), where ablaut between vowel classes produces semantic and pragmatic contrasts. I suggest that this latter structure of phonological opposition has an influence on speakers’ perceptions of vowel difference and associated values in English loan words, despite an overarching ideology of standard pronunciation that is based on assumptions about phonetic fidelity. ? ??? ?? ???? ?? ?? ? ??? ? ?????? ????? ?? ??? ???? ????. ??, ?? ???? ‘?’[a]? ‘?’[?]? ??(mapping)?? ?? ??? ??. ??? ?? ????? ‘?’? ?? ?? ??? ? ?????? ???? ???? ??(正音)?? ?????? ??. ?? ‘?’? ????? ???, ??? ???? ??? ????? ?(音)?? ???? ??. ???, ‘?’/‘?’? ??? ??? ???? ?? ????? ????? ??; ?, ??? ????? ????? ??? ??. ??, ????? ???? ????? ??? ??? ??? ? ? ??. ????, ????? ????? ????? ??? ?? ???? ????? ??? ??? ???. [Korean]