试论人力资本理论的形成及其发展

人力资本是通过对人进行投资而形成的资本.西方人力资本理论的产生及演变,先后经历古典政治经济学的人力资本思想、新古典经济学的人力资本思想、现代人力资本和当代人力资本理论的发展阶段.人力资本理论的不断完善,使人在物质生产中的决定性作用得到复归.本文对人力资本理论的形成及其发展进行分析和评述,以期对我国人力资本理论的研究和人才队伍的建设提供一些有益的探索与借鉴.     

中国古典词学中的词意创造论

我国古典词学中的词意创造论,主要体现在两个维面：一是对词意审美特征与要求的探讨,二是对词意表现与创作因素关系的考察。上述两大维面,从主体上展开了词意创造之论,多向度地将词意创造的论说取向与空间呈现了出来。     

从文字的深处进入传统——何其芳《休洗红》的古典意象与意绪

何其芳《休洗红》一诗几乎全由古诗词意象暗缀融合而成,这些意象形成诗歌的基本骨架,营造出新诗中最具古典美的意境与画面.同时,它们又被诗人重新激活,以古典内涵为原始依托,在诗人的语言场中生长出新的义项,表达着诗人的现代情感与体验.     

论诗画关系的发生与确立

诗歌与绘画超越艺术界限走向融合的过程是一部悠久的历史．庞大而绵延。诗画关系从汉朝的发生发展到宋代已经完全确立,其交融由自发到自觉．由局部而整体,由实践到理论,由表层至深层。是一个全面融合、递进层深的历程。     

和谐管理：中国式企业管理的基本概念、方向和路径

一、和谐的渊源及实现和谐管理的基本内涵 1、和谐的渊源。“和谐”思想是中华文明的识别基因和中国古典哲学的核心范畴,它也是华夏文明脉传千年、绵延不绝、影响广远的基轴。中华文华的三大支柱儒家、释家、道家分别从不同的角度对这个概念作了系统的阐发（详见表1）。     

浅析新石器时代中外陶器造型艺术的发展

人类的历史发展进程犹如一条大河,而我们原始艺术就犹如这条大河的源头,虽然处于河流的发源,水流潺潺,缓缓流淌,但是我们决不能忽略它的存在,而更应该对它加以保护和探索,如果没有源头,我们这条历史长河也绝不可能如此的波澜壮阔.即使在今日,当我们想对我们的历史进行探究的时候,也依然需要追溯到这源头,一探我们古老文明的神秘与奥秘,因为它是我们的根.新石器时代人们已经初步踏入农耕文明,相对安稳的生活使人们对物质生活的水平有了进一步的提升,陶器在新石器时代的发展为我们的艺术和我们的历史添上了浓墨重彩的一笔.     

古典式市场化的终结——浙江省制度变迁的现状与对策

通过对改革开放30年来浙江市场化进程的分析,提出走出古典市场化,走向现代市场化的见解。现代市场经济最重要的特征是均衡、法治,以及符合均衡法治要求下的持续活力。为此,要加快促进制度变迁．首先是经济、政治、文化和社会整体联动,形成均衡协调的改革进程;其次是诱致性制度变迁与强制性制度变迁相结合。即自下而上与自上而下相结合,进一步形成民间与政府积极互动、地方政府与中央政府相互呼应的改革进程;第三是以制度建设为主,加快提升法治水平,形成以法治为基础的改革进程。     

鲍德温•斯宾塞与后维多利亚时代的古典人类学

The post-Victorian anthropologist Baldwin Spencer was the first to investigate the central and northern aboriginal tribes of Australia. His ethnographic works in this area have greatly in-fluenced related disciplines and studies in fields such as kinship, totem worship, and primitive reli-gions. In the field of classics and anthropology, Spencer’s academic heritage has received wide-spread respect and recognition, and has made sub-sequent academic discussion possible. In order to present Spencer’s personal experiences and aca-demic ideas clearly and comprehensively, it is nec-essary to return to the post-Victorian context, and comb Spencer’ s life history and academic history. Taking important clues from various times an e-vents in his life, the paper introduces three peri-ods:Spencer’s early training in the discipline and his epistemic background, his medium-term eth-nographic investigations and works, and the later investigations of Tierra del Fuego. Textual study, based on Spencer’s life history and academic histo-ry, is very useful to understand his ethnographic investigations. Sir Walter Baldwin Spencer ( 1860 -1929 ) was born on 23 June, 1860 in Lancashire, Eng-land. Spencer was educated at Old Trafford School and at the Manchester School of Art. His interest in art and sketching was lifelong, and would reveal itself in his competence as a scientific draftsman and illustrator ( D. J. Mulvaney,1990 ) . Entering Owens College ( Victoria University of Manchester) in 1879, Spencer intended to study medicine. In-spired by Milnes Marshall, a disciple of Darwin disciple, he became a committed evolutionary biol-ogist, soon abandoning conventional religion. He entered the University of Oxford in 1881 to study
science under Professor H. N. Moseley, who com-bined an enthusiasm for evolutionary biology with ethnological interests. Spencer grasped Oxford ’ s diverse opportunities, which included lectures by Ruskin and E. B. Tylor. In 1887, Spencer ar-rived at Melbourne University . With his colleague Professor David Masson, Spencer helped to trans-form university standards and they co-operated as entrepreneurs of Australian science. Spencer was recruited as zoologist and photog-rapher in the 1894 Horn scientific exploration ex-pedition to central Australia. His anthropological interest was rekindled when he met F. J. Gillen, the Alice Springs postmaster, during the expedi-tion. In 1896 Spencer joined Gillen for the most intensive fieldwork then attempted in Australia. The Native Tribes of Central Australia ( 1899 ) , which resulted, was to influence contemporary theories on social evolution and interpretations of the origins of art and ceremonial practices. Spencer and Gillen drove a buggy from Oodnadatta to Borroloola in 1901-02 . Their research resulted in The Northern Tribes of Central Australia ( 1904 );Haddon had written that the names of Spencer and Gillen are familiar to every ethnologist in the world, and probably no books on ethnology have been so wide-ly noticed and criticized as have The Native Tribes of Central Australia and The Northern Tribes of Central Australia (A. C. Haddon ,1902). To assist the Government of the Common-wealth, Spencer was appointed Special Commis-sioner for Aboriginals in the Northern Territory, and also their Chief Protector. He also led three other scientists, including J. A. Gilruth, on the 1911 Preliminary Scientific Expedition. Native Tribes of the Northern Territory of Australia (1914)
described his ethnographic observations and the ex-tensive collections made on the expedition. At the government ’ s request, Spencer visited Alice Springs and Hermannsburg in 1923 . He published The Arunta: A Study of a Stone Age People ( 2 vols, 1927 ) to respond to the criticisms derived from Carl Stretlow and defend his work. A popular rewrite of previous books followed—Wanderings in Wild Australia ( 2 vols, 1928 )—this time under his sole authorship. Spencer retired as emeritus professor in 1919 . His nerves and his judgments were impaired from the strain of continuous overwork, the virtual disin-tegration of his marriage, and he was finally hospi-talized in 1921 . His health improved and within two years he resumed anthropological activities and rebuilt his art collection. He sailed to Tierra del Fuego together with Jean Hamilton to undertake anthropological studies early in 1929. Spencer, with an unrivalled record of anthropological field-work in Australia, undertook this journey to fill a gap in our knowledge, and compare very different and remote races of mankind (A. C. H. ,1931). However, his gallant attempt was prematurely frus-trated by his death from angina pectoris, at which point he had been only two months in the field. His notes were organized and published as Spencer’s Last Journey (1931). His achievements were recognized. Elected as a fellow of the Royal Society in 1900 , he was ap-pointed C. M. G. in 1904 and K. C. M. G. in 1916 . Manchester University conferred him with an honorary doctorate of science, while Melbourne a-warded him a doctorate of letters. Exeter College, Oxford, elected him to an honorary fellowship in 1907 , and stained glass in its hall commemorates his contribution. James Frazer’s letter to Spencer in 1899 was prophetic: books like mine, merely speculative, will be superseded sooner or later ( the sooner the better for the sake of truth) by bet-ter induction based on fuller knowledge;books like yours, containing records of observations, will nev-er be superseded ( John M. Cooper, 1932 ) . Therefore, the sense and value of reading and un-derstanding Spencer and his books today goes with-out saying.     

唯美的偏至——拉斐尔前派综述

拉斐尔前派运动是一场从绘画领域扩展和延伸到文学领域的文化思潮运动,是英国唯美主义的奠基石.文章论述了拉斐尔前派的形成、发展,并对其主要成员进行了界定.     

中国科学技术哲学三十年

科学技术哲学学科原称自然辩证法.自然辩证法传统和科学哲学传统的对峙和融合贯穿了过去三十年的发展.自然辩证法传统属于德国古典自然哲学传统,有意识形态的优势,关注社会现实问题;科学哲学传统属于逻辑经验主义传统,强调学科自主性,重视学科建设.两个传统和平共存,但带来了这个学科的致命问题:名实长期冲突,学科定位不明.