亲子关系确认制度的反思与重构——基于婚姻法司法解释（三）的讨论

亲子关系的确认是亲子法的基本问题。在传统法中,它由婚生子女的推定与否认、非婚生子女的认领与准正组成。当代亲子法以子女为本位,对子女不再作＂婚生＂与＂非婚生＂区分。未成年子女最佳利益和兼顾亲子关系真实性与稳定性,成为亲子关系确认的基本原则。统一的亲子关系确认制度由亲子关系的推定、亲子关系的否认、子女的认领构成。婚姻法司法解释应对有关子女否认和认领的实体法规则作出解释。     

Power,authority and legitimacy

Management, human resources, organization, control, leadership, etc., all seem to be just so many euphemisms for power, and this suggests a discourse of management and organization that calls things by their proper name. This paper on the contrary stresses the need to resolve the concept of ‘power’ itself into more differentiated notions, and proposes that clarification may be derived from distinctions once explicit in the vocabulary of Classical antiquity, but lost in modern European languages. It argues that nothing but confusion in thinking about organizations, management and legitimation can result from the failure to recognize that the phenomena this vocabulary identifies and distinguishes are irreducibly different.     

政府合法性价值的自我求证——政府改革的价值观

我国目前正处于“改革过大关”的阶段。我国政府改革之所以困难重重,是因为这种改革在很大程度上是一种对社会危机的被迫反应,改革动力不充分。究其根源,则在于政府改革对自身合法性价值求证的缺失。政府改革需要不断地对自身存在的合法性价值求证进行反思,反思的结果将是政府行政的不断完善和为社会进一步发展作出更大的贡献。     

行政权不得推定与行政权法定的实现

行政权推定行使,已成为行政权越权、滥用的基本口实。本文从权力不得推定出发,阐明了行政权不得推定的理由依据,指出其现象表现。并在此基础上,提出行政权法定,为行政权的行使设定了基本界域。     

Will the EU Disintegrate? What Does the Likely Possibility of Disintegration Tell About the Future of the World?

Is it true that either the EU will be democratised or it will disintegrate? I concur that the current policies, principles, and institutions of the EU both generate counterproductive politico-economic effects and suffer from problems of legitimation. These effects and problems, which are not confined to Europe, give rise to tendencies towards disintegration. My second point concerns the timing of the required learning and reforms. Modest policy proposals and tentative steps within the existing EU Treaty framework may be too little too late. The question is whether there is enough time for deeper transformations in Europe—and also globally.     

Varieties of multi-stakeholder governance: selecting legitimation strategies in transnational sustainability politics

Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) are often referred to as the ‘gold standard’ of private governance. However, existing MSIs vary strongly in their institutional designs and the ways in which they use inclusiveness, procedural fairness and, expert-based strategies to create legitimacy for their rules. This article investigates these institutional choices. It reviews arguments about demand from legitimacy-granting audiences, isomorphic pressures, and the role played by institutional entrepreneurs, and intergroup bargaining. It explores these mechanisms in an empirical investigation of the formation of three MSIs in the field of sustainable agriculture. Its findings advance our understanding of the conditions under which MSIs adhere or depart from normative ideals of democratic governance.     

论我国法院调解制度改革的模式选择

改革完善我国调审合一的诉讼制度,对法院调解制度进行重新构建,必须解决三个主要问题,一是我们需要什么样的调解主体,二是如何看待查明事实、分清是非原则,三是如何保障法院调解的正当性。本文在对此三个问题进行探讨的基础上,提出了多元化的法院调解制度设计。      

海洋社会学学科发展面临的挑战及其突破

作为一门新兴的社会学分支学科,海洋社会学已经形成了自己的科学共同体.而学科范畴的偏离和学科理论的匮乏已经成为制约学科发展的核心因素.关于学科范畴的偏离,需要加强学科意识和学术研究的社会学化.而学科理论建设需要科学共同体走出宏大叙事、走向田野、走向理论演绎.海洋开发提供了海洋社会学与主流社会学的对话平台,其中,海洋开发政策的自下而上考察、海洋开发中的生态破坏、低水平开发和石油泄漏提供了关键性的平台.海洋社会学重在研究海洋开发的社会机制、社会过程与社会后果,同时需要关注文化因素.     

行政指导行为的合法性研究

从我国法文化传统的角度分析行政指导行为的合法性 ,并透过依法行政理念的演进轨迹进一步讨论了这个问题 ,最后结合我国法制现实讨论了行政指导与依法行政的关系 ,指出应正确认识和实施行政指导行为 ,推动行政指导法治化 ,这是我国经济社会发展和行政法制建设的客观要求     

A tainted trade? Moral ambivalence and legitimation work in the private security industry1

The private security industry is often represented - and typically represents itself - as an expanding business, confident of its place in the world and sure of its ability to meet a rising demand for security. But closer inspection of the ways in which industry players talk about its past, present and future suggests that this self-promotion is accompanied by unease about the industry's condition and legitimacy. In this paper, we analyse the self-understandings of those who sell security - as revealed in interviews conducted with key industry players and in a range of trade materials - in order to highlight and dissect the constitutive elements of this ambivalence. This analysis begins by describing the reputational problems that are currently thought to beset the industry and the underlying fears about its status and worth that these difficulties disclose. We then examine how security players seek to legitimate the industry using various narratives of professionalization. Four such narratives are identified - regulation, education, association and borrowing - each of which seeks to justify private security and enhance the industry's social worth. What is striking about these legitimation claims is that they tend not to justify the selling of security in market terms. In conclusion we ask why this is the case and argue that market justifications are 'closed-off' by a moral ambivalence that attaches to an industry trading in products which cannot guarantee to deliver the condition that its consumers crave.