法院调解的效力之维

对程序运作的结果加以利用,赋予民事调解符合基本法理的效力有利于实现调解制度解决纠纷的最终目的。法院调解的效力既源于实体上的私权自治,也源于程序自身的运行过程。法院调解具有有别于判决书的形成力、羁束力和执行力。无论是从必要性根据还是从正当性根据而言,法院调解都不必或不应拥有既判力。对调解的救济由于合意的存在无需保留常规通道,但对实体上的无效或可以撤销以及程序上的严重违法之情形仍需提供特别救济的紧急出口。     

乡村振兴战略下粮食供给面临的困境与出路

扛稳粮食安全重任是实施乡村振兴战略的首要任务,推进粮食产业可持续发展是促进乡村产业兴旺的重要前提。当前粮食供给面临资源环境约束趋紧、种粮效益持续下降、农业劳动力转移、国际竞争力弱、支持保护政策空间有限等突出问题。提高粮食综合生产能力,保障粮食供给,同时注重产量结构与质量效益的全面提升,既是基于国情和发展阶段的必然选择,也是应对复杂多变的国际形势以及在日趋激烈的国际竞争中掌握主动权的必要条件。为细化和落实粮食安全新战略目标,提出构建新型粮食供给体系的思路与具体路径:从保供给向绿色可持续转变;从小而散经营向多种形式的适度规模经营转变;从价补合一向价补分离转变;从注重产量向注重质量效益转变。采取多种措施综合应对,构建更有保障、更高质量、更高效率的粮食供给体系,切实确保粮食安全。     

我国公司司法解散中若干程序问题的思考

我国《公司法》仅在第183条规定了司法解散制度,但内容单薄,规定原则,缺乏应有的可操作性。就程序问题的规定而言,几乎近于空白。司法解散之诉中的合并、法院的强制调解、与清算程序的衔接、起诉主体的扩张等程序问题等均有待补充。     

Social Work and Child-centred Family Court Mediation

Correspondence to Dr Greg Mantle, APU, Ashby House, Floor 2, Brook Street, Chelmsford CM1 1UH, UK. E-mail G.J.Mantle{at}apu.ac.uk Summary In April 2001, the Children and Family Court Advisory SupportService (CAFCASS) became responsible for family court work,including the provision of mediation services. Family courtmediation offers a gateway for social work with children andfamilies whose needs are largely left untouched by current services,and could thereby play an important part within the broaderextension of prevention, early intervention, parenting and supportservices recommended by government. Over the past two decades,mediation has become a popular approach to reducing conflictand resolving disputes in a wide range of inter-personal, communityand organizational settings. Given the professional interestthat social workers have in helping their clients achieve moreharmonious lives, the space for mediation would appear considerableand yet the connections between mediation and social work are,as yet, insufficiently mapped and analysed, in terms of boththeory and practice. This paper draws on literature and recentresearch to review the relationship between family court mediationand social work.     

深圳医事仲裁中的调解与人民调解的比较

仲裁程序中的调解是我国《仲裁法》所确立的一项基本制度,也是我国仲裁机构的一贯做法。在深圳医患纠纷仲裁院已受理的医事纠纷案件中,大约2/3通过调解结案,所有调解结果均顺利履行。仲裁庭选择调解结案有助于化解医患矛盾,且当事人对调解协议中确定的义务自动履行的可能性明显加大、需要借助法院强制执行的可能性缩小。通过对医事仲裁中的调解与不收任何费用的人民调解进行相同与差异性的比较得出院在新近推出的两种医患纠纷处理方式中,仲裁优于人民调解。