高等学校对学生违纪处分之正当程序探索

我国高等学校对学生违纪处分中存在诸多问题,比如没有专门的学生违纪处分主体、不告知学生应当享有的权利等,导致近几年来出现许多学生告学校的案例.采用分析的方法提出,为了减少纠纷的发生,应当完善高校学生管理规定中对学生违纪处分的程序,比如建立事先通知程序、在审理程序中举行听证、规范送达和告知程序等.     

Gendered constructions of Filipina teachers in Japan's Skype English conversation industry

Drawing on data from a larger project that includes blog entries and interview findings, this paper investigates the ways in which Filipina teachers working in Japan's Skype English conversation (eikaiwa) industry are constructed as intimate and romanticized entities through Japanese male learners’ discursive practices. The paper argues that these highly gendered constructions are never unrelated to the male learners’ desires to display their masculinity. The paper also points out that these desires stem from the long‐established sex‐mediated link between Japanese men and Filipinas based on their economic disparities. The paper concludes with a suggestion that the popularity of Philippines‐based Skype eikaiwa cannot be explained by the development of telecommunication tools or neoliberalism alone; rather, it should be understood as a trend that has emerged from the complicated intersection of all pre‐existent and current economic, socio‐political, cultural‐political, and technological components.     

iConstruct: virtual disabilities in online settings

The present study focused on cultural constructions of disability in virtual settings, examining specifically how cultural constructions of disability were mediated through the use of online technology. This was accomplished by identifying and analyzing Greek Cypriot online news media articles and online readers’ posts in response to these articles. Findings indicated that disability in these online settings mainly reproduced traditional models of disability, with the charity model being more prevalent. However, there were instances in which dominant discourses of disability were ruptured through the introduction of counter-narratives in users’ posts which echoed the human rights model of disability. Implications for the fields of media, education and disability studies are discussed in relation to the possibility of using digital media to contribute to the challenge of critical media literacy to address issues of diversity and disability.     

Narratives from the neighbourhood: The discursive construction of integration problems in talkback radio1

This paper examines how speakers deploy narrative devices in talking about Sudanese refugees. Particularly, we show how narrative constructions form an important basis for the advancement of accounts about integration problems into the local polity. We analyse talkback ‘phone‐in’ calls to a local Adelaide radio station that provide callers an opportunity to give accounts of events and social phenomena that concern them in their local settings. Analysis shows that speakers regularly deployed narrative constructions, first‐hand ‘witnessing’ devices that functioned to legitimate accounts as veridical versions of events, and contrast devices to explicate the moral and behavioural aberrance of Sudanese refugees. The analysis illustrates how these discursive devices function rhetorically in interaction, in ways that differentiate Sudanese refugees as problematic. Through this analysis, we contend that narrative devices precipitate and bolster socio‐political policies that have serious, negative consequences for Sudanese refugees.     

Professionals' attitudes to children's participation in decision-making: dichotomous accounts and doctrinal contests

The attitude of professionals to the involvement of children in decision-making is unclear. This paper discusses a recent research study that utilized qualitative and quantitative methods to explore the views of professionals working in family support and child protection about two different aspects of children's participation in decision-making: the age at which children should make decisions and whether or not they should be involved in child protection conferences. The results showed that social workers tended to favour one of two diametrically opposed viewpoints about the age at which young people should make decisions and then in discussions with colleagues they sought to persuade others to change their perspective. Social workers who believed that young people should not make decisions until much older nevertheless thought that they should be involved in conferences whereas non-social workers did not make this distinction: for them, children who were not old enough to make decisions for themselves should not be involved in conferences. The results are discussed in the light of some of the implications for practice. The paper concludes by outlining how the results informed the design of a training pack commissioned by the Department of Health concerning the involvement of young people.     

群体腐败是社会转型期亟待重视的反腐区域

群体腐败是商品经济发展的历史产物，无论是在中国还是在世界其他国家，已越来越为人们所关注，因此，群体腐败的预防和斗争，已经成为我们反腐败斗争的重点之一。     

紧急避险:对无责任能力人的侵害予以反击之行为的重新界定——从主观违法性论在我国之提倡说起

对无责任能力人之侵害予以反击的行为应当属于紧急避险,因为:在我国的犯罪论体系之下,只有采取主观违法性论才能保持理论的严谨和一贯;紧急避险的对象并非仅限于第三人的合法权益;将反击无责任能力人之侵害的行为定性为紧急避险在理论上更为圆满;行为人在无法知道对方是无责任能力人时所实施的反击属于意外事件型的假想防卫;作为正当防卫对象所必须具备的责任能力并非刑事责任能力,而是民事侵权责任能力。     

Parental constructions of masculinity at the transition to parenthood: the division of parental leave among Austrian couples

Men and masculinity are considered a key factor in changing gender inequality at the transition to parenthood. Prior research on gendered division of parental leave concentrated on fathers’ perspectives. This paper includes perspectives of fathers and mothers who make use of parental leave in different ways and asks how masculinity is jointly constructed, how these constructions are linked to the use of parental leave, and if and how they are oriented towards hegemonic masculinity. The analysis is based on 44 qualitative interviews with 11 Austrian couples before and after birth when decisions concerning parental leave were made. Our case reconstructions reveal that parents considered parental leave a central element of masculinity as long as it suited fathers’ needs and circumstances permitted. The decisions for sharing parental leave were father-centred as both partners valued father’s leave higher than mother’s.     

新被字句中“被-”标记的类化与泛化

在日常交际特别是网络中,新被字句(如"被自杀"、"被代表"等)屡见不鲜,俨然成为一种很受欢迎的固定表达。在新被字句中,"被-"是一种标记,但未必是被动标记。新被字句从传统被字句中剥离出来,"被"的意义经历了语义浓缩,被"专化";其后又作为一种原型义参与到其他词汇的组合中,构成"被XX"词族,且被赋予新的语义,这是"类化"的过程;最后,随着使用范围的扩大,"被-"在保留基本语义的基础上,失去了某些语义特征,这就是"泛化"。在此过程中,"被-"标记逐渐完成语法化的过程。     

风尚犯除罪化研究

社会的巨大变迁使人们对部分风尚犯的存在价值提出质疑，对风尚犯价值评价的基础在于：首先要明确风尚犯的概念，通过解析其特征展示其内涵，进而对古今中外关于风尚犯的法律规制进行评说。文章提出了我国当前对刑法中部分风尚犯除罪化的理论和现实理由，试图为我国的理论界与司法界设立一个新视点。