基于SECI模型的高校教学团队构建策略

教学团队建设是提高高校教学质量的关键因素。分析了教学团队的含义及运行机制,并对知识创造的SECI模型在高校教学团队的知识创造过程中进行解读;进而从知识管理的角度提出构建高校教学团队的策略:构建团队知识共享和创造的场、构建教学团队知识管理平台以及建立团队合作的愿景和文化。     

对恽代英早期哲学思想的探讨

较为系统地阐述了恽代英早期的哲学思想。恽代英提出的“物质实在论”有力地批判了哲学史上形形色色的错误观点 ,对哲学基本问题作了唯物主义的回答 :他提出的唯物主义认识论的思想 ,批判了“不可知论”;对“无神论”和“有神论”的斗争 ,作了富有成效的论述 ,是新文化运动的重要内容。他从一个侧面推动了当时思想文化运动的发展 ,为以后成为马克思主义者奠定了基础     

论高校图书馆读者弱势群体知识援助体系构建

确立高校图书馆读者群体中的弱势读者群体范围,实证分析高校图书馆服务的弱势群体与一般意义中弱势群体含义的异同,进而分析现有高校图书馆对弱势群体的知识援助体系建设现状,最终为构建新型高校图书馆弱势群体知识援助体系充实新的理论内涵。     

国际学术话语权研究进展及其启示

学术话语权作为实现“文化强国”的重要组成部分,是衡量其综合国力和文化软实力强弱的重要尺度,受到世界各国的高度重视。欧美发达国家相继提出的“话语权力理论”“文化领导权理论”,以及西方文化霸权理论一直主导着世界话语权的发展。近年来,国内对“学术话语权缺失”“学术话语体系构建”“学术话语权提升策略”等主题进行了广泛的探讨。学术话语权是学术话语体系建设的关键要素所在,学术话语权作为软实力对社会发展及学术繁荣的实际影响和作用异常深远;探寻国际学术话语权的研究现状及启示,可为我国构建学术话语权的科学评价理论、方法和应用体系提供有益参考和借鉴。为此,本文选取Web of Science核心合集数据库中的相关研究成果,通过Citespace软件对国际学术话语权的国别进行统计和分析,再用Vosviewer软件对国际学术话语权文献进行热点主题分析,再采用文献计量分析方法对相关研究文献的研究进展进行全面分析和总结。结果表明,国际学术话语权研究的热点主题主要集中在学术话语与语言学的相关理论研究、跨文化跨语言跨学科学术话语研究、学术话语在政治话语权、身份认定及社会化中的作用、学术话语评价与计量研究等4个方面,通...     

知识经济时代大学生面临的挑战

知识经济是以知识和信息为基础的经济,随着知识经济的逐步兴起,社会经济发展已呈现出一系列新的特点。在知识经济时代,大学生首先面对的是知识经济的挑战。具体来说,有以下几个方面:转变思维方式;开发自身潜能;培养人文精神;树立忧患意识。     

Still Searching for Excellence? International Accounting and the World's Most Outstanding Companies

This paper measures the effect of accounting policy choices in the context of Davis, Flanders and Star's (DFS) (1991) league table of the world's most outstanding companies. Our study is an investigation of the robustness of the research underlying Kay (1993). The sensitivity of the rankings to the three major conventions that are used in calculating added value are examined: depreciation policy, the estimation of the cost of capital inputs and consistency of international generally accepted accounting principles. The key finding is that the degree of disruption caused by international accounting differences is likely to be the most material. It is equivalent, in this study, to a 60% increase in the cost of capital or an 80% change in the depreciation lives of fixed assets. After adjusting towards consistent international accounting, we now find that four Japanese companies appear in the top ten. Before adjustment there were none.     

知识型组织模式探讨

本文在简略阐述传统严格等级制组织模式已不适应知识经济时代组织竞争需要的基础上,提出了以知识网络化和人的知识创新为核心的新型管理模式:知识型团队组织。并进一步阐释了和形成和保证团队组织实现其工作目标和知识增长的四个原则:公正对待、共同目标、组织内或团队内的规则、程序及有形接触。     

知识经济对财务管理的影响

知识经济的兴起对财务管理带来诸多影响 ,要求对建立在传统经济基础之上的财务管理模式加以改革。要树立知识化理财观念、人本化理财观念、风险理财观念和信息理财观念等新观念 ;在财务管理的内容方面也将有新的调整 ,比如无形资产的内容将极大丰富 ,无形资产的计量将以产出价值为基础 ,风险管理将成为企业财务管理的一项重要内容 ,还要改变现行的财务评价指标体系等 ,以适应知识经济对财务管理的要求。     

Social media and Web 2.0 for knowledge sharing in product design

Working collaboratively with internal and external partners (suppliers, customers and internal stakeholders) has been at the epicentre of product design. Knowledge sharing has been well recognised in this context. However, there is limited research that has addressed the role of social media/Web 2.0 in facilitating knowledge sharing for sense- and decision-making within product design. To address this gap, this study draws on the resource-based view (RBV) of the firm and two vignettes that relate to ‘collaborative co-design’ and ‘collaborative design-to-order’. We illustrate the role of social media/Web 2.0 in building knowledge sharing capabilities for sense- and decision-making for internal and external partners during product design. Limitations and further research into the use of social media/Web 2.0 are also discussed.     

Integrating a Top‐Down and a Bottom‐Up Approach: Formal and Informal Risk‐Handling Strategies in a Utility Company

In this study, we bring together a top‐down and a bottom‐up approach of risk handling. We do so by conceptualizing and qualitatively and quantitatively measuring formal and informal risk‐handling strategies in a Dutch utility company. We conceive of formal risk handling as regulating, training, and educating safety and enforcing rule compliance, while we distinguish three different informal risk‐handling strategies: discretionary specialization, tacit knowledge, and taking personal responsibility. We show that the formal risk‐handling strategy and the three informal risk‐handling strategies can be measured separately. Hence, we have validated the measurement of all four strategies derived from two different risk‐handling approaches. Moreover, we have demonstrated that the perceived use of the four strategies has different effects on unsafe behavior: formal risk handling and tacit knowledge decrease it, discretion increases it, and taking personal responsibility has no effect on unsafe behavior.