Boundaries and Family Practices: Implications for Assessing Child Abuse

SUMMARY

Family practices related to hygiene, affection behavior, and privacy were studied using a sample of mental health and child welfare professionals. The professionals were asked to use their own experience to state up to what age it was acceptable for parents and children of the same gender and mixed gender to engage in certain family practices. For virtually all family practices, respondents reported lower appropriate ages for mixed gender pairs. Family practices were acceptable for mothers with their daughters up to older ages than fathers with their sons. Results indicate high variability in the responses regarding appropriate ages, as well as whether the behavior was ever acceptable. The implications of these substantial differences among professionals who often assess these practices as “soft signs” related to abuse are discussed.     

POST-PANOPTIC SURVEILLANCE THROUGH HEALTHCARE RATING SITES

This article examines websites where patients rate and evaluate healthcare services as mechanisms for transforming citizens into surveillers of public services in order to generate knowledge about the everyday performance of professionals and institutions. Using post-panoptic theories about the use of information and communication technologies in daily life, it questions how such sites, and the knowledge they generate, relate to existing surveillance structures. It begins with a review of current surveillance literature before turning to the empirical case of the Dutch website Zoekdokter. It situates the site in its specific national health and policy context, which enables not only an analysis of the site, but also the existing rules, norms and structures for monitoring performance and the dynamic between multiple types of surveillance that occur simultaneously in practice. Zoekdokter.nl is one of six cases in this research project and is the only case where patients are encouraged to evaluate individual professionals identified by name and location. I analyze website texts and 15 stakeholder interviews using the post-panoptic concepts of sousveillance, coveillance and infoveillance. In the discussion, I use the case to reflect on several assumptions made in current post-panoptic theory and, more specifically, on the transferability of these ideas to specific sectors, such as healthcare.     

Youth in Foster Care and Social Media: A Framework for Developing Privacy Guidelines

Although youth in foster care most likely use social media websites, there appears to be a lack of policy guidelines related to this use. When one considers youth in foster care, the state's mandate to provide safety, and foster parents' rights to exercise parenting responsibilities, the notion of privacy and the use of social media becomes complex. Critical Systems Heuristics will be introduced as a tool in developing policy recommendations. An application of this framework will be provided which can serve as a guide for an agency or workgroup tasked with developing policy guidelines for social media use by youth in foster care.     

官员财产申报的地方试验

官员财产申报制度被誉为是腐败的\     

解读美国电子监控制度的演变

美国联邦最高法院通过判例确认政府从事电子监控应受联邦宪法\     

论个人信用信息公开的私法规制

个人信用信息公开与隐私权之间的矛盾,需要通过利益衡量予以解决。个人信用信息的不当公开,将对隐私权造成侵害。个人信用信息公开的内在动因是克服交易主体之间的信息不对称,是信息使用者和提供者之间不同需求的利益博弈。个人信用信息公开与隐私权保护之间的冲突,需要进行利益衡量并通过技术手段予以协调。个人信用信息公开可以抽象为评级符号,并通过经济因素、声誉风险以及社会监督等多种路径予以规制。个人信用信息公开首先要不超越事先设定目的,其次要强调目的与结果的协调,最后需要信息主体的特定授权,进而有效解决二者之间的矛盾。     

用户隐私风险感知对平台社交账号登录方式选择的影响研究

互联网平台向用户开放社交账号登录,在方便用户登录的同时,可通过共享用户信息提升广告定向能力。本文通过构建博弈模型,在考虑用户隐私风险感知时,研究社交账号登录对平台、广告主和用户三方的影响以及平台开放社交账号登录的决策选择。研究结果表明,因用户隐私风险感知的存在,平台不一定会开放社交账号登录。当隐私敏感用户占比较高时,若社交账号登录为平台带来定向能力提升值较高,开放社交账号登录反而会降低平台收益。此外,研究还发现,若平台开放社交账号登录,不同隐私风险感知的用户占比及平台定向能力提升值都将影响平台的广告定向能力及社交账号登录的引流效果。     

批评性报道中的细节问题与侵权纠纷

批评性报道的细节处理不当可能引发侵权诉讼.我国法律对"细节失实"是否构成侵权并无明确的规定.司法案例表明,细节不真实或分寸不符只要构成对当事人社会评价的明显降低,失实的细节构成侵权;出于完整报道事件情节的需要,对某些不宜披露的细节性信息进行公开可能构成对当事人隐私权的侵害;作为细节要素的意见表达言辞过于凸显贬斥的主观倾向,易于产生损害被批评者人格尊严的侵权后果.     

数字孪生的哲学审视

元宇宙技术的快速发展,不仅意味着虚拟世界与真实世界之间的界限愈加模糊,无物不虚拟、无物不现实,以虚实融合的方式向人类展现出构建与现实物理世界相互映射的全息数字世界的可能性,也势必会给现实物理空间的法律制度设计带来一定的冲击。具体而言,元宇宙在法律层面带来的挑战主要集中于数字身份、数据隐私、知识产权保护、反垄断、反不正当竞争等方面,因此,相应的法律优化方案可以以数字身份法律、数据法、知识产权法、反垄断法和反不正当竞争法为重点来展开。

     

个人信息保护法的时代意义

大数据时代,犯罪控制与信息隐私保护之间的相对平衡被打破,大数据侦查在发展过程中出现了外源性信息隐私权危机和内生性信息隐私权危机。外源性信息隐私权危机是大数据侦查外部法律制度的结构性缺陷带来的信息隐私权保护困境,包括大数据侦查法律定位模糊和侦查控权的“内卷化”;内生性信息隐私权危机是内嵌于大数据侦查自身行动逻辑和运行规律中无法自我消解的隐私难题,包括个人信息数据处理的“开放性”和侦查要素外延的“扩张性”。要实现大数据侦查视域下的信息隐私权保护,就应当明确大数据侦查的法律定位及建立递进式审查标准,实现规制程序的诉讼化改造,确立私主体参与侦查的分级授权和过程性监督,建立实质性信息隐私权保护衡量标准。