农村集体土地征收物权制度之缺陷与完善

土地征收是各国普遍存在的一项重要的法律制度。目前土地征收在征地范围、征收程序、补偿标准和利益分配等方面都存在着不合理,正视土地征收物权制度中存在的问题,解决国家土地所有权和农民土地所有权的冲突,提出相应的解决对策,建立切实可行、公平合理土地征收物权制度。     

资本逻辑批判与生命逻辑建构——乔尔·科威尔生态社会主义理论的生命政治意蕴

人的生命权利伴随着现代性的发展逐渐被凸显,而作为现代性发展的时代产物,生命政治学表现出对人作为现代主体的自然生命权利的价值审思。在此意义上,科威尔立足于生态中心主义的价值观将人置于整个生态系统的集合中,其生态社会主义理论无论对生态危机的揭示,还是对作为危机根源的资本逻辑的批判,都表现出对人的生命权利的政治关怀,具有丰富的生命政治意蕴。科威尔不仅从理论维度揭露了资本与危机对人的生命世界的渗入以及“资本力场”对人的生命权利的异化,而且从实践维度提出了资本主义视域下人的生命政治回归的基本构想,即通向生态社会主义社会以实现对人的生命权利的本质占有。因此,科威尔生态社会主义理论以资本逻辑批判与生命逻辑建构为主题,蕴含着以批判“资本力场”对人的生命权利异化为核心,以克服生命权利异化从而实现人的生命解放为应然旨归的生命政治逻辑。     

从《皇明经世文编》的编纂论陈子龙的编辑思想

陈子龙主编的《皇明经世文编》,是一部“治乱攸关”的政书和“治国制度型的经世文编” ,以编书资治来挽救明末社会危机 ,反映了陈子龙经世致用的编辑思想 ,在编辑方法上采用主编负责和集体选辑 ,编者角色具有政治化和学者化合一的特点     

试论物权保护--一种经济分析的思路

文章运用法律经济的原理,结合我国物权法的实践,并借鉴国外相关的法理,以物权保护及其方法为研究对象,分别就物权的公力保护与私力保护、财产与责任保护规则的适用条件、利弊得失,以及物权保护的平等原则和效率原则进行了比较分析;在此基础上提出了低成本、高效益的物权保护制度创新的基干思路和途径。     

鲍德温•斯宾塞与后维多利亚时代的古典人类学

The post-Victorian anthropologist Baldwin Spencer was the first to investigate the central and northern aboriginal tribes of Australia. His ethnographic works in this area have greatly in-fluenced related disciplines and studies in fields such as kinship, totem worship, and primitive reli-gions. In the field of classics and anthropology, Spencer’s academic heritage has received wide-spread respect and recognition, and has made sub-sequent academic discussion possible. In order to present Spencer’s personal experiences and aca-demic ideas clearly and comprehensively, it is nec-essary to return to the post-Victorian context, and comb Spencer’ s life history and academic history. Taking important clues from various times an e-vents in his life, the paper introduces three peri-ods:Spencer’s early training in the discipline and his epistemic background, his medium-term eth-nographic investigations and works, and the later investigations of Tierra del Fuego. Textual study, based on Spencer’s life history and academic histo-ry, is very useful to understand his ethnographic investigations. Sir Walter Baldwin Spencer ( 1860 -1929 ) was born on 23 June, 1860 in Lancashire, Eng-land. Spencer was educated at Old Trafford School and at the Manchester School of Art. His interest in art and sketching was lifelong, and would reveal itself in his competence as a scientific draftsman and illustrator ( D. J. Mulvaney,1990 ) . Entering Owens College ( Victoria University of Manchester) in 1879, Spencer intended to study medicine. In-spired by Milnes Marshall, a disciple of Darwin disciple, he became a committed evolutionary biol-ogist, soon abandoning conventional religion. He entered the University of Oxford in 1881 to study
science under Professor H. N. Moseley, who com-bined an enthusiasm for evolutionary biology with ethnological interests. Spencer grasped Oxford ’ s diverse opportunities, which included lectures by Ruskin and E. B. Tylor. In 1887, Spencer ar-rived at Melbourne University . With his colleague Professor David Masson, Spencer helped to trans-form university standards and they co-operated as entrepreneurs of Australian science. Spencer was recruited as zoologist and photog-rapher in the 1894 Horn scientific exploration ex-pedition to central Australia. His anthropological interest was rekindled when he met F. J. Gillen, the Alice Springs postmaster, during the expedi-tion. In 1896 Spencer joined Gillen for the most intensive fieldwork then attempted in Australia. The Native Tribes of Central Australia ( 1899 ) , which resulted, was to influence contemporary theories on social evolution and interpretations of the origins of art and ceremonial practices. Spencer and Gillen drove a buggy from Oodnadatta to Borroloola in 1901-02 . Their research resulted in The Northern Tribes of Central Australia ( 1904 );Haddon had written that the names of Spencer and Gillen are familiar to every ethnologist in the world, and probably no books on ethnology have been so wide-ly noticed and criticized as have The Native Tribes of Central Australia and The Northern Tribes of Central Australia (A. C. Haddon ,1902). To assist the Government of the Common-wealth, Spencer was appointed Special Commis-sioner for Aboriginals in the Northern Territory, and also their Chief Protector. He also led three other scientists, including J. A. Gilruth, on the 1911 Preliminary Scientific Expedition. Native Tribes of the Northern Territory of Australia (1914)
described his ethnographic observations and the ex-tensive collections made on the expedition. At the government ’ s request, Spencer visited Alice Springs and Hermannsburg in 1923 . He published The Arunta: A Study of a Stone Age People ( 2 vols, 1927 ) to respond to the criticisms derived from Carl Stretlow and defend his work. A popular rewrite of previous books followed—Wanderings in Wild Australia ( 2 vols, 1928 )—this time under his sole authorship. Spencer retired as emeritus professor in 1919 . His nerves and his judgments were impaired from the strain of continuous overwork, the virtual disin-tegration of his marriage, and he was finally hospi-talized in 1921 . His health improved and within two years he resumed anthropological activities and rebuilt his art collection. He sailed to Tierra del Fuego together with Jean Hamilton to undertake anthropological studies early in 1929. Spencer, with an unrivalled record of anthropological field-work in Australia, undertook this journey to fill a gap in our knowledge, and compare very different and remote races of mankind (A. C. H. ,1931). However, his gallant attempt was prematurely frus-trated by his death from angina pectoris, at which point he had been only two months in the field. His notes were organized and published as Spencer’s Last Journey (1931). His achievements were recognized. Elected as a fellow of the Royal Society in 1900 , he was ap-pointed C. M. G. in 1904 and K. C. M. G. in 1916 . Manchester University conferred him with an honorary doctorate of science, while Melbourne a-warded him a doctorate of letters. Exeter College, Oxford, elected him to an honorary fellowship in 1907 , and stained glass in its hall commemorates his contribution. James Frazer’s letter to Spencer in 1899 was prophetic: books like mine, merely speculative, will be superseded sooner or later ( the sooner the better for the sake of truth) by bet-ter induction based on fuller knowledge;books like yours, containing records of observations, will nev-er be superseded ( John M. Cooper, 1932 ) . Therefore, the sense and value of reading and un-derstanding Spencer and his books today goes with-out saying.     

关于编纂民法典的若干思考

编纂我国民法典应坚持适当借鉴外国的经验,注重继承和创新,重视发挥学者作用的原则,编纂模式应采用汇编与制定相结合的方式;在民法典的体系结构上应坚持人格权独立成篇,合同与侵权行为从债法中分离出来分别立法的观点,同时,应将知识产权法作为民法的重要部分纳入民法典;民法典的具体内容应体现全面丰富,可操作性强兼具一定灵活性的特点,应特别注意为新科技引起的社会关系提供可适用的民法规则.     

非指喻非指：《庄子·齐物论》中的证伪逻辑和认识论

庄子在《齐物论》中首先通过证伪逻辑的论证,指出了公孙龙《指物论》《白马论》中论证逻辑的缺陷,还反驳了名家的"坚白之辩"和"名实之辩"。在此基础上,庄子进一步对名家的世界图景的建构方式提出了质疑,指出:通过分析的、自上而下的方式建构概念化的世界不可避免地会陷入认识的悖论;最后,庄子论证了"知通为一"以达"天籁"的认识论理想。     

习近平法治思想中的“国家治理现代化”法治理念与民法典规范

“坚持在法治轨道上推进国家治理体系与治理能力现代化”法治理念是习近平法治思想的重要组成部分,深刻诠释了法治是国家治理现代化的重要依托。民法典作为习近平法治思想的鲜明体现,彰显了中国特色社会主义法治的本质特征,为坚持在法治轨道上推进国家治理现代化保驾护航。民法典规范大力弘扬社会主义核心价值观,展示中国特色,为国家治理现代化强化了价值引领。民法典规范通过民事权益类型化完成了对民事主体私权益的系统构建,为国家治理现代化完善了私权体系。民法典规范通过修改关于物权与合同的大量法律条文,鼓励市场交易,维护交易安全,为国家治理现代化构建了有效的交易秩序。民法典规范通过新增或者完善诸多民事法律制度,促进民事立法体系化与科学化,为国家治理现代化提供了制度支撑。      

美编与文编的深度合作探讨

美编与文编均属于责任编辑的范畴,但是两者在业务分工上却存在明显的差异性。在进行图书设计的过程中,加强美编与文编的合作,有助于他们发挥各自的专业水平、使双方素质形成互补,同时使创意达到最满意的设计效果。由此可见,在后期的设计工作中,加强美编与文编的深度合作具有重要性与迫切性。     

俄联邦民法典立法架构评析

立法架构是法典内容在结构上的安排。立法架构是一个技术性问题,处理好了,不仅有利于法典的顺利出台,更有利于法典的理解和执行。一部法典的立法架构反映了它的立法理念、立法理论基础、立法时的社会经济状况条件等等。是一部法典的骨干,也是精髓的体现。本文通过阐述俄联邦民法典的立法背景以及立法架构的评析,分析了俄联邦民法典对我国现代民事立法的启示。