和谐管理：中国式企业管理的基本概念、方向和路径

一、和谐的渊源及实现和谐管理的基本内涵 1、和谐的渊源。“和谐”思想是中华文明的识别基因和中国古典哲学的核心范畴,它也是华夏文明脉传千年、绵延不绝、影响广远的基轴。中华文华的三大支柱儒家、释家、道家分别从不同的角度对这个概念作了系统的阐发（详见表1）。     

古典式市场化的终结——浙江省制度变迁的现状与对策

通过对改革开放30年来浙江市场化进程的分析,提出走出古典市场化,走向现代市场化的见解。现代市场经济最重要的特征是均衡、法治,以及符合均衡法治要求下的持续活力。为此,要加快促进制度变迁．首先是经济、政治、文化和社会整体联动,形成均衡协调的改革进程;其次是诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁相结合。即自下而上与自上而下相结合,进一步形成民间与政府积极互动、地方政府与中央政府相互呼应的改革进程;第三是以制度建设为主,加快提升法治水平,形成以法治为基础的改革进程。     

鲍德温•斯宾塞与后维多利亚时代的古典人类学

The post-Victorian anthropologist Baldwin Spencer was the first to investigate the central and northern aboriginal tribes of Australia. His ethnographic works in this area have greatly in-fluenced related disciplines and studies in fields such as kinship, totem worship, and primitive reli-gions. In the field of classics and anthropology, Spencer’s academic heritage has received wide-spread respect and recognition, and has made sub-sequent academic discussion possible. In order to present Spencer’s personal experiences and aca-demic ideas clearly and comprehensively, it is nec-essary to return to the post-Victorian context, and comb Spencer’ s life history and academic history. Taking important clues from various times an e-vents in his life, the paper introduces three peri-ods:Spencer’s early training in the discipline and his epistemic background, his medium-term eth-nographic investigations and works, and the later investigations of Tierra del Fuego. Textual study, based on Spencer’s life history and academic histo-ry, is very useful to understand his ethnographic investigations. Sir Walter Baldwin Spencer ( 1860 -1929 ) was born on 23 June, 1860 in Lancashire, Eng-land. Spencer was educated at Old Trafford School and at the Manchester School of Art. His interest in art and sketching was lifelong, and would reveal itself in his competence as a scientific draftsman and illustrator ( D. J. Mulvaney,1990 ) . Entering Owens College ( Victoria University of Manchester) in 1879, Spencer intended to study medicine. In-spired by Milnes Marshall, a disciple of Darwin disciple, he became a committed evolutionary biol-ogist, soon abandoning conventional religion. He entered the University of Oxford in 1881 to study
science under Professor H. N. Moseley, who com-bined an enthusiasm for evolutionary biology with ethnological interests. Spencer grasped Oxford ’ s diverse opportunities, which included lectures by Ruskin and E. B. Tylor. In 1887, Spencer ar-rived at Melbourne University . With his colleague Professor David Masson, Spencer helped to trans-form university standards and they co-operated as entrepreneurs of Australian science. Spencer was recruited as zoologist and photog-rapher in the 1894 Horn scientific exploration ex-pedition to central Australia. His anthropological interest was rekindled when he met F. J. Gillen, the Alice Springs postmaster, during the expedi-tion. In 1896 Spencer joined Gillen for the most intensive fieldwork then attempted in Australia. The Native Tribes of Central Australia ( 1899 ) , which resulted, was to influence contemporary theories on social evolution and interpretations of the origins of art and ceremonial practices. Spencer and Gillen drove a buggy from Oodnadatta to Borroloola in 1901-02 . Their research resulted in The Northern Tribes of Central Australia ( 1904 );Haddon had written that the names of Spencer and Gillen are familiar to every ethnologist in the world, and probably no books on ethnology have been so wide-ly noticed and criticized as have The Native Tribes of Central Australia and The Northern Tribes of Central Australia (A. C. Haddon ,1902). To assist the Government of the Common-wealth, Spencer was appointed Special Commis-sioner for Aboriginals in the Northern Territory, and also their Chief Protector. He also led three other scientists, including J. A. Gilruth, on the 1911 Preliminary Scientific Expedition. Native Tribes of the Northern Territory of Australia (1914)
described his ethnographic observations and the ex-tensive collections made on the expedition. At the government ’ s request, Spencer visited Alice Springs and Hermannsburg in 1923 . He published The Arunta: A Study of a Stone Age People ( 2 vols, 1927 ) to respond to the criticisms derived from Carl Stretlow and defend his work. A popular rewrite of previous books followed—Wanderings in Wild Australia ( 2 vols, 1928 )—this time under his sole authorship. Spencer retired as emeritus professor in 1919 . His nerves and his judgments were impaired from the strain of continuous overwork, the virtual disin-tegration of his marriage, and he was finally hospi-talized in 1921 . His health improved and within two years he resumed anthropological activities and rebuilt his art collection. He sailed to Tierra del Fuego together with Jean Hamilton to undertake anthropological studies early in 1929. Spencer, with an unrivalled record of anthropological field-work in Australia, undertook this journey to fill a gap in our knowledge, and compare very different and remote races of mankind (A. C. H. ,1931). However, his gallant attempt was prematurely frus-trated by his death from angina pectoris, at which point he had been only two months in the field. His notes were organized and published as Spencer’s Last Journey (1931). His achievements were recognized. Elected as a fellow of the Royal Society in 1900 , he was ap-pointed C. M. G. in 1904 and K. C. M. G. in 1916 . Manchester University conferred him with an honorary doctorate of science, while Melbourne a-warded him a doctorate of letters. Exeter College, Oxford, elected him to an honorary fellowship in 1907 , and stained glass in its hall commemorates his contribution. James Frazer’s letter to Spencer in 1899 was prophetic: books like mine, merely speculative, will be superseded sooner or later ( the sooner the better for the sake of truth) by bet-ter induction based on fuller knowledge;books like yours, containing records of observations, will nev-er be superseded ( John M. Cooper, 1932 ) . Therefore, the sense and value of reading and un-derstanding Spencer and his books today goes with-out saying.     

中国科学技术哲学三十年

科学技术哲学学科原称自然辩证法.自然辩证法传统和科学哲学传统的对峙和融合贯穿了过去三十年的发展.自然辩证法传统属于德国古典自然哲学传统,有意识形态的优势,关注社会现实问题;科学哲学传统属于逻辑经验主义传统,强调学科自主性,重视学科建设.两个传统和平共存,但带来了这个学科的致命问题:名实长期冲突,学科定位不明.     

人品·学术·文章——评崔凡芝教授《一得集》

崔凡芝教授1966年毕业于北京大学中文系古典文献专业,先后任教于黑龙江齐齐哈尔师范（今齐齐哈尔大学）中文系和山西大学历史系。古稀之年,她的史学研究成果集结出版了,先生称之为“史学散论”,并命名为《一得集》,谓自己非智者,该集是其“千虑”之得。《一得集》是先生数十年从事历史学教学、研究的成果凝结。先生勤勉严谨的治学态度、求真务实的科学精神、高屋建瓴的学术硕果,     

中国文艺思想的"梦思维"——古典文论阅读札记

梦,作为人类的一种特殊类精神现象,一直受到人们的重视,特别是弗洛伊德梦的解析理论出现后,"梦意识"在现代思想领域引起了巨大反响,推动了西方现代文艺美学的发生和发展.正是在这种背景下,唤醒了我们对于中国古代"梦思维"的兴趣和关注.所谓中国的"梦思维",既是对中国传统文献、特别是文论中一系列有关梦的认识与理论观念的辨析,也是打通中国文论与西方文论在有关梦意识方面隔膜的一种努力,试图在不同文化理论之间搭起一座桥梁.     

《资本论》与西方经济学理论体系比较

<资本论>与西方经济学的分析方法、研究对象、研究目的和理论结构有原则区别,说明二者在整个理论体系上是对立的,不容混淆,也不能融合.但这不等于说西方经济学一无是处,事实上它的某些个别分析方法和观点对我们有启示和借鉴意义.如新古典经济学对建立和完善我国社会主义市场机制和加强微观经济管理有重要参考价值;新古典综合理论的某些方法对于我们认识处理微观、宏观经济的作用和相互关系有借鉴意义;西方经济学的种种宏观经济政策目标和措施对加强和改善我国宏观经济管理,完善马克思主义政治经济学理论体系也有借鉴意义.     

一则藏族民间故事的文化探源与思考

文章从一则关于朗达玛的西藏民间故事出发,结合世界范围内其同源传说的传播与流变过程,对它的起源及其与古希腊文化的关系进行了初步考证,指出古典文化中的智慧往往具有超时空、超民族的特性,在弘扬民族文化时应加以重视.     

论古典诗歌叙述口吻的模糊性

我国古典诗歌的叙述口吻具有模糊性的特征。它所运用的口吻互渗、口吻互叠、口吻的转移与替代等手法使诗歌表述具有不确定性和多向性,这是促成中国诗歌独特美学品格和艺术个性的原因之一。这些艺术手法和审美方式对古典戏曲、音乐等其他艺术形式的影响也是深刻的。     

新兴古典经济学:古典经济学的现代复兴

本文考察了现代经济学的发展过程.文章在简单地回顾了古典经济学的发展及其特点后,详尽地分析了作为现代主流经济学的新古典经济学的理论假设和方法论特点,比较分析了新古典分析框架的局限性,对近年来出现的新兴古典经济学的基本内容作了简单介绍.