移民的陌生人意象:三个社会学传统

三个重要的社会学家齐美尔、舒茨和鲍曼先后以"陌生人"为核心概念建构讨论了这一群体,阐释"陌生人"的产生机制、表现形态、当地社会的反应及由此带来的困扰,这无疑为移民研究提供了新的理论视角。而这样的理论传统是以往的移民研究所忽视的,这在一定程度上导致移民研究缺乏更为一般意义上的理论思考,缺乏对流动性这一重大社会理论议题的回应,正是在这个意义上,重新审视这样的传统是有意义的。本文的目的是对三位社会学家关于"陌生人"的论断进行评述并检视这样的论述与中国移民研究的相关性。     

The Subpoena of Ethnographic Data

This essay outlines the author's experience of having his ethnographic data subpoenaed. It outlines the challenges of subpoena's to research, and suggests four solutions: (1) Apply for and utilize the National Institutes of Health certificate of confidentiality by asking health‐related questions over the course of one's research; (2) Establish a task force that articulates clear ethical guidelines for ethnographic research, with attention to the conditions wherein ethnographers can break confidentiality (and might also comply with subpoenas). These ethical guidelines should then be made clear to research subjects as a part of informed consent processes; (3) Demand that institutions (institutional review boards) that require confidentiality as a condition of research be required to defend that confidentiality through the office of the general counsel; (4) Socialize the cost of subpoenas, wherein scholars can be part of an insurance pool that will defend them in the event of a subpoena and thereby defend the general enterprise of ethnographic research.     

Contingent Eclecticism

For more than a century, methodological diversity within the social sciences has been the source of recurrent paradigm wars, and no obvious winner seems to be in sight. The aim of this article is to explore the contingencies underlying this diversity. It is argued that the shared condition of complexity forces us to adopt a pragmatic perspective from which even relevant ontological and epistemological assumptions should be thought of as contextual rather than absolute. In particular, the extent to which social causality is perceived as stable and universal vs. dynamic and contextual and the extent to which research‐related reflexivity is an issue appear to set apart the different approaches. Towards the end of the article examples of methodological fit and misfit are provided to illustrate the relevancy of the “contingent eclecticism” observed in practice.     

解释冲突的公断(Ⅰ)——论利科对当代诠释学的贡献

在当代诠释学领域中,各种诠释学理论相互冲突,方法论与存在论之间的冲突就是其中之一。利科立足西方哲学传统,通过现象学、语义学与反思环节,对诠释学方法论与存在论之间的关系做出了公断,解答了解释的冲突。     

The embodied becoming of autism and childhood: a storytelling methodology

In this article I explore a methodology of storytelling as a means of bringing together research around autism and childhood in a new way, as a site of the embodied becoming of autism and childhood. Through reflection on an ethnographic story of embodiment, the body is explored as a site of knowledge production that contests its dominantly storied subjectivation as a ‘disordered’ child. Storytelling is used to experiment with a line of flight from the autistic-child-research assemblage into new spaces of potential and possibility where the becomings of bodies within the collision of autism and childhood can be celebrated.     

论我国国外马克思主义研究的三个核心问题——兼论我国国外马克思主义研究的自我身份认同

研究边界的日益模糊、研究对象选择的随意性和研究方法的非历史性,是制约我国国外马克思主义研究进一步走向深入的三大核心问题。应当对国外马克思主义研究的边界和理论性质作大致明确的规定,并且立足于推进中国马克思主义理论建设和现代化实践这一目的出发,破除形而上学的两极思维方式,展开对国外马克思主义理论的研究,实现国外马克思主义研究在当代中国的价值。     

社会学视野中的教育及民族教育

社会学对于教育和民族教育问题的研究更为看重对教育得以运行的社会宏观背景的关注。从社会学的学科视野出发,作为培养人的一种社会活动和一种社会设置,教育无时无刻表征着社会生活的现实,所以,教育就应该凸显它本来就具有的社会底蕴;而社会学视野中的民族教育,自有其更为宽广的社会背景、更为深厚的学术支撑和更为丰富的学理内涵,本文就此展开了论述。     

邓小平解决民族问题的方法论研究

本文从邓小平解决民族问题的理论入手 ,研究了邓小平解决民族问题的方法论 ,研究表明 ,只有解放思想、实事求是 ,才能够很好地解决民族问题     

中国特色社会主义理论体系方法论中的传统智慧

中国传统思维方式中的思想精华和合理内核,是中国特色社会主义理论体系方法论的一个重要来源,并在中国特色社会主义理论体系中得到传承和发展,主要表现在从“经世致用”到理论与实际相结合、从“一多统一”到主导性与多样性相结合、从“循序渐进”到顶层设计与摸着石头过河相结合、从“重视整体”到整体思维与协调发展相结合、从“贵和尚中”到和谐相处与求同存异相结合、从“知行合一”到认识与实践相统一等方面。研究中国特色社会主义理论体系方法论中的传统智慧,有利于进一步增强民族文化自信,坚持和发展中国特色社会主义,促进马克思主义中国化。     

新传媒,新世界: 网络时代的哲学反思

新传媒正在从时空观念、经济组织形式和社会结构等方面全方位地形成一个新世界,这个新世界是一个以互联网为社会深层结构的开放世界,它的地平线已经显现。作为新世界的网络世界,有其自身的逻辑,但离不开人类的积极参与。新世界在方法论上,更倾向于归纳逻辑、认知逻辑和论辩理论。新世界的出现使人们对资本主义何时灭亡、人的主体地位等问题产生更多的开放性思考。